Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

AMA Trans thread got me thinking about the terms cis/trans...

67 replies

StopThePlanet · 22/04/2019 17:34

You'd think 'cis' and 'trans' would both be offensive to trans individuals that use Latin origins as base definitions.

For reference, here are the definitions: Latin: cis = "this side of" and tra = "the other side of/across from". This would denote that 'cis' people are on one side and trans people are fully transitioned and on the other side of their biological sex (which is incorrect as changing gender does not equal changing sex and most trans people do not fully transition - as per stats released by UK, US, et al).

Do trans individuals want to be looked at and see themselves as being on the other side of/across from 99%+ of the Earth's population?

I doubt it.

The more logical, more kind, and rational perspective would be:

(a) Cis is redundant - an unnecessary prefix as it defines a default i.e. humans are sexually dimorphic thus... men are male and women are female based on biological sex regardless of gender presentation.

(b) Trans is a great prefix as it denotes a spectrum of variants on default i.e. humans are sexually dimorphic but some feel that their biological sex is mismatched with their sense/feel of their desired/perceived sex thus transmen are females that sense/feel like what they believe it is to be male and transwomen are males that sense/feel like what they believe it is to be female. Trans people are forever trans (unless they desist) even after full transition as it is scientifically impossible to convert to the sex opposite of birth.

How can I refine/condense these statements to be more mentally accessible to those that are towing the TWAW/TMAM narrative? Looking to have thoughtful and respectful conversations with the aforementioned - please help!!!

OP posts:
StopThePlanet · 22/04/2019 22:02

Zutt Wink

OP posts:
LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 22/04/2019 21:37

‘Woman’ suits me fine
‘A fucking real woman’ may also work if in comparison to a person who doesn’t have the biology yet insisted that they are ‘woman’.

LarryGreysonsDoor · 22/04/2019 21:34

Saying they have periods does not mean they do. And again, if a medical practitioner does not know that they should lose their license to practice.

Which is why it worries me that some doctor will say that transwomen are women. They simply cannot really believe it but they will swear blind they do.

ErrolTheDragon · 22/04/2019 21:20

As a chemist I do use cis and trans. They mean two different configurations of constituents on a double bond - exactly the same bits but differently and (usually) non-interconvertible. They are different chemical species which have different properties.

WeepingWillowWeepingWino · 22/04/2019 21:07

OP - I only knew of cis as opposed to trans because of studying Latin and Classics and coming across cisalpine Gaul and transalpine Gaul. Never knew about the scientific use of it.

ReSistingPink · 22/04/2019 20:55

@StopThePlanet
thanks. I will. I have tried to say the same thing, only not as precisely as you have put it.

I have said that the Latin and scientific use of 'trans' is nothing at all to do with 'transition'.
Therefore trying to use 'cis' as some opposite form of trans is just goblidigook.

I prefer your breakdown. ✊🏻💗

ZuttZeVootEeeVro · 22/04/2019 20:49

Precision in language is important. I am uneasy with "cis" but haven't been able to put my finger on why

For me, it's about the word woman.

Transwoman means male woman,
Cis woman means female woman

Therefore what does woman mean?

ZuttZeVootEeeVro · 22/04/2019 20:41

I did laugh when reading it after posting though
Grin

StopThePlanet · 22/04/2019 20:37

Aw, nobody picked at my cisalpine post I thought my realization on 'cis' was a little profound if not at least a little amusing - that was total stream of thought - working it out as I typed no-edit posting (I never do that).

I did laugh when reading it after posting though.

OP posts:
AlwaysComingHome · 22/04/2019 20:32

The only reason your gender would be worth noting is so that the doctor can refer to you as Mr, Miss or Mrs to your face.

Out of earshot they probably call you ‘the prolapse in bed 3.’

StopThePlanet · 22/04/2019 20:20

For the record, reading some of your posts it appears that some of you are not aware that I am not a 'cis' prefix supporter.

If you can't tell that I am a 'cis' prohibitionist by my original post I wonder if I have found the right words to communicate these thoughts? As we know, in order to make progress we have to converse with those with differing perspectives and we can't gain ground if we can't define words within the context of a conversation, right? We are inevitably going to encounter those that believe 'cis' as a prefix is not offensive. I'm looking to apply definitions that work within the global context of critical thought in an attempt to divorce sex from gender without going deep GC explanation. GC theory can be complicated for some to understand especially with blinders on (regardless of politics and/or religion or gender perspective).

