The article says "A woman may terminate her pregnancy in cases of a documented medical emergency, or if she is a victim of rape or incest"
It doesn't even make any sense from the point of view of those who are pushing this legislation through. They say they value life, and that's why they want to ban abortions. But not if that life was conceived in a way they deem unacceptable.
Will women with ectopic pregnancies have to wait until it has reached a medical emergency before they can be treated? Or a partial molar pregnancy where there is a heartbeat?
Why do the public in these states vote in these people? Is it really the majority view of the electorate on those states?