Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

MNHQ closing this board *MNHQ edited to say OH NO WE AREN'T!*

41 replies

Binglebong · 12/03/2019 22:28

A few months ago we saw loads of posts about how this board could close and there was an attack on advertisers to boycott mumsnet. It occurs to me that I've not seen that in a while. Any idea why?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Lemoncakestrudel · 13/03/2019 20:07

I have to say I had no idea what FWR was and after ages of watching twaddle on AIBU, finally got the courage to come and have a look... and stayed. I talk rubbish a lot but it is nice not to be shouted down (usually).

HumberElla · 13/03/2019 18:54

Nice edit MNHQ! I’m liking your style.

And thank you.

Binglebong · 13/03/2019 18:48

The question mark is your friend, my friend
The title wasn't a question - it was a title. The question was inside. And had a question mark. Anyway, I've been kicking around here long enough that plenty can say if I do clickbate hint: I don't.

Mnhq thank you for the name change as requested. I have to say you outdid yourselves with it. 《Bows Gin》 Any chance you'd like to comment on this?

OP posts:
VickyEadie · 13/03/2019 17:03

This place has saved my sanity.

NotTerfNorCis · 13/03/2019 16:59

Great title change MN! Wine

User07734 · 13/03/2019 16:51

BearGinCakeGrin

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 13/03/2019 15:57

I like the title change

MNHQ Gin

EcclesThePeacock · 13/03/2019 15:53

I hope that if this subject comes up again in future we can confidently say 'it's behind you'.

ApplesinmyPocket · 13/03/2019 15:28

I love that title edit. How to MNHQ with flair.

Flowers MNHQ

Vixxxy · 13/03/2019 14:57

The edit Grin

Lamaha · 13/03/2019 14:17

Cake Wine Flowers MNHQ

EcclesThePeacock · 13/03/2019 14:16

That's a good emphatic title change! SmileThanks

Knicknackpaddyflak · 13/03/2019 14:12

Just saw the title change! Grin

Flowers and Gin and huge thanks @MNHQ

NellieEllie · 13/03/2019 13:33

I just thank goodness that MN is here. Like many, I initially wondered why there was so much “anti trans” stuff on this thread - which I rarely visited. Once I actually appreciated what was going on, I am just so grateful that there is a sane haven to go to.

Vixxxy · 13/03/2019 12:39

Can't see this happening at all, regardless of how many TRAs want it. Targeting advertisers seemed to get them nowhere. MN has been instrumental in bringing this nonsense out into sunlight. I do wonder how far any of this would have gone if MN did decide to go the way of near all other forums and refuse to let us talk. The guidelines are annoying at times, but necessary I think.

I am sure Datun with her stats, said FWR was the second most popular board these days, after AIBU.

Lamaha · 13/03/2019 12:04

When I first questioning the gender agenda on another forum a poster there advised me to come here. I've been here ever since, abandoning that other forum which seemed too woke. I suspect I'm typical for many ordinary women who weren't in any way radical feminists before, but since discovering how by stealth our rights are being seriously undermined have become not just angry but raging!
This is the place. And there's nothing "they" can do about us because we're here now and we know.
No more stealth; the toothpaste is out of the tube!

ahagwearsapointybonnet · 13/03/2019 10:58

On top of the above reasons, I'd add that a) it would look terrible (I'm sure at this stage it would hit the press significantly, and would draw even more attention to the GC arguments, so I don't think anyone but the most deluded activists would really want that now), b) the points made here are increasingly - and more visibly - being proved right, for example with the reporting on Karen White, Martina, the Tavistock report etc, and c) although they don't/can't say much, and despite the tightening of the guidelines (which I do think was done in an attempt to avoid worse, even if it sometimes seemed excessive), I would put money on at least some of MNHQ sharing our concerns and wanting to keep the discussion open, even if it means taking a lot of flak Flowers

hipsterfun · 13/03/2019 10:52

Was intended as a genuine question.

The question mark is your friend, my friend.

EcclesThePeacock · 13/03/2019 10:48

Apart from the stats, there was a thread in which MNHQ asked people to say why they used MN, what they read .... I'm not sure they were expecting any particular response but it was overwhelmingly FWR, many posts from lurkers who aren't otherwise visible. Some people coming here specifically because they'd picked up that MN is a place where women can still discuss women's rights, a lot 'came for parenting, stayed for FWR'.

Hellmistress · 13/03/2019 10:43

"I thought some time back a mner shared stats showing that this was one of the highest traffic areas on the site"

I don't doubt it but suspect a lot of the traffic is twanz people and their sympathisers keeping a watchful eye on us all.

Under his eye

BettyDuMonde · 13/03/2019 10:10

We need women’s rights from birth to death, regardless of whether we become mothers, are childless, or choosing to live childfree.

The feminist board here attracts posters from all over the English speaking world and attracts traffic 24 hours a day.

I’m sure its contribution to business model makes it well worth the extra modding costs (demanded by the silent, volunteer Mumsnet Watchers - not the actual community users, of course. Under Zes Eye).

WokerThanWoke · 13/03/2019 09:44

Oh god can you imagine the uproar if we started posting in chat all the time. The number of tedious “how do I hide threads?” posts would go through the roof.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 13/03/2019 06:20

Mumsnet closes it's feminism board?

not a good look. They'd have banned regular posters instead. Which in fact MNHQ did. Check out the missing in action thread.

if MNHQ close the board we'd all just go and make a nuisance of ourselves elsewhere on the site with our feminist views. At least this way we're where everyone can see us. I imagine that's part of the reasoning.

FemalePersonator · 13/03/2019 05:42

Nah. MN is too big and we're all too ugly.

It is posts like this that make me love MN.

Lamaha · 13/03/2019 03:09
Grin being fairly new to this forum, I missed the Birdseye kerfuffle and so I looked it up (being awake at 3 am and unable to sleep. Good entertainment and a chuckle or two so here's a thread for other newcomers: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3363404-TRAs-going-after-MN-sponsors-BirdsEye?pg=1