Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Do i put the fathers name on my babys birth certificate?

133 replies

emmajayne89 · 13/04/2019 17:16

My partner and I split up towards the end of my first trimester after i discovered he had been having an inappropriate/flirtatious relationship with a female 'friend' of his and he had lied about it throughout our entire relationship. After coming to terms with this he agreed with therapy but he was continuuing to lie to me about things (silly things like his age and what hes doing- pathological lying), so i had to call an end to the relationship.

he wants to be involved in our babys life as much as he can be, so i've said he needs to demonstrate hes taking therapy seriously and hes improving and being truthful to himself and his family and friends and i will incorporate him into the babys life as well as trial coparenting.

The issue is whether i add him to the birth certificate or not. I know I wont restrict his time with our child unless i believe its well justified (and backed up by several impartial views before any changes are made). He is immature in a lot of ways and to an exaggerated level than is acceptable for his age and is currently being combatted in therapy.

What is the right thing to do? Add him because after all he is the father, or dont add him to protect myself from possible drama in the future? I had already advised him that if he can provide proof of payment for therapy then child support doesnt need to be considered unless he gets a promotion/able to afford both.

OP posts:
justasking111 · 13/04/2019 20:11

My friends girlfriend just said she did not know who the dad was and refused a DNA test. To be honest who wants an ex. breathing down your neck for 18 years.

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 20:08

“The OP isn't going to be able to stop him having a say in their child's medical treatments or house moves, regardless of whether or not she trusts him.”
But he will have to go to court to get it. Putting him on the birth certificate just hands it to him.

Erythronium · 13/04/2019 19:55

"if he can provide proof of payment for therapy then child support doesnt need to be considered unless he gets a promotion/able to afford both."

It's more important for a father to support his chilid than it is for him to get therapy which is very unlikely to change him anyway. Don't let him get away with not paying for his baby.

PCohle · 13/04/2019 19:54

Not putting him on the birth certificate won't prevent him having any of those rights though. Just make it harder and more expensive for him to gain PR.

The OP isn't going to be able to stop him having a say in their child's medical treatments or house moves, regardless of whether or not she trusts him.

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 19:52

Or a house move?

This is important stuff. In the olden days when mine were little, if you were unmarried you had to go to a solicitor for the father to get parental responsibility. Now women are handing it to crap men without a second thought.

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 19:50

Yep. And on a more trivial note- do you want him being able to veto a holiday?

Natsku · 13/04/2019 19:48

The medical stuff is really important - if you can't trust him you don't want him having a say in medical treatment. My DD's dad was able to stop her getting psychiatric treatment after trauma which had a long term impact, only did it to be a dick.

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 19:37

If you put the father in the birth certificate, this is what it means “ [He] will also have the right to make decisions about the child’s care and upbringing. Important decisions in a child’s life must be agreed with anyone else who has parental responsibility.

If [he has]parental responsibility for a child then [he] will have a say in:

The name of your child
How your child is educated
Their religious upbringing, if any
Medical treatment
Where and with whom they live
Whether and when they may travel abroad (permanently or temporarily)

RepealTheGRA · 13/04/2019 19:37

Don’t do it.

Listen to Bertrand and Ribbons

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 19:30

You can tell your child who it’s father is, you know! And it doesn’t say father unknown- it just leaves it blank. And why would anyone care?

Jaffacakebeast · 13/04/2019 19:29

Wasn’t there a thread the other day, shitty dad cancelling kid hospital app, if you think he’s going to be no good y would you risk it? They can be dicks about all sorts, not just passports.

Bluntness100 · 13/04/2019 19:29

It's not about you or him, it's about your child and what an awful thing, to deny your child their fathers name on the birth certicate and write father unknown instead.

How you both co parent is a different story, but think of your child growing up with father unknown when you did know.

justasking111 · 13/04/2019 19:27

A friend of mine, his ex partner would not put him on the certificate or acknowledge he was the father because it would affect her benefits. It was easier to claim she said rather than rely on him for money. He was very upset by this.

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 19:23

“A birth certificate is as factual as stating the sex of the child.”

No it isn’t. It is giving the father parental responsibility. That is a big deal ans not to be done without careful consideration.

Natsku · 13/04/2019 19:22

Don't do it. Let him prove he wants to be involved and actually be a dad and then he can apply to have his name added to it. If you add him now and he decides to fuck off then you'll have problems if you want to travel abroad or things like that. If you didn't think there was a chance of this you wouldn't be questioning it so trust your instincts.

DancingRaven · 13/04/2019 19:20

No, I wouldn't.

zippey · 13/04/2019 19:20

A birth certificate is as factual as stating the sex of the child. The biological fathers name should be put on as should the biological mothers. Not doing for selfish reasons is just... selfish. Be the bigger person.

BertrandRussell · 13/04/2019 19:15

“I'm not sure how it works in the UK -- assuming that's where you're based. Does being on the BC automatically mean you have joint custody?”

No. But it does mean he has parental responsibility.

Branleuse · 13/04/2019 19:15

if you put his name on there its a disaster waiting to happen

PanamaPattie · 13/04/2019 19:13

Don't put him on. Use your surname. He's already shown to be a waster and a liar. He framing up to be a typical dead-beat dad. Why would you want him in your lives?

Bluestitch · 13/04/2019 19:04

What gives you the higher hand to decide should his name be there or not ?

The law does.

Lamaha · 13/04/2019 19:04

correction: Austrian law is terrible for the dad if they are not married and he wants to be responsibly involved.

1Rose19 · 13/04/2019 19:02

You could not get pregnant without that man.
What gives you the higher hand to decide should his name be there or not ? Your child might grow up more closer to the father than you.
You both have equal rights when it comes to being parent you being a mother and him being a father. You cannot be a father and he cannot be a mother.
His name should be there he is the dad off!

Ohfuhfoxsake · 13/04/2019 19:01

I didn’t. Added him later.

The DC also have my name.

Lamaha · 13/04/2019 18:59

I'm not sure how it works in the UK -- assuming that's where you're based. Does being on the BC automatically mean you have joint custody?

My son has a daughter and was never married to the mum; they split up when the baby was about 3. He is on the birth certificate but the mother refused to give him joint custody, she is Austrian and that is the law there; it's not automatic.

Son is a fantastic father and would have married her but she didn't want to, has hippie-ish notions of freedom. And because he doesn't have any say, she took off when the kid was 3 and took her to China for three years. Then the child was in the way of what she wanted to do so she sent her to stay with my son for a year -- in South America. She was seven and just starting school.. It went really, really well. He returned her to mum after a year and mum had custody again and went to live in Berlin but didn't like it and moved to Austria and hates it even more there, wants to move on. So now there's talk of sending the poor kid back to Dad for a while, to go to school in Ireland. We are all very keen to have her here.

This is of course irrelevant to the OP's dilemma but by now the kid has lived in five different countries, and Ireland will be the sixth (the one advantage is that she is basically trilingual now). All because there is no joint custody which of course is in the mum's interest as DS would never gave allowed her to swan off to China.

That's why my original question, birth certificate registration might not necessarily mean custody, unless that is UK law. I assume it is, judging by the replies above!

Austrian law is terrible for the dad if they are not married. He can only get joint custody if the mum applies for it; but he has to be on the bc (by law) and pay maintenance.

Both in Austria and Germany they also oversee dad's maintenance payments, and if he can't, or doesn't, pay, he accumulates a debt from social services! Which is a good thing as I think it makes men a little more conscious of their responsibility, both in birth control as in parental duty and involvement.

Sorry for the long rant derail. It's the wine! Grin

Swipe left for the next trending thread