Lancaster Pride 19 Expose

Please be accepting of peoples rights not to engage.

Nope sorry. You don't get to say that a bunch of women have 'bigoted views' and then when asked to expand on that tell me that it's your right 'not to engage'.

Please be accepting of peoples rights not to engage

You can stop engaging at any point, but if you do engage you need to explain why you think 'fake' lesbians are ones born with vaginas, but 'real' ones are ones born with penises and how that works exactly.

Bespin
I'd really like you to explain why trans people will be marginalised by Lesbians refusing to have sex with men. Lesbians are female homosexuals so they have sex with other women.

I have no issue with someone standing there expressing their beliefs, as much as i might disagree with them. There right does not trump others right to stand in front of them with other banners showing the opposite view.

So taller men get to stand in front of shorter 'fake' lesbian women?

And you can't see this as a problem with women and their rights to demonstrate?

And can you clarify that you think 'fake' lesbians were ones born with vaginas, whereas 'real' ones were born with penises please. It was you that called them fake so explain yourself.

Please be accepting of peoples rights not to engage.

You are engaging, that is what you are doing on this thread.

What i hope is that you are not and that society on the whole is moving towards acceptance.

Acceptance of what?

Acceptance of penis by lesbians?

Thanks for that explanation about the double post.

100%

Eaudear

What i said is that i was not answering your question as the right to free speech also gives me the right not to answer. Please be accepting of peoples rights not to engage. As people keep saying on this forum you don't have to engage in topics you don't want too.

maybe there view is not the one that is prevailing in society

I once stood outside of Tesco's and asked everyone who came out where they shop...

Turns out q00% of the population shop at Tesco.

I have no issue with someone standing there expressing their beliefs, as much as i might disagree with them. There right does not trump others right to stand in front of them with other banners showing the opposite view. if the number of people with the opposite view is much larger than theirs, then maybe there view is not the one that is prevailing in society. we could use other equality issues to demonstrate this point. Were the group often starts out small then builds if that is the prevailing view of society. I am hoping your view is not that, but i'm fully aware it could be and that trans people will continue to be a marginalised section of society. What i hope is that you are not and that society on the whole is moving towards acceptance.

Didn't you read their post sackrifice?

Bespin doesn't think they need to justify or back up their views.

Bespin, can you clarify that you think 'fake' lesbians are ones born with vaginas, and 'real' ones are ones born with penises please.

Thanks.

Oh nice one, Bespin 😂
'It's people's right to do that as long as they don't hurt other peopoe while doing so*
So, what's the problem then? How does carrying a banner stating the dictionary definition of lesbianism hurt anyone?

thanks haworthia much appreciated

Apologies Bespin. Blame my skim reading!

hi rufus thank you for the clarity, it was getting a bit tin foil hat then. of course people on here dont use sock accounts lol

Haworthia

have you read the posts someone as taken my post and said the opposite to it. so what you are saying is that, that person is not GC but is a sock of a trans person. lol

Grammar

More of a spelling mistake to be fair

I think you’ve accidentally outed your sockpuppet account, Bespin

No they haven’t

Another poster was correcting bespins grammer

Exactly fermats

Funny that

I think you’ve accidentally outed your sockpuppet account, Bespin.

Because it’s pesky women daring to reject penises. It’s perfectly okay for a penis bearer to reject all vaginas. Fanfares at the ready. But vice versa noooooooo, be off with you.

As a straight woman (who likes penis very, very much, and therefore has no difficulty whatsoever in understanding the concept of being a lesbian and liking vulva just as much as I like penis) I'm still baffled as to why Pride is no longer welcoming of women who are same-sex attracted.

No-one's saying you can't be "pansexual" and like whatever combination of genitals and "gender presentation" does it for you. Be that, celebrate that.

But why prevent a historically oppressed minority from celebrating their sexuality? And why only lesbians? (Well, we all know the answer to that. Same reason prostate cancer campaigns aren't talking about "prostate havers", and men's sexual health campaigns aren't talking about "penis havers". Good old misogynistic double standards in action yet again.)

Sorry by 'fake' lesbians you mean the ones born with vaginas now?

And not the ones born with penises?