I want it to be multi-coloured patchwork, like Elmer.
But I'm not quite sure where you're coming from on this one, DJ. Do you have something in mind? Or do you want us to have a think and see if anything springs to our minds (in which case, much as I like many of your contributions to this board, this particular thread has a bit of a feel of those ones where some random comes on here and says "Contentious twaddle blah! DISCUSS!" as if we were a sixth form debating society). Hope that doesn't come across as mardy on my part... but I'd like a bit more of a steer on where you're trying to go with this one.
And what sort of feminism? For 3rd wave feminism it would pretty obviously be "Men". The whole thing calls itself feminism, but is built round pandering to men.
Liberal feminism (in the true sense of old fashioned liberal philosophy, not the new, bastardised version which is highly individualistic and probably closer to libertarianism): probably being frightened of biology, as if acknowledging that women run 100m slower than men will bring the whole edifice of feminism tumbling round our ears.
Radical feminism: great at shifting the Overton window, but I think its elephant is possibly that while great at critiquing power, because it consciously eschews playing within the patriarchal power structures that dominate society, it kind of opts out of being able to effect any genuine change. (In that sense, I think for all its flaws, liberal feminism probably gets more accomplished).