The UK Womb Transplant research team hypothesise that whilst there are additional anatomical, hormonal, fertility, and obstetric complexities, modification to the surgical technique can still make the technique feasible in transgender women
a) 'additional complexities'? Yep, like having a female body.
b) Let's do the 'Barracker-application' to this statement (the new Bechedel Test barometer!). modifcation to the surgical technique can still make the technique feasible in males Only males can be transgender women. The statement is saying implanting uteri in MALES.
b) I'm not usually a fan of the 'i could identify as a table' analogy, but in this case, just because it's an aspiration, why does it have to be an ambition?
If in certain academic spaces speculation escalates into the possibility of performing uterine transplants into robots should we as a society ethically chase that speculation to its end goal? Speculation of human uterine transplants into men (same thing as the 1st, just different words)?
Speculation of human uterine transplants into...etc etc?
Whose 'speculation' are we entertaining here, and why?