Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Maya Forstater

689 replies

DianeBrewster · 05/05/2019 09:40

MN have deleted the thread started by Maya - who lost her job for speaking up for women- because it talks about her crowdfunding for legal costs

Here is today's times article on the case https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tax-expert-fired-for-saying-trans-women-aren-t-women-tpqgnm9vj?shareToken=3f12f5cae61c02fd41040eb816fd37b4&wgu=2705255426441557045162977940f0d76fa1&wgexpiry=1564821162&utmmsource=planit&utmmedium=affiliate&utmm_content=22278

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
BoreOfWhabylon · 05/05/2019 11:08

This is such an important case and Maya is a brave woman.

Imnobody4 · 05/05/2019 11:00

I thought capitalism wasn't the road to serfdom. Bloody international companies acting like they own the bodies and souls of their employees. Governments legislating to curb freedom of speech. We are seriously on the edge of a new dark age. Respect for Maya.

littlbrowndog · 05/05/2019 10:58

But I wouldn’t expect them to get the sack for that

Bluestitch · 05/05/2019 10:58

Yep. Green's argument might hold some weight if it was policy that no public opinions about changes in law/ policy were allowed. But we all know that this happened because Maya dared to have the 'wrong' opinion about a policy. Of course if Green can point me to anywhere that anybody has lost their job for saying TWAW and therefore being exclusive of GC women I will immediately apologise.

emerencealwayshopeful · 05/05/2019 10:58

Well here is more evidence that we are only allowed opinions if they are the 'approved' ones.

Behind you Maya. And all the way to the top. You weren't fired for having a public opinion but because some didn't think that it was acceptable for you to hold and share that opinion.

littlbrowndog · 05/05/2019 10:58

Yeah they would probably get a stonewall inclusivity badge. Despite the fact I find that view offensive to me as a woman

Floisme · 05/05/2019 10:56

From CGB's own website, presented without comment:
Our scholars conduct rigorous, impartial analysis informed by evidence and experts from around the world, to shape intellectual debate

HumberElla · 05/05/2019 10:54

Quite Blue. I wouldn’t expect someone to get the sack for saying TWAW. Even though the vast majority of the population would disagree and I find it offensive. It is perfectly ok for people to hold a view others find offensive.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 05/05/2019 10:51

It isn't controversial to say humans don't change sex. It certainly isn't controversial to state the fact that women are a biological reality and not defined by a feeling in a man's head of what we should be and how we should think. This is all just highlighting the repressive, woman-hating nature of the TRA movement. I really hope Maya's employers are held to account for their treatment of her, treatment that reflects their contempt for all women.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 05/05/2019 10:50

Don't worry Datun, I know x

Bluestitch · 05/05/2019 10:49

There's not a chance Maya would have been sacked if she'd publicly reached a different conclusion about GRA reform.

HumberElla · 05/05/2019 10:47

Freedom of speech it balanced by your responsibility for what ypu put out there

So does this apply during a government consultation about the Specific topic in question? Green you are basically telling women that it is their own fault if they get the sack for discussing their views, when invited to do so by government, in a democracy, over a point of law.

You appear to have a very disturbing and rather limited approach to Free Speech.

Datun · 05/05/2019 10:46

Plus, if this doesn't go the way it should, Maya can appeal. And appeal. And appeal.

Let this go right the way up the food chain as high as possible, so the entire planet gets to hear what's at stake.

littlbrowndog · 05/05/2019 10:46

And I control all the budget in my household of 4.

littlbrowndog · 05/05/2019 10:44

Yeah twitter was just called to account for the way they treat women

Ffs. Why do we hav3 to hid3 when violent tweets stay up that endorse violence against women

With you maya 💪💪

PencilsInSpace · 05/05/2019 10:44

I support Maya. She has done nothing wrong. She has done nothing irresponsible. I am pleased to see so much support for her. I think she has a strong case and the outcome will affect all our rights.

Datun · 05/05/2019 10:44

TheCountessofFitzdotterel

I was agreeing with you there. Me getting frustrated was over green.

Datun · 05/05/2019 10:42

Very different from discussing the ideas in abstract, which was what Maya was doing.

Which the government had invited women everywhere to do. They were expecting speculation over the implications of the GRA. They're telling the electorate to talk about it for fuck's sake.

OldCrone · 05/05/2019 10:42

GreenEggs
Do you think it's a positive thing for people to feel they have to hide behind pseudonyms? Why do you think this? Why are you against freedom of speech? Do you think we would be better off under a dictatorship where freedom of speech was not allowed?

Bluestitch · 05/05/2019 10:41

Freedom of speech it balanced by your responsibility for what ypu put out there

During a public consultation. Greeneggs can I ask- do you think Maya would have lost her job if she had concluded that transwomen were women and posted such?

Datun · 05/05/2019 10:41

Men and women have been doing it for thousands of years. Freedom of speech it balanced by your responsibility for what ypu put out there

Which is why Maya is going to court. She stands by what she says, as do millions of other women.

If maintaining the category of women, and refuting that magic words can make you change sex, is being 'responsible for what you say', then let's shout it from the rooftops.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 05/05/2019 10:40

'A closer example would be an NHS doctor posting they supported Charlie Guard's parents.'

That's a specific case involving particular individuals in a conflicted relationship with the organisation in question. Very different from discussing the ideas in abstract, which was what Maya was doing.

JessicaWakefieldSV · 05/05/2019 10:39

Always good to remember that women control about 80% of UK household spending.

A very important fact. Entirely relevant too.

S1naidSucks · 05/05/2019 10:38

Reads comments from GreenEggsHamandChips goes off to empty savings jar.

For crying out loud Green, I’m supposed to be saving for a house makeover. Give me a break.

LangCleg · 05/05/2019 10:37

Women need to hide their identities in order to partake in a democratic process without repercussions. Is this really your position?

It would seem so. During the period of a government consultation on this specific topic.

Amazing, really, the reaches people will go to to prevent discussion of women's rights and social power dynamics, isn't it?

Always good to remember that women control about 80% of UK household spending. Can't think quite why that may be germane here, but it's certainly worth emphasising.

80%. That's eighty percent.