Guardian Journalist: "What's with Britain & its creepy, aggressive transphobia?"

Another day, another random with drawn on eