Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Original poster

Expert professional Dr Ray Blanchard's twitter account has been locked

172 replies

kesstrel · 12/05/2019 09:12

twitter.com/BJontry/status/1127388515606482944

OP posts:
DpWm · 12/05/2019 09:55

Women can't have autogynephilia because they already have a vagina.

DpWm · 12/05/2019 09:53

Gammon
Whaa I think you're barking up the wrong tree, it's TRAs saying those things not Datun
Ask them for "the paper" Confused

Datun · 12/05/2019 09:53

GammonNosher

No, not that women have it too. That TRAs claim women have it.

Women don't have it.

GammonNosher · 12/05/2019 09:52

Obviously I am Lang. That's evident from my post.

NannyRed · 12/05/2019 09:49

@Genderfreelass I think you had it right the first time! Definitely more twatter than Twitter about this.

LangCleg · 12/05/2019 09:49

What does it look like when a adult human female has it? Could I have it?

Are you an adult human female?

GammonNosher · 12/05/2019 09:48

I don't really understand sorry. You mentioned that women have it too and that's really new and interesting information! Do you have a link?

Datun · 12/05/2019 09:46

What does it look like when a adult human female has it?

Awks I believe. Since it was about wearing their own clothes, not those of men Grin

GammonNosher · 12/05/2019 09:41

Ooooh that's something I didn't know. So autogynephilia is rare? So presumably rarer than being trans?

What does it look like when a adult human female has it? Could I have it?

Do you have the paper?

Genderfreelass · 12/05/2019 09:39

Blanchards findings were rejected by who?TRAS? His findings are still widely considered valid.

HandsOffMyRights · 12/05/2019 09:39

So Twitter now silencing the professionals because of scientific research. Welcome to 1984.

Datun · 12/05/2019 09:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

GammonNosher · 12/05/2019 09:32

Wait was it opinions or factual claims that they came down on? Or neither? Twitter is confusing.

ZuttZeVootEeeVro · 12/05/2019 09:30

Stopping people expressing opinions isn't a bad superpower for the most marginalized people in society.

GammonNosher · 12/05/2019 09:29

I don't think they can strike off Blanchard is the thing, his findings were rejected outright after all and he isn't practicing in the same manner. I'm sure They'd treat him the same way if necessary.

GeordieGenes · 12/05/2019 09:24

Who is AW?

NeurotrashWarrior · 12/05/2019 09:23

No, it's twatter. No typo there.

NeurotrashWarrior · 12/05/2019 09:22

Eh? AW was completely discredited and struck off.

This is a non professionally regulated company deciding to promote double think and ignore science.

Really not the same at all!

Genderfreelass · 12/05/2019 09:22

*Twitter

Genderfreelass · 12/05/2019 09:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

GammonNosher · 12/05/2019 09:19

Reminds me of when they dogpiled Andrew Wakefield

Sexnotgender · 12/05/2019 09:13

Idiots.