Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

4thWaveNow has some incredibly disturbing stuff from Facebook

139 replies

GabrielleNelson · 12/03/2019 22:27

twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1104427039082405888

This one is a tweet with screenshots of 'packers', i.e. plastic penises, for girls under 5 who identify as boys to wear in their pants. (Yes, you read that right. I'd say a trans 3yo is like a vegan cat. We all know who's made that call.)

That led a concerned parent to send them a lot of screenshots from a Facebook group for affirming parents of trans children. First batch are about packers, starting here. twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1104778089974980609

Second batch are about underwear for biological boys designed to minimise bulges in the genital area. (So the opposite of the above.) twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1105542499483955200

Third batch are about binders being worn by biological girls and causing serious respiratory issues. twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1105585448657801217

The whole thing is just sickening. Why isn't anyone sane in authority trying to re-assert normality and put the health and wellbeing of these confused children and teenagers first?

God forbid the UK ever goes the same way.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
SchadenfreudePersonified · 28/03/2019 10:03

Sometimes I just can't believe what I'm reading.

If these parents were forcing their children to eat salt or whatever to make them ill for attention, the law would come down like a ton of bricks - but it seems that you can bamboozle, manipulate and pressure your child into taking dangerous drugs so that you can make him/her in the image you desire, and that's okay.

OldCrone · 22/03/2019 21:45

Johanna Olson Kennedy is joining Helen Webberley and others for a live Q&A on 31st March if anyone feels like asking her some hard questions.

gendergp.co.uk/liveonlineevent/

SirVixofVixHall · 22/03/2019 21:29

That makes really grim reading. This has an influence on girls in Europe too, we know two confused, ASD girls, one in my dd’s class, and another in mainland Europe. Both mid teens, both suddenly saying they are boys. Dd’s classmate has talked to her about getting a binder. It is just heartbreaking. I suppose at least in Britain they are unlikely to get hormonal treatment yet.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 22/03/2019 18:41

oh my, that thread. I cannot even get my head around what the hell is happening? how can this be real?! How the fuck can this happen to children?

GabrielleNelson · 22/03/2019 18:29

I'm sorry, LangCleg. I just can't get my head round any of this, but I'm grateful for the advance warning of what some would like to see happening over here. For the moment this couldn't happen here, not on the NHS anyway, but we know there will be parents taking their children abroad, and kids buying drugs on the internet, and private doctors with lax ethical standards.

From reading that thread I have questions about what's happening in the US.

  1. Qualified doctors, presumably subject to some sort of professional standards and ethical requirements, are prescribing cross-hormones to very young girls (it's pretty clear this thread is about confused teenage girls who mostly aren't necessarily IDing as trans but as nonbinary or transmasculine, whatever that means). How are they not being censured? There's no research evidence confirming this is safe, is there?
  1. From the standard of the English in those screenshots, the parents are educated people. I get that they are probably desperately worried about their children but why swallow this unscientific, unevidenced stuff wholesale? Lots of parents agonise over getting their children vaccinated or giving them Calpol but here we have a group taking them across the country to get a competely untested drug regime that will make permanent changes to their teenagers' bodies.
  1. The manufacturers of the drugs, the people that run the gender clinics, the health insurers, the people aware of this from schools, colleges, youth groups and whatever the US equivalent of social services is - they're complicit. They're not raising concerns. Why not?
  1. The professional bodies regulating medicine and psychology in the US appear to have no stance on any of this either. Why not?
OP posts:
LangCleg · 22/03/2019 18:16

That most recent thread is going to stop me sleeping tonight.

GabrielleNelson · 22/03/2019 17:44

OK, sorry folks, there's more. twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1109135524948779008

1. LONG THREAD: Testosterone for nonbinary 13-year-olds, in the latest batch of leaked posts from the affirmative parent group. In several threads, multiple mothers appear to claim that Dr. Olson-Kennedy is prescribing T to middle schoolers, in some cases without blockers first.

That's as far as I've got so far, but that's bad, isn't it? @Bowlofbabelfish, do you have any idea how that would affect a female body in the early stages of puberty?

OP posts:
LangCleg · 16/03/2019 15:34

Once you are emotionally invested, withdrawing from it requests a massive admission that you have allowed harm to happen. It's easier to double down.

Yes. Self protection from a deeply painful truth.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 16/03/2019 15:34

The whole trans culture seems to depend on everyone having to agree not to face facts and reality; and not to call things what they really are

The thing is though, normally when parents get really dodgy ideas that are promulgated and harming children, eg anti-vaxxers, sensible people will come along and point out that they are harming children. People like the WHO or the government, or doctors associations.

With transing children though, no-one with any power is speaking out, individuals are, but recognised organisations are not.

Why is this?