ReSistingPink

Hey thanks, have at it! If you receive logical/rational replies that warrant a response I would really appreciate you letting me know the feedback and your response(s) thereto. I have some projects going and I need to be very clear but very thoughtful and respectful of all of my potential audiences in order to foster actual discourse. I'm also fully aware that no matter what I write it can be twisted to fit anyone's narrative. I tend to be snarky when I find something to be illogical and I am trying to reduce this proclivity so my words can have real impact. Thanks in advance!

OP posts:
FeministCat · 22/04/2019 20:19

Saying they have periods does not mean they do. And again, if a medical practitioner does not know that they should lose their license to practice.

And that makes the point doesn’t it? Why do you think a transwomen who says they have periods wants a word to define themselves as something different than women?

LarryGreysonsDoor · 22/04/2019 20:11

Well there are some transwomen who say they have periods.........

FeministCat · 22/04/2019 19:59

If trans people won't tell medical professionals what their biological sexual is then they're pretty dim. I tell them my medical history because it's relevant.

This. Do you think if a transman went into the ER hemorrhaging from their uterus they would just neglect to mention at admissions that they are biologically a woman? I am guessing not, and if they did they are being ridiculous.

FeministCat · 22/04/2019 19:54

LarryGreysonsDoor

If a man who identifies as a woman presents at the hospital with abdominal pains and medical practitioners can’t rule or that they don’t need a pregnancy test by very fact they are men then they should be stripped of their licenses.

The problem now is transwomen don’t want to have to show up and say “I am a transwoman”. They want to say they are women. I’ve seen them even say they are a biological female. It does not matter what women call themselves, as men will want to call themselves it as well. I don’t think women should had to modify the word woman for themselves at all.

The word to differentiate from ‘woman’ is ‘man’.

OrchidInTheSun · 22/04/2019 19:48

If trans people won't tell medical professionals what their biological sexual is then they're pretty dim. I tell them my medical history because it's relevant.

UvvenGluv · 22/04/2019 19:43

Cis: same
Trans: opposite

Ciswoman = same thing as a woman = woman (cis is redundant)
Transwoman = opposite thing to a woman (man)

TheLazyDuchess · 22/04/2019 19:42

"For example, a woman presents at the hospital with abdominal pains, they need to be able to explain why it’s not worth checking if they are pregnant."

All they'd need to say is, "actually I'm biologically male?" As in "I'm biologically related to so and so but we don't awknowledge it".

Ereshkigal · 22/04/2019 19:39

‘Cis’ is an ideologically loaded term associated with shame. If you said ‘I’m cis and I’m proud of it’ they’d lose their shit.

This.

StopThePlanet · 22/04/2019 19:38

LarryGreysonsDoor

I've heard of very few words with prefix 'cis' used in the way 'cis' is used in the trans community. I can think of one right now - cisalpine (south/Roman side of the Alps) but I think it could refer to the north side of the Alps as well since 'cis' doesn't mean 'north or south of' as determining position of 'this side' or 'other side' lies with the beholder.

OP posts:
AlwaysComingHome · 22/04/2019 19:36

There needs to be a word to differentiate from women

There is. It’s three letters long and begins with ‘m’.

AlwaysComingHome · 22/04/2019 19:33

People don’t present as the other sex; they present as the other gender. They’ve even conceded this point by rebranding themselves transgender instead of transsexual.

I don’t feel the need to refer to myself two-legs when I’m talking to somebody with none. In fact, that would be bloody rude.

And you can bet that if I kept reminding somebody who is trans that I’m ‘cis’ - and didn’t do it in a grovelingly apologetic manner - they’d flip out over it.

‘Cis’ is an ideologically loaded term associated with shame. If you said ‘I’m cis and I’m proud of it’ they’d lose their shit.

LarryGreysonsDoor · 22/04/2019 19:30

Exactly. So that person needs to be able to say ‘I can’t be pregnant, I am a transwoman’. There needs to be a word to differentiate from women.

OrchidInTheSun · 22/04/2019 19:28

Larry - if a woman presents at hospital with abdominal pains, they need t rule out pregnancy. If they are a transwoman they are a man so can't get pregnant

LarryGreysonsDoor · 22/04/2019 19:20

But, Always, there does need to be a term for people who were born as one sex but present as the other.
For example, a woman presents at the hospital with abdominal pains, they need to be able to explain why it’s not worth checking if they are pregnant.

Some people are trans and we need to be able to say that, however I don’t think that I need to be called cis. Just ‘a woman’ will do.
By labelling like this we create barriers.