Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lancaster Pride 19 Expose

139 replies

Lucky222 · 29/06/2019 23:13

twitter.com/ReSistersU

What happens when a group of lesbian show up on the steps of Lancaster Town hall on Pride day with megaphone and banners emblazoned with the words 'Lesbians don't have penises' & 'Lesbian = female homoSEXual ?

Find out tomorrow when Resisters United release our side of the story.

Thread will be updated in real time tomorrow. Twitter users please retweet.

Many thanks.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
ADropofReality · 30/06/2019 11:00

No sorry Eaudear if thats ok with you. its my view and i dont feel that it needs to be justified, just as i am not asking you to justify yours.

Your point of view is absolutely and objectively wrong, so no, don't bother justifying it. Your point of view is beyond loathsome, so either change it or go and hang your head in shame.

Juells · 30/06/2019 10:59

Wail....I want to know what happened in Lancaster

sackrifice · 30/06/2019 10:55

the idea of the cotton ceiling was not created by us, its a term that was used by GC people and was perpetuated by them

Lesbians did not create the term Cotton Ceiling.

The do not use their knickers to keep men out.

How in any way can you type this absolute nonsense.

Unless you are a gender critical plant trying to show up the Trans Agenda for what it is.

In which case, keep up the good work.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:53

SpitefulBreasts

There not we have never said that they are, the idea of the cotton ceiling was not created by us, its a term that was used by GC people and was perpetuated by them. I am always sad when younger trans people take this on, as in reality it is not true. Thats not to say that some people dont try to have sex with people and dont like being turned down. But it is not a systemic thing within trans communities. Some people are idiots no matter there gender.

SpitefulBreasts · 30/06/2019 10:46

Bespin
Well, that's an answer, but it's not the answer to the question I asked. Please try and explain how trans people are affected and marginalised by Lesbian women not wanting to have sex with men.

LangCleg · 30/06/2019 10:45

the 5% with all the wealth and power

These are the people who are backing the extremist trans agenda.

RandomMess · 30/06/2019 10:45

Why does anyone have the right to dictate to someone else who they find sexually attractive?

Some people have very "sick" sexual attractions ie children. It is illegal for them to act on it (thank goodness) but that is who/what they are attracted to...

I am attracted to some men, would it be ok to say I have to be attracted to woman? To say I have to be attracted to transwomen? To say that I have to be attracted to all men?

LangCleg · 30/06/2019 10:44

There not marginalising trans people by not sleeping with them

Right. So if they are protesting the cotton ceiling and you agree that refusing the cotton ceiling is not marginalising trans people, why would trans people feel the need to counter protest them?

Riddle me that one, Bespin.

sackrifice · 30/06/2019 10:44

wearing a balaclava not a criminal offence, smoke bombs, a bit harder as maybe seen as an offence if causing injury, was there an injury? I dont know i was not there so hard to tell.

It's this that abusers use as a tactic to pretend they are not abusing their victims.

I can't see bruises, can you see bruises, well if neither of us can see bruises then nothing could have happened right?

EmpressLesbianInChair · 30/06/2019 10:44

What happens when the men kick their steps out from underneath them

then they have committed a criminal offence

What happens if a man claiming to be a woman attacks a woman in a women’s toilet?

then they have committed a criminal offence

Yes.... I definitely see a parallel here. And the women can ‘just report it’ and everything will be fine. Hmm

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:43

Almost as if there is some privilege going on here.

You know that idea when people feel that the state is controlled by 0.5% of the population in a marginalised group when it is clearly controlled by the 5% with all the wealth and power.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:41

I don't see anyone ever charged for the balaclava and smoke bombs that have previously been displayed by these 'real' lesbians. Do you?

wearing a balaclava not a criminal offence, smoke bombs, a bit harder as maybe seen as an offence if causing injury, was there an injury? I dont know i was not there so hard to tell.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:39

SpitefulBreasts

There not marginalising trans people by not sleeping with them, people that say that are wrong. happy now.

sackrifice · 30/06/2019 10:39

then they have committed a criminal offence.

I don't see anyone ever charged for the balaclava and smoke bombs that have previously been displayed by these 'real' lesbians. Do you?

And yet, people have been visited by the police and held in cells for 'misgendering'.

Almost as if there is some privilege going on here.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:36

What happens when the men kick their steps out from underneath them

then they have committed a criminal offence.

SpitefulBreasts · 30/06/2019 10:36

Bespin
You still haven't explained how Lesbians are marginalising trans people by refusing to have sex with men.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:35

Eaudear

Exactly, you are getting it now though i would watch your language as this forum as rules so there are limits on the levels of free speech here and i would not want you over stepping them.

LangCleg · 30/06/2019 10:34

I'd really like you to explain why trans people will be marginalised by Lesbians refusing to have sex with men.

Yes, let's have it.

sackrifice · 30/06/2019 10:33

And you haven't cleared up the belief that these lesbianis are 'fake' whereas the taller, more muscley, beardy ones standing in front of them are the 'real' ones.

sackrifice · 30/06/2019 10:32

So the people could have brought a set of steps to be above the people stood in front of them. They didn't, that is not the fault of the people standing in front of them next time bring steps or bigger poles for banners just an idea.

So women now need extra equipment to be brought along, to be higher than the tall men that will stand in front of them in order to even have the right to protest.

What happens when the men kick their steps out from underneath them, or put balaclavas on and harass them, or let off smoke bombs to disperse them? Should they have also brought along security, and gas masks? Is it their fault for not being properly equipped to protest their own rights?

Eaudear · 30/06/2019 10:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:29

sorry that was alsort of messy spelling lol

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:28

Eaudear
Your really not understanding the idea of free speech are you. That is exactly what i have the right to do, because i hope a point of view and i do not have to justify that point of view. Im sorry you dont want to accept the concept of free speech.

NeurotrashWarrior · 30/06/2019 10:27

I was pointing out it's all a matter of perception.

Except that if there's only 8-10 lesbians, you know, the L in LGBT, they're clearly being oppressed and ignored.

Pride should be well proud of itself.

Bespin · 30/06/2019 10:26

sackrifice

Heres the thing about protest you get to protest but you do not get to do it how you want to always. Like in london the state limit it as you dont get to stand in certain places. So the people could have brought a set of steps to be above the people stood in front of them. They didn't, that is not the fault of the people standing in front of them next time bring steps or bigger poles for banners just an idea.

Swipe left for the next trending thread