Justhadathought · 16/03/2019 15:16

And the same is true of parents of trans children. If you have facilitated a mastectomy for your child, how can you possibly change your mind and become GC. How would you be able to live with yourself. The further parents go with transitioning their children the harder it is for them to decide that actually they were wrong...

I think you're most definitely right. Especially when you gone to the trouble of taking your child to a foreign country for surgery that was not available in your own. Maintaining, and even further promoting, the illusion of the 'transition' means not having to face the quite profound reality.

The whole trans culture seems to depend on everyone having to agree not to face facts and reality; and not to call things what they really are.

Justhadathought · 16/03/2019 15:12

I think it's a big more complex than that. More about wanting their child to get the best rather than pure ambition, though that comes into it.

It doesn't get any more complex than that, for the reason it is often unconscious behaviour. That's complex enough. Some parents really are quite pushy when it comes to their children, and express their own ambitions and desires through them. Often for many women their children are the main avenue they have for acclaim or validation. Children in certain senses are their parents' creations.

I'm not sure if you saw the Michael Jackson expose, but the two mothers most definitely were living through and enjoying the access to the lifestyle that Jackson's interest in their sons permitted.

RedToothBrush · 16/03/2019 14:03

how can you possibly change your mind and become GC. How would you be able to live with yourself.

This.

Once you are emotionally invested, withdrawing from it requests a massive admission that you have allowed harm to happen. It's easier to double down.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 16/03/2019 12:56

the mothers had to much to lose from halting the whole scenario, and so they chose to over-rule their suspicions and fears

And the same is true of parents of trans children. If you have facilitated a mastectomy for your child, how can you possibly change your mind and become GC. How would you be able to live with yourself. The further parents go with transitioning their children the harder it is for them to decide that actually they were wrong...

RedToothBrush · 16/03/2019 12:54

The child is used to further the parents own ambition.

I think it's a big more complex than that. More about wanting their child to get the best rather than pure ambition, though that comes into it.

The denial that accompanies it is more dark. I think its a naivety or total lack of life experience tbh. It would explain a class divide.

Justhadathought · 16/03/2019 11:54

I think it would be quite easy for that to happen, especially if the mothers were fans of his music. There's going to be a certain amount of denial going on, that your idol can't possibly be a bad person.

The gut instincts are usually right; but in these cases the mothers had to much to lose from halting the whole scenario, and so they chose to over-rule their suspicions and fears. I've seen this before, in the case of a friend who permitted a quite frankly, creepy guy to child mind her young disabled daughter. This creep lived next door with a woman and her child ( not his). But my friend's need for some space and assistance over-ruled any suspicions or concerns she might have had.

In fact she chose to think he was just some lovely guy, who couldn't do wrong....It was clear to me that this was not the case. He made my skin crawl. Why do people choose not to see what is in front of them?

OldCrone · 16/03/2019 11:46

In those two particular instances the mothers were flattered and groomed by Jackson too. In fact, the abuse would never have been able to happen if the mothers were not on board. The mothers chose not to see what was happening, for their own emotional reasons.

I think it would be quite easy for that to happen, especially if the mothers were fans of his music. There's going to be a certain amount of denial going on, that your idol can't possibly be a bad person.

Justhadathought · 16/03/2019 11:39

Having a transgender child seems quite fashionable in the U.S - with some big name stars having trans children.

The U.s has long ben a heavily medicalised nation; with drugs and medicines advertised on TV, and with doctors being almost like purveyors of drugs for the big pharmaceuticals. I have an old friend who has long lived in the U.s. Two of her three children are on mood altering medications for supposed mental health conditions.

Read a book recently called " Crazy Like Us" about how mental health conditions are 'exported' from the U.S across the world, into countries and cultures which had never before particularly suffered from these conditions. On top of the drug pushing, there is a whole aid industry and charity sector that is used to enable and further establish the mental health condition 'of the day'.

Justhadathought · 16/03/2019 11:32

In a way this is similar to the recent Michael Jackson child abuse revelations.....In those two particular instances the mothers were flattered and groomed by Jackson too. In fact, the abuse would never have been able to happen if the mothers were not on board. The mothers chose not to see what was happening, for their own emotional reasons. In both cases they were a bit like 'Stage Mums' or 'Hockey Moms'. The child is used to further the parents own ambition.

TowelNumber42 · 16/03/2019 11:14

That's an interesting idea. You could be on to something there.

I think the desire to be a social media special person drives it too. Perfectly ordinary heterosexual people are suddenly queer and oppressed.

kesstrel · 15/03/2019 21:08

I wonder if the tightening of the gender boxes (and all the other identity-boxes) has to do with social media. Far more, and more continuous, reinforcement because of constant conforming-signalling and conformity-checking/policing from your social group, which counteracts any exposure to alternatives and outsider perspectives? Most of it subconscious?

