Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (Thread title edited by MNHQ)

994 replies

Whackitupto200 · 08/07/2019 09:27

JY’s parent sounds like an absolute loon. It would explain a lot.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1147905523347365888.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
popehilarious · 12/07/2019 23:55

btw every time I see 'SG' I think 'Susie Green' Blush

popehilarious · 12/07/2019 23:54

Just going through the latest batch now.
"? So SG must be compelled to drive to and enter your personal residence, must be compelled to do so by State?
JY - yes State should compel, race/religion/culture is against LGBT"

glad this point (of JY's intent) was made clear

Maniak · 12/07/2019 23:48

Maybe she doesn't want to face questions from jy.

GCAcademic · 12/07/2019 23:47

Someone please tell me there was a bit earlier on where her right to just not touch anyones genitals that SHE doesn't want to touch was discussed (regardless of what any man might think)?

Unless I missed it, the entire argument revolved around (a) what her (father's) religion decrees and (b) what her husband would permit.

TheClitterati · 12/07/2019 23:45

Absolutely popchyk

Ineedacupofteadesperately · 12/07/2019 23:44

It feels like the men are arguing in court over whether the woman is private property (of her husband and father) or public property (JY).

Spot on. I've read some of it but not all and I'm not sure I can face the rest. Someone please tell me there was a bit earlier on where her right to just not touch anyones genitals that SHE doesn't want to touch was discussed (regardless of what any man might think)?

GCAcademic · 12/07/2019 23:42

That's it, in a nutshell, Popchyk. So fucking depressing. The most "progressive" country in the world looks positively medieval.

Maniak · 12/07/2019 23:42

@Popchyk

At least the Member is the one in charge and she is a woman.

GoodyMog · 12/07/2019 23:38

Popchyk - yep, it's one hell of an example of patriarchy in action

dontdoxmeeither · 12/07/2019 23:37

Also (and I really don't mean this as flippantly as it may read, given my last post)

waves to Kiwi Farms thank you for all that you do on this, especially the archiving 😉

dontdoxmeeither · 12/07/2019 23:34

@ahumanfemale your post made me well up. You're right. It was a small thing that was "hers" 😪😪😪 I'm so upset

Popchyk · 12/07/2019 23:28

It feels like the men are arguing in court over whether the woman is private property (of her husband and father) or public property (Yaniv).

And when the case is settled, the woman will do as the victor directs her to do. Because of course she has no agency of her own.

TheClitterati · 12/07/2019 23:17

Ah thank you. I've been following her since she first started reporting which explains why I've not noticed any difference.

GCAcademic · 12/07/2019 23:13

@TheClitterati - basically her Tweets are publicly visible now, whereas for a while they were only visible to those following her:

mobile.twitter.com/goinglikeelsie

noraclavicle · 12/07/2019 23:12

Because JY believes in JY's role as a lightning rod for human rights reform

JY doesn’t believe this. They enjoy the attention they’re getting from the fact that they can manipulate and gaslight naive fuckwits into believing they’re doing all this for ‘humanitarian’ reasons. The fact that this monumental bullshit is being enabled by Canadian authorities is a big fucking neon sign and earsplitting klaxon as to where we’re heading if we don’t stand shoulder-to-shoulder against this.

hoteltango · 12/07/2019 23:08

That's it in a nutshell, ahumanfemale.

bettybeans · 12/07/2019 23:07

I don't have the words to adequately express my disgust for JY or for the system that facilitates putting a woman through something like this. It's abhorrent. If this doesn't go the way it should it'll be devastating but you have to hope that, in that worst case scenario, it at least opens some eyes and casts some sunlight and scrutiny on this subject in Canada,

JY is ruining her life because she doesn't want to touch his fucking penis. So livid.

TheClitterati · 12/07/2019 23:07

@GCAcademic can you explain what unprotected/ protected tweets are please? I find twitter difficult sometimes.

Been following the reporting with interest though.

ahumanfemale · 12/07/2019 23:03

We have a woman who is truly oppressed by her sex being further oppressed because of her sex by someone who uses that sex to claim ultimate victimhood, which can only be done because he's not of that sex.

GCAcademic · 12/07/2019 23:01

The person tweeting about this case has unprotected her tweets again.

ahumanfemale · 12/07/2019 23:01

That poor woman. She had something that was "hers", something she could do, she could be proud of, interact with other people (women) earn some money for herself and have pride in herself and that fucking wankstain took it all away.

And not only that, there's not a chance in hell that any woman similarly controlled by her male family members will be able to do this sort of work once word gets out - if it hasn't already.

And the feet on the chair. Disgusting in every understanding of it.

DuMondeB · 12/07/2019 22:48

Snippet of a KF post from earlier today:

Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (Thread title edited by MNHQ)
littlbrowndog · 12/07/2019 22:45

Kiwi farms. They on top of this

endofthelinefinally · 12/07/2019 22:44

Is there anywhere to read the latest reports?

VaggieMight · 12/07/2019 22:42

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at poster's request.

Swipe left for the next trending thread