Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Karen Ingala Smith in Parliament now on single sex refuges

160 replies

Anlaf · 22/05/2019 10:32

She's excellent, as i think is Jess Philips. Karen's talking v movingly of the challenges in offering women only refuge services, the two boroughs where her organisation has had pushback already for not being inclusive enough, and in assessing male-born people for risk in accessing female services

Watch live:

parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/0d07ff13-636e-4b51-a946-2877e583dc4c

Lots of handwaving from one Maria Miller

OP posts:
S1naidSucks · 25/05/2019 17:42

*As for sex toys on train James. Well James was really looked like trying to intimidate Janet by staring at her•

Well to be fair, James was probably feeling rather ‘frustrated’, what with not being able to watch porn/buy sex aids, on James’ way to a discussion on the rights of abused women. The poor ‘most oppressed’ type of person that James is, compared to those silly complaining women with their * privilege. So sad.

Birdsfoottrefoil · 25/05/2019 17:36

Porn shaming? Since when did it stop being appropriate to shame anyone watching porn (or looking for sex toys) in a public place?

littlbrowndog · 25/05/2019 16:51

Agree on Janet. She was awful. Women’s aid and doesn’t even know what a woman actually is

It was good to watch. Karen was awesome. She was taking any of the TWAW shite from anyone

Imagine women’s ai£ not having a policy.

And when Karen told the Scottish woman. NO I don’t accept that language and yes I do have a problem with that language

As for sex toys on train James. Well James was really looked like trying to intimidate Janet by staring at her

Anyway. It was good to see Karen standing up for the adult human females who have to go to a refuge and centring them

KittensinaBlender · 25/05/2019 10:26

Janet McDermott just seemed utterly vapid. Couldn’t make a concise point about anything and fawning over the man sat next to her.

I was just waiting for her to suggest trust falls and singing Cumbauya as measures to combat women’s unease - useless.

Erythronium · 24/05/2019 23:15

Janet McDermott smiles, giggles and plays with her scarf as she sells women down the river to the man sitting next to her.

Erythronium · 24/05/2019 22:33

Watching this now. Janet McDermott is very irritating. She waffles but with nothing useful to say.

Satterthwaite · 24/05/2019 20:23

Thanks for clarification Smile

PencilsInSpace · 24/05/2019 19:29

And what is the constant talk of BME women...it's not the fucking same!!!

To be fair, some of the discussion around BAME women was to do with the important Southall Black Sisters court case in 2008 - back when EHRC were still doing useful stuff:

southallblacksisters.org.uk/campaigns/save-sbs-campaign-2008/

The case was important for all specialist services including single sex services. IMO it put a major brake on local authorities just funding the cheapest, most 'inclusive' bids.

Some of the discussion was more of the same old 'TWAW like black women are women' racist BS, however. I think it was the WA woman who said the important thing about SBS was that BAME women had a choice to go to specialist BAME women's services or mainstream women's services, with the implication that tw should have the choice to use women's services or specialist trans services.

theOtherPamAyres · 24/05/2019 19:12

Angela [didn't catch her last name] ....

That would be Angela Crawley, SNP, a lesbian. She won her seat narrowly in the last General Election.

In March or April, when the SNP were reported to be split on the question of whether TWAW, Crawley tweeted a photo of the Trans Flag and the words "Trans Ally". She wrote words along the lines of : "To be clear, I'll just leave this flag here"

In other words, she declared that she favoured the side that asserted that TWAW and did not stand with Joan McAlpine.

She got flak for that tweet. People expect a member of the Select Committee to be impartial, questioning and open-minded - not a friggin' ally of one side or the other.

She looked and sounded out of her depth in the session, I thought.

MsJeminaPuddleduck · 24/05/2019 18:29

Callmejudith - yep and lesbians. Even Janet who said she was a lesbian.

Upzadaizy · 24/05/2019 18:26

Karen Ingala Smith was magnificent and awesome. So clear, so logical, so consistent. She had prepared extraordinarily well.

I want to be like her when I grow up.

I thought Sarah Champion was simpatico, but I couldn't work out what Angela [didn't catch her last name] was trying to get at. I suspect she's drunk the TRA kool-aid.

JackyHolyoake · 24/05/2019 17:21

Yes, James being on that panel probably thought it was going to be a women's space and failing to realise that the mere fact of James' presence means it can never be a women's space and immediately becomes a mixed sex space. [Obviously, James was spectacularly unable to intimidate KIS, who was brilliantly assertive. Thank you Karen!]

This is something that these AGP males always fail to understand. They can never be in a female space by virtue of their presence. The only time any space is female space is when there are no males of any kind within it. Their fantasy is unattainable on so many levels.

Trousering · 24/05/2019 17:15

Jess Phillips worked in business development, not front line services. Her job was bidding for funding, so no, she would not need to do anything with victims from her head office desk.

Callmejudith · 24/05/2019 17:04

And what is the constant talk of BME women...it's not the fucking same!!!

Callmejudith · 24/05/2019 17:03

Jemima I thought that was odd too. Jess Phillips said she'd never done a police check on a victim. Does DJ only do them on TW then?

MsJeminaPuddleduck · 24/05/2019 16:39

By odd stuff I'm particularly thinking of the exchange around the police checks and no immediate referrals (refuge for vulnerable women??) and the part where part where DJ needed several prompts to click that the question of impact also involved the impact of the TW on the women in the refuge rather than just the TW

MsJeminaPuddleduck · 24/05/2019 16:36

I would like to know what the meeting would have been like without DJ

Me too. Particularly Janet.

Can't be often that a volunteer to resents an organisation in a parliamentary committee and yet Janet, the experienced professional seemed to be tripping over herself to not to say the wrong thing whereas DJ said some pretty odd stuff, yet with complete authority

R0wantrees · 24/05/2019 16:35

Callmejudith

I thought it was very noticeable the impact that this had on the discussion.

Callmejudith · 24/05/2019 16:23

With the exception of KIS they are all TERRIFIED of using the wrong language

Callmejudith · 24/05/2019 16:18

Thank you OP, I had no idea this was happening I've just watched the whole thing.

I would like to know what the meeting would have been like without DJ

cwg1 · 24/05/2019 15:11

BettyFloot that's so deeply moving - women survivors and their concern and empathy for others Flowers

R0wantrees · 24/05/2019 13:03

Apologies, I was referring to Diane James (DJ)

Diana James, Volunteer, Cornwall Refuge Trust Women’s Refuge & Norda House Men’s Refuge

SpartacusAutisticusAHF · 24/05/2019 13:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Satterthwaite · 24/05/2019 12:59

Remind me who MJ is? I get them muddled up watching on a small phone screen

R0wantrees · 24/05/2019 12:49

MJ was very hard to take seriously on any level, especially watching whilst knowing what MJ had been thinking about on the journey. Many of MJ's points were well off and it made me wonder exactly what MJ's volunteer role is, as MJ seemed to have no clue about refuge operations, referrals, risk assessment, safeguarding and so on.

SpartacusAutisticusAHF I had the same thoughts. I think the transcript will be useful as there were a number of points made which rang bells for me.