LeesPostersAreInFrames · 15/03/2019 18:02

What really strikes me about this whole issue is that nobody is allowed to or is interested in not conforming any more. In my generation fuck that reference make me feel old you could be a bit weird, explore not conforming, and teenage angst was about would I ever have a first kiss or have sex and am I actually attracted to same sex as well as or instead of the opposite. You were straight, gay or bi (or somewhere on a continuum,) and there wasn't really any rush to work out what box you wanted to be in, no rush to adopt a label, unless you wanted to. I thought people like Boy George were a bit weird but Kurt Cobain was cool and I was a bit of a tomboy and the guys in my college wore eyeliner and nobody but nobody blinked or cared.

These 83 recognised genders and the huge explosion of "trans identifying" small children as well as teens and adults just seems to me like a rush to get in a specific box as soon as possible. Where the fuck have any boundaries gone? "Mummy look [tucks penis] I'm a girl ha ha!" " ha ha no darling you're still a boy." "Can I wear a dress today?" "Well sure you can play dress up if you really want to but you're a boy and boys wear trousers. How about your favourite dinosaur dungarees today?"

Attracted to the same sex? You are trans, and denying it means you have ishoos. Not a clear stereotypical female or male? Must be trans. Attracted to the "right" gender but not stereotypically male or female? You're gay trans. Have normal questions about what sex and gender is because you're a child and every child does? Trans and needs medicating, a plastic penis and binder. Having standard teenage angst and are rebelling as you work out who you are? Here, have a label, and may we highly recommend Trans and different pronouns.

Since when has being male or female been such a very tight mold to fit in or reject? Why has being female but preferring comfortable trousers and t-shirts been erased? Male but have some effeminate characteristics, well damn well find your box and get in it, lord knows there are enough boxes now.

It feels like being a lesbian is being erased.

It feels very tight and restrictive - Get In Your Boxes, people.

I'm not Cis, because fuck somebody else giving me a box that I didn't ask for, want or need.

I'm a Woman. A messy, embodied, sacred, womanly woman. If I wear a dress it's with trousers or leggings, because that's what feels comfortable to me. I don't do heels. Often I wear a t shirt, joggers and hoodie, and I rarely do make up, apart from when I want to. I've only ever slept with men but I wouldn't put it past me to go for a woman if it was right to me at the time. I'm probably "gender non-conforming" but I'll raise a big huge FUCK YOU to anybody who tries to put me in a box because I've got no interest in having any label other than "Woman". I don't care what you dress like, who you fuck (as long as it's consensual) and if you do or don't conform to any stereotypes. This to me is perfectly normal and healthy, but it feels very much like all choice, fluidity and right to change your mind and explore, especially as a child or teenager, is being erased. It's not okay to not fit a box any more; all the "Woke" people are doing it. Whereas not long ago all the "Woke" people rejected labels. What. The. Fuck.

BarbarianMum · 15/03/2019 10:14

It's also worth bearing in mind that most mothers of trandsgender children are not giving interviews on tv or running a YouTube channel about their child's transition; those that do are unlikely to be "typical".

ComputerSaysMo · 15/03/2019 07:07

That’s a really interesting point, Red. I recognise that behaviour in a friend of mine whose autistic child identified as trans a few years ago. She’s very much the sole “emotional manager” in her family, for a variety of reasons. Hmm.

RedToothBrush · 14/03/2019 22:57

I know what controls my mother. The power of 'mother's guilt'. The suicide narrative has always been central to her support of the trans stuff.

But it goes way beyond that and that narrative plays into her psyche a lot deeper than out of fear.

And I think her desire to over compensate and 'do the right thing' is definitely there too. She's always been 'overly nice'. I also wonder about her poor relationship with her own mum and how much that affected her.

I don't know if this is different to parents of trans children, but I sort of feel echoes of my mum in those messages.

Those mothers genuinely want to do the right thing I believe. But there's also so much projection in there and insecurity I wonder about what's the deal with their own past. A desire to be loved and needed in a way that's absent?

I don't know. I don't think any of those mothers have intent to harm. If anything it's almost a case of 'loving too much', if that makes sense.

TemporaryPermanent · 14/03/2019 21:56

Totally agree dpwm.

A.C., Paris Lees and Sarah Brown all describe abusive homophobic fathers, mothers who chose to appease the fathers/did not protect their children, and appalling multiple trauma. They all also describe internalized self blame - they were abused because they were trans. Instead of being absolutely perfect children the way they were, and being abused because they had shitty parents.

A.C. was diagnosed as having Oppositional Defiant Disorder as a child. Just reading The Body Keeps the Score, part of which describes ODD as one of the meaningless psych diagnoses used to locate reasons for distress in traumatised children within the children themselves, rather than looking at the multiple external causes of their trauma, often including sexual abuse.

Expressing being trans in a child is a cultural social and psychological response to external factors. There are no 'trans kids.

Swipe left for the next trending thread