acknowledge that this political movement is entirely in denial about its blindingly obvious infiltration by abusers?
You could be generous and take the line that if they acknowledge seeing that particular bit then they would have to acknowledge a whole lot more which would be utterly unacceptable to those driving this. However lets face it, we're already in a place where there are special exemptions being made for safeguarding that value the enablement of males to get what they want at the expense of the basic rights, inclusion and safety of women and children despite multiple incidents where women and children have suffered, and we're merely into how many women and children are acceptable collateral damage. Which is mind boggling and very difficult to understand how authorities can truly be this thick and this unjust.
Or you could take the line that this is not a bug, this is a feature, and many of the most important drivers and funders of this movement designed this feature with their own needs in mind, and have sufficient money and power to force aside law, basic justice, human rights of people without penises/children etc.
Honestly not sure which is scarier.
Either way its interesting to note just how many public figures with the ear of government and media in the UK TRA movement alone have a history of violent or sex related 'incidents'.