Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Another women's sport thread.

40 replies

Saltovinegar · 01/05/2019 07:06

Our local radio has just had a piece about the Caster Semenya ruling today. There were various implications stated as to the which way the result went but the last sentence was that it would determine if women's sport was even relevant any more!!!!!

My blood is nearly boiling through the roof especially since Charlie has just made the same statement on BBC breakfast. Ahhhhh

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
TheGoalIsToStayOutOfTheHole · 02/05/2019 02:37

This is a dark day for fairness in sport.

Like hell it is. McKinnon was just creaming themselves that they would be able to beat women even easier with their full T level going. Given they keep claiming testosterone makes absolutely no difference so men should be able to compete with women with no restrictions..unlucky, misogynist.

Saltovinegar · 01/05/2019 17:51

Sorry, didn't mean it to look like I'd abandoned my own thread but can't use a mobile at work.

I have some sympathy for CS but I think it was a fair ruling. Hopefully common sense will start to prevail with respect to women's sport (not holding my breath though).

OP posts:
truthisarevolutionaryact · 01/05/2019 12:02

From the judgement:
on the basis of the evidence submitted by the parties, such discrimination is a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of achieving the IAAF's aim of preserving the integrity of female athletics in the restricted events.

That's a positive statement (unbelievable that I am relieved that it was stated but here we are......)

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 11:58

Sorry - don't mind me, I'll fully read up on the other thread so I understand Blush

Caster Semenya

http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3511026-Caster-Semenya

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 11:53

DrRMk is unhappy, so it's good news for women in sport I'm assuming?
Caster's case was denied. * This is a dark day for fairness in sport.*

I'm not really sure what this means for women in sport, can someone give me a kiss overview?

I do really feel for Semenya as she's been dragged into this as a trans issue really.

GeordieGenes · 01/05/2019 11:22

I do feel bad for Casper as her case is obviously different from trans women.

MockerstheFeManist · 01/05/2019 11:19

CAS backs IAAF but declares "serious concerns."

Semenya will move up to 5k to avoid the rule.

EweSurname · 01/05/2019 11:16

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/48102479

hipsterfun · 01/05/2019 11:13

I just saw in the G that Semenya lost her case...

MockerstheFeManist · 01/05/2019 09:31

Ruliing expected at Noon BST.

CAS tend to give the benefit of the doubt to governing bodies to administer sport as they think fit. They are generally tougher on national governing bodies who attempt to restrict athlete participation, such as when they ruled the BOA could not ban drug cheats for life from the Olympics.

It may or may not be relevant that in the recent SA champs, Semenya moved up to 5000m where the proposed testosterone limits will not apply.

littlbrowndog · 01/05/2019 09:24

Yeah and the outcome shouldn’t be that every women athlete is tested for testosterone.

Cos the varitions can be massive

Yeah girl fuck that shite.

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 09:19

TowelNumber42 that does look more promising Smile

Sebastian's quote worried be for a minute til I got to or a male athlete has over a female athlete,

Let's see what kind of reaction that gets and hope for a sensible outcome on the ruling today.

(I too miss the edit function !)

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 09:14

The push is already underway to remove the trans prefix, the word female is already used by lots of transwomen in their bios and some even say they've always been women.

So littl I don't think we'll even get to be transphobic for very long. There'll be no trans people. I guess they'll decide what our new designation is.

But fuck that shit!

TowelNumber42 · 01/05/2019 09:12

SebastiAn.

See. No proof reading skills ConfusedBlush

TowelNumber42 · 01/05/2019 09:12

That second quote was from Sebastion Coe. I cannot proof read for toffee

TowelNumber42 · 01/05/2019 09:11

GirlDownUnder they seem to be promoting natal women's sport without a trans agenda, as in a pro-women agenda.

I was encouraged by this on the BBC sports website on Semenya This is not a case about transgender. But one of the questions it raises is that transgender athletes - who have transitioned from one gender to another - might ask why they are obliged to alter their hormone levels when DSD athletes are free to compete without doing so.

I'm encouraged because it will stop the red herring of current testosterone levels and get conversation back onto female skeleton shape, bone density, male puberty etc. Basically that men and women have fundamentally different bodies in ways that cannot be altered by surgical or pharmaceutical procedures.

No individual athlete has been targeted in the creation of the regulations.

We need to create competition categories within our sport that ensures that success is determined by talent, dedication and hard work, rather than by other factors that are not considered fair or meaningful, such as the enormous physical advantages that an adult has over a child, or a male athlete has over a female athlete.

Balanced article for the BBC I think, which perhaps shows a fault line between the woke fantasists and realists who work with actual sports people.

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/48114137

littlbrowndog · 01/05/2019 09:08

We are all transphobe s now girl. Just for existing

I see loads of girls going off to plat football. It’s girls football not anybodies football

Jeez am so fucking pissed by this and the way the bbc reported this

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 09:04

I've already (last few days) read comments on twitter saying that men are only speaking up now because they are transphobes who hate transwomen and they were never interested enough in women's sports before.

So already they are lining up their 'defence' against any man who does speak up.

littlbrowndog · 01/05/2019 09:02

Yeah Louise on bbc just said is women’s sport even relevant

littlbrowndog · 01/05/2019 09:00

Athletics auidiences dropping cos people think that drugging is prevelant

Now this would make it into a joke

allmywhat · 01/05/2019 09:00

holy shit they really said that?

This is getting so scary. I thought people generally understand why women's sport exists. It was also obvious that the endpoint of transactivism would destroy women's sport. BUT I THOUGHT THEY WEREN'T SAYING IT OUT LOUD YET.

Are they thinking they can get the public to support this? I hope they're wrong.

And if they can get public support for that, what other women's rights are they going to feel emboldened to openly destroy?

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 09:00

Have I just become an anybody.

Sadly littl I think you'd become a no-body because of your genetics you'd probably not place high enough.

TowelNumber42 · 01/05/2019 08:58

"Women XX" will have to become a Paralympic category.

GirlDownUnder · 01/05/2019 08:58

BBC and the Guardian have had a big push recently on promoting women's sport

How do they define woman??!

littlbrowndog · 01/05/2019 08:58

If there is no women’s sport where will I play my sport.

Where will girls train for if there is no women’s sport

It’s like just erasing women isn’t it ?

Have I just become an anybody.

Imagine athletics meetings

The men’s 100 metres. And then the commentator announces the anybody 100 metres