Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Another Mermaid statement: about Good Morning Britain and Caroline Farrow

262 replies

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 24/03/2019 21:03

Apparently Farrow will be on GMB tomorrow.

There are some interesting bits in this statement:

Jackie is, of course, deeply upset by the reference to her as being mutilated, castrated and sterilised.

Jackie is also distressed at the assertion that this was something that was somehow done ‘to her’. The only people deliberately doing anything 'to her' are the online trolls using the most abusive language about her. She would like the online abuse to stop.

At 16, she undertook extensive psychological assessment from independent experts before she was cleared for, and undertook, gender reassignment surgery. Her competency and full knowledge of all the implications was clear.

At 25 she still considers that surgery, for her, was lifesaving, and is distressed at the implication that she was not capable and mature enough to make this decision.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
JessicaWakefieldSVH · 24/03/2019 21:58

and is distressed at the implication that she was not capable and mature enough to make this decision

It’s not an implication, it’s fact. It’s why here in this country it is illegal. Jackies distress is entirely on Susie and the doctors who allowed this type of treatment for a child.

It’s a really pathetic attempt at emotional manipulation to use her child to try and get others to shut up about safeguarding children and Susie’s role as head of a children’s charity. It’s not going to work Susie, stop hiding behind your child. Nobody is attacking or abusing your child by exposing the illegal things you did, and the dangerous messages you and your charity are promoting.

Datun · 24/03/2019 21:50

Whatever she says tomorrow, it will be scrutinised afterwards.

The woman is just digging herself in ever deeper.

and is distressed at the implication that she was not capable and mature enough to make this decision.

Jackie's distress, whilst unfortunate, is irrelevant. According to the latest research she would have made that decision with a possible drop of 8 IQ points. Which she may not have recovered.

Can the discussion about trans children please now become less toxic and abusive"

It's about the parents, making the wrong decisions for the children.

And it might be less toxic and abusive if you didn't try and keep getting everyone arrested for disagreeing with you.

Strewth. This woman needs to stop.

Who keeps going at this rate of knots when every step they take is making them look worse ?!

EweSurname · 24/03/2019 21:49

I've archived the thread but I think each individual tweet might need to be archived? Freely admitting that I'm utterly baffled by archiving Grin

web.archive.org/web/20190324214646/https:/twitter.com/mrkhtake2/status/1075052199921807360

EweSurname · 24/03/2019 21:47

This whole thread needs archiving but I don't have the ability to do it at the moment - if anyone fancies having a go, please do!

twitter.com/mrkhtake2/status/1075052199921807360

nettie434 · 24/03/2019 21:47

I know a few women who wanted to be sterilised after having children. All were told it was not an option until they were over 30.

Agree with RedShoeBlueShoe. Plus, I have also read interviews with women who felt very sure they did not want children and wanted to be sterilised but faced an uphill battle to achieve this, although I don't know anyone in this position personally.

I feel so much for Jackie Green. I want her to have a happy life. If I were her, I wonder whether I would prefer to know there were few tweets about me that were only seen by very few people (who then probably forgot them) than to be constantly pushed into the limelight.

While transition at this very young age may indeed have been the best decision in the circumstances but it is an impossibility to make everyone agree. Dissent will always exist, even if it is driven underground.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 24/03/2019 21:41

The wording has been changed to read 'By' rather than "At 16"

Interesting. Current (at time of posting) version archived here just in case it changes again:

archive.li/4mdyC

I thought some of the stuff in the statement seemed to be answering specific criticisms made here, looks like it's confirmed that we are being closely watched

OP posts:
RepealTheGRA · 24/03/2019 21:40

Wheels are coming off.

Do they honestly think that drawing more attention to Caroline’s tweets helps their cause? Confused Batshit insane.

pombear · 24/03/2019 21:39

Her there are quite a few interesting 'pre-Mermaid-wash' coments from that interesting Yorkshire Post article too:

“Oh good God yes,” she says. “I’ll be quite honest, if I could have had a choice I would have liked to have had a son who was completely heterosexual (I'm not sure how that's linked to being trans as surely it's bodily identity not sexual orientation that Jack/Jackie had a problem with - how had sexual orientation crept in, other than worrying about 'girly boys' at a very young age?) Because I feared for her future. I wasn’t horrified by the prospect of her being a girl

When she was such a girly boy from such an early age I even started hoping she might grow out of it and it might turn out that I had a gay son. I think I must have been one of the few parents who was actually praying I had a gay son. But you could see from about the age of three it wasn’t just the toys she played with it was as much as the way she played with them. Ah, yes, because your sex is to do with the way you play with toys?

