Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

BBC books sack Dr Who writer for being GC

29 replies

BreakWindandFire · 04/06/2019 14:44

Gareth Roberts is a sci-fi author who has written quite a few Dr Who stories. He's a gay Tory Brexiter, so probably unusual with regard to his politics in the sci-fi sphere.

He was commissioned to write for a Dr Who anthology produced by BBC books. After submitting his contribution he's just been sacked.

Why? Because he's vocally GC on twitter.

A section of the Dr Who fandom agitated for my removal. Also, some of the other contributing authors to the book (I don’t know who) threatened to withdraw if I was involved. BBC Books immediately folded to these demands.

Anyone wanting to view his gender heresy can read his statement here:

medium.com/@zmangareth/statement-on-bbc-books-and-transgenderism-dd7ad0c9231a

Some have urged me to make a full, obeisant apology. Even if I was inclined to, I don’t think it would have any effect at all – for example, Helen Lewis of The New Statesman is currently being monstered for the most careful, respectful piece on this issue. I’m not bothered very much by words though I’m bothered when they distress my friends and family. But then, that’s how intimidation works. That’s why intimidators intimidate. (And I know for a fact it would be much worse for a woman in this position.)

For the record this is my opinion on transgenderism and its ideology, with no humour or irony attached.

I’ve rejected restrictive cultural gender stereotypes for as long as I can remember. I consider them to be very often harmful and constricting, especially for girls and women. The culture I enjoy most and the artists I like most are people who laugh at, bend and play with these roles.

I don’t believe in gender identity. It is impossible for a person to change their biological sex. I don’t believe anybody is born in the wrong body.

I think it’s wrong to – write a falsehood into law; compel people by law to speak words they do not believe; rewrite the law to remove women’s biological sex-based rights and protections; reinforce gender stereotypes; medicalise children who don’t conform to gender stereotypes. That’s it.

I don’t believe my view should be protected either. People must be protected, ideas must never be. I would ask the writers who objected to my inclusion in the same book as them to reflect on that.

OP posts:
lorit · 04/06/2019 15:15

That's terrible.

I'm incredibly impressed that he's tried to stand up to the bullies there though.

Coyoacan · 04/06/2019 15:08

Gggrrrr

ZebrasAreBras · 04/06/2019 14:50

Well that's shit, isn't it.

I think it’s wrong to – write a falsehood into law; compel people by law to speak words they do not believe; rewrite the law to remove women’s biological sex-based rights and protections; reinforce gender stereotypes; medicalise children who don’t conform to gender stereotypes. That’s it.

That just sums it up in a nutshell. Perfectly put.

Sarahjconnor · 04/06/2019 14:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Swipe left for the next trending thread