Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (Thread title edited by MNHQ)

994 replies

Whackitupto200 · 08/07/2019 09:27

JY’s parent sounds like an absolute loon. It would explain a lot.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1147905523347365888.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
FannyCann · 17/07/2019 10:01

Can the lawyer Cameron not request medical evidence? It could be subject to privacy and for the court only couldn't it?

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 17/07/2019 09:57

I wonder what misconduct JY is alleging?

Having a good working knowledge of the law?

Asking questions while being a lawyer?

Popchyk · 17/07/2019 09:47

Astonishing. And chilling.

The most extraordinary thing about it all is what The Member lets the Y family get away with.

Today is when JY comes up against Jay Cameron, the lawyer for the Justice Centre again, isn't it?

And JY has said that JY wants half a million in compensation against JC for misconduct.

TirisfalPumpkin · 17/07/2019 09:43

Trying very hard to refrain from making a ‘member’ pun.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 17/07/2019 09:42

Why did someone now say ‘periods? How does that work exactly? Do please explain...’

Cloudyz7 · 17/07/2019 09:41

If JY does indeed possess both male & female genitalia, then that would make JY intersex. So why aren't they fighting for intersex rights?

Or if JY does indeed have periods, then it would mean that JY has a functioning female reproductive systems which would by most people's definition make them a women. So what makes them trans?

MrsBertBibby · 17/07/2019 09:21

I do wish someone would just wax JY's balls like they would do a bikini wax, right there in court, so the Member could see just how JY likes it. And how "gender affirming" it is.

Might actually justify an ambulance trip for JY for once.

dontdoxmeeither · 17/07/2019 09:02

I agree that the physical aspects need to be properly established! It's crucial to the case surely?? And if we, as bystanders, jump on that immediately then why on EARTH hasn't the "member"?

It should have been a case of "Whoah, hang on...backtrack/clarify/ask specific questions" HmmConfusedConfusedConfused

Datun · 17/07/2019 08:50

Me too FannyCann.

You can't start asserting that you have periods, which would explain tampaxes and questioning girls (it doesn't but you know what I mean), if you don't.

And you can't start asserting that someone won't wax you because you're trans, when it's because you've got a penis!

It says they are 'sworn in'. Does that mean they have to swear to tell the truth? Because surely, establishing whether or not they are telling the truth, is fundamental?

It sounds shambolic.

FannyCann · 17/07/2019 08:46

I think the member/judge should adjourn all proceedings and ask for a full medical and psychiatric reports. Establishing for once and for all the precise genital arrangement as well as other aspects relevant to this and future cases.

happydappy2 · 17/07/2019 08:45

The irony in JY complaining that if religion trumps trans rights, then trans rights are meaningless......Yes and if any man can claim to be a woman then womens rights are meaningless!

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 17/07/2019 08:43

I’ve tried to read the tweet thread and it’s too he’d to follow! The three of them sound nuts. Which country are they threatening to flounce off to?

Datun · 17/07/2019 08:40

Has it not been established that JY has a penis and testicles? Which is the reason they won't do the waxing?

As far as I know, there is no intersex condition that will give you a uterus, and therefore periods, and a penis?

So why are they getting away with that statement re periods?

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 17/07/2019 08:31

I’ve never had my nethers waxed. Never ever, not a chance. Don’t feel the need.

KettlePolly · 17/07/2019 08:30

The period comment floored me. They are obsessed. Such clear AGP fetishistic obsession with women's bodily functions. Whilst waxing someone's eyebrows or arms won't be much different between male and female, in the circumstances it would seem urgent to establish what genitals they have as it's a totally different texture of skin, and testicles and penises would be wrecked by the usual Hollywood vulva treatment.

arranbubonicplague · 17/07/2019 08:10

I've a feeling it was a case of giving someone enough rope to hang themselves!

It's interesting because my apprehension is that the member will argue that JY's comments about race and faith will be set aside, no matter, how rebarbative, because that is not the human rights issue in question here.

Of course, in the English courts, we have Maria McLachlan denied a financial award for her assault because she refuse to abide by the court's ruling for the naming/gendering of her attacker. And, the Lion of London Bridge, will not receive Criminal Injuries Compensation because of his documented convictions for crimes based on race/faith harassment.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7248059/Lion-London-Bridge-denied-compensation-injuries-criminal-record.html

I see from that series of tweets that JY has filed fresh complaints. We won't ever know but I wonder what the settlements JY has won in mediation are.

FannyCann · 17/07/2019 08:06

They may not be well, but they’re also spiteful grifters.

The future does not bode well whatever the outcome of this case. They will continue to be a thorn in the side of the city of Vancouver or wherever else they go for as long as they live. No one is safe from them. Any government agency, from social services to health services to the young waitress in a coffee bar who accidentally misgenders or otherwise gives offence. Beauticians are particularly at risk - the manicurist who is happy to take a deep breath and do the toes but when asked declines to do massage or wax.

It will continue unabated as long as they have access to these tribunals. Should the creepy behaviour escalate into crime then they will end up in a women's prison, causing grief to everyone there.

I don't know what else to say except thank God it's all happening somewhere else and not here.

DanaPhoenix · 17/07/2019 08:05

Oh dear I've self reported my last post if that is the case.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 17/07/2019 08:03

Periods - how? Are his parents... hmmm I can’t even finish this sentence without being horrible. Educationally challenges? I haven’t read the whole threads but are both parents as batshit?

How is this being taken seriously? Why are comedy shows not taking the piss? This really is comedy gold.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 17/07/2019 08:02

Turned face to the wall, I'd say.

ExhaustedGrinch · 17/07/2019 07:53

I wonder what happened to the other parent. - According to a tweet I'd seen other parent died some years back.

I'm so astonished at the blatant racism, I did wonder why member didn't stop them but I've a feeling it was a case of giving someone enough rope to hang themselves!

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 17/07/2019 07:49

I've given way and gone over to see what the farmers were saying. Re claim that all this time in court is costing the litigator a lot of money, as litigator can earn three figure sums per day, one person says:

$000 is the same amount of money as $0. The math works.

Grin
HouseOfMouse · 17/07/2019 07:37

I did find it hilarious (given the context) that JY’s parent kept misgendering them.

JoyceJeffries · 17/07/2019 07:34

If JY has had periods since he was 13 why was he asking about how to insert a tampon into a 10yr old girl(s)?

DanaPhoenix · 17/07/2019 07:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.