Jackie was displaying classic symptoms of gender dysphoria both in terms of the timeline of change and the nature of the changes. Tellingly, research has shown that males are five times more likely to be diagnosed with GD than females. Huh? "Tellingly"? Eh?

Whilst I have huge empathy for Jack/Jackie for feeling out of sorts with their body, I also have huge empathy for Jackie for having a mother so confused in what was 'right' that Jackie got fast-tracked onto 'fixing' the problem Jackie's mother had decided Jackie had.

ClosdesMouches · 24/03/2019 21:37

^"by 16"

ClosdesMouches · 24/03/2019 21:36

The wording has been changed to read 'By' rather than "At 16"

zanahoria · 24/03/2019 21:35

Susie Green looked all around the world for a doctor who would do this operation on a 16 year old child, stands to reason she used the same approach to find an independent expert.

BixBeiderbecke · 24/03/2019 21:30

Didn’t someone say Jackie is quietly getting on with their life somewhere abroad? I feel like J is now being wheeled out to defend Susie. If so, anotherpretty horrible thing to do to your child.

R0wantrees · 24/03/2019 21:29

But presumably not when Jackie was 16 as SG states

I think (?) Ive read an interview in which Susie Green says it was Dr Spack who referred to the Thai surgeon.

will see if I can remember where.
please dont quote me!

EmpressLesbianInChair · 24/03/2019 21:29

Screenshots of the tweets.

Another Mermaid statement:  about Good Morning Britain and Caroline Farrow
Another Mermaid statement:  about Good Morning Britain and Caroline Farrow
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 24/03/2019 21:25

www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/health/from-jack-to-jackie-why-i-had-sex-change-at-16-1-4018711

Archived here just in case:
archive.li/2LDlp

OP posts:
R0wantrees · 24/03/2019 21:24

Also from article above:

"From then on her life became more and more difficult until eventually her parents made the decision to pay for Jackie, as she was known by that time, to have £28,000 of treatment and complete gender reassignment surgery. She was the youngest patient in the world to go through the procedure. "

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 24/03/2019 21:23

This would likely be with Dr Norman Spack (USA) who prescribed the 'puberty blockers' & cross sex hormones.

But presumably not when Jackie was 16 as SG states.

OP posts:
HerFemaleness · 24/03/2019 21:22

At 16, she undertook extensive psychological assessment from independent experts before she was cleared for, and undertook, gender reassignment surgery.

www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/health/from-jack-to-jackie-why-i-had-sex-change-at-16-1-4018711

From the article

Wheeling her into the operating theatre on her 16th birthday the nurses sang ‘Happy Birthday’ to her. “And it was my birthday,” says Jackie. “I felt like I was being born all over again.”

Hmm
R0wantrees · 24/03/2019 21:22

The point is that Susie Green is CEO of Mermaids Charity and has used her family's experience (particularly that of her child, Jackie) to create policy & influence many children, parents and carers in the UK.

Susie Green references the personal experiences of her child whenever she has a public platform (which is frequently) and promotes the medical interventions that her child had as 'best practice'. This is contrary to UK NICE guidance NHS ethics and protocols

Redshoeblueshoe · 24/03/2019 21:20

I know a few women who wanted to be sterilised after having children. All were told it was not an option until they were over 30

Needmoresleep · 24/03/2019 21:20

"Can the discussion about trans children please now become less toxic and abusive"

Flipping heck...have they forgotten mimmymum already?

Popchyk · 24/03/2019 21:17

Yep, weird that Susie Green points to her own child having extensive counselling but that Green is advocating for the removal of the requirement for having any counselling whatsoever before surgery. For children.

Why is that exactly, Susie?

Care to explain?

R0wantrees · 24/03/2019 21:17

At 16, she undertook extensive psychological assessment from independent experts before she was cleared for, and undertook, gender reassignment surgery. Her competency and full knowledge of all the implications was clear.

This would likely be with Dr Norman Spack (USA) who prescribed the 'puberty blockers' & cross sex hormones.

Daily Mail interview with Susie Green
(extract)
Then, after being treated in the U.S. with hormone blockers to delay the onset of male puberty when she was 12 — the treatment was not then available for children her age in the UK — Jackie underwent gender reassignment surgery in Thailand on her 16th birthday.

a person standing on a snow covered slope: Susie, who was working as an IT manager and was by then a divorced mum of four, re-mortgaged their home in Leeds to raise the £13,500 to pay for Jackie’s lower body surgery© Provided by Associated Newspapers Limited Susie, who was working as an IT manager and was by then a divorced mum of four, re-mortgaged their home in Leeds to raise the £13,500 to pay for Jackie’s lower body surgery
‘Dr Suporn Watanyusakul, the surgeon, was regarded as the best in the world in his field,’ says Susie. And Jackie made history as the youngest person in the world ever to undergo the procedure.

Susie, who was working as an IT manager and was by then a divorced mum of four, re-mortgaged their home in Leeds to raise the £13,500 to pay for Jackie’s lower body surgery.

Over the preceding four years she had also spent around £20,000 on hormone treatment, blood tests, psychological assessments, therapy and travel to the U.S., where paediatric endocrinologist Dr Norman Spack treated Jackie at his clinic for transgender children." (continues)
www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/pregnancy-parenting/my-child-wouldn%E2%80%99t-be-here-today-if-she-hadn%E2%80%99t-gone-from-jack-to-jackie-defiant-mum-whose-harrowing-story-inspired-anna-friels-transgender-drama-butterfly-praises-show-which-critics-say-is-just-crude-propaganda/ar-BBOp5c5

see also
This documentary about Jackie Green's quest to win a beauty pageant (aged 18) is really worth watching:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkWv9cbda4c

In the documentary above it is important to be aware of the role that Dr Spack played in influencing and impacting both Susie & Jackie Green.

He has talked about how he deliberately prescribed cross sex hormone so that Jackie would not reach her natural height.

He is seen talking with Jackie Green and thanking her as she has helped his work. Susie Green also talks about how Dr Spack absolutely affirmed her child's belief at a very difficult time for the family & how important this relationship was.

His influence on the family as well as Mermaids charity is considerable and seems yet to gain much attention

From Daily Mail 2016:
'The woman who used to be a boy is now at the heart of a controversy over children as young as nine given drugs to change sex'
(extract)
"Scientific research on the impact of the hormone treatments on a young body is sparse. Some parents nevertheless ignore the NHS age rules and buy the hormones online or take their child to private clinics in the UK, the U.S., Holland or Germany.

Helen Webberley, a GP in Wales, has set up a gender clinic where a ‘handful’ of children have been put on cross-sex hormones, including a 12-year-old boy who was born a girl. According to Dr Webberley, this child had been on ‘blockers’ since the age of nine and did not want to wait until 16 to bring on his male puberty.

"The evangelist-in-chief for early medical intervention is 73-year-old Dr Norman Spack, a paediatric endocrinologist at the Boston Children’s Hospital in America. He is also the guiding light of Mermaids and a friend of both Susie Green and Dr Webberley.

He wants children who identify as transgender to routinely be given hormone-blocking drugs around the onset of puberty, and then move to high doses of hormones to change their sex, after which they can consider surgery.

The Spack philosophy is that age limits are arbitrary and often cruel. ‘Why wait?’ is his mantra. He says he has put ‘about 200 children’ onto hormone blockers, and claims 100 per cent have gone on to take cross-sex hormones because ‘no one changes their mind’

But other medics, such as Dr James Barrett, a consultant psychiatrist at London’s Charing Cross gender identity clinic, warns of the dangers of starting irreversible treatment too early."

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3973036/Jackie-Green-heart-controversy-children-young-nine-given-drugs-change-sex.html

There is a clip somewhere (not sure if it was the TedTalk?)of Susie Green in conversation with Dr Spack where he happily talks of deliberately restricting Jackie Green's height because she would have been 'too tall' for a woman.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 24/03/2019 21:16

SG seems to be really flailing, is it too much to hope that this is the start of the unravelling?

OP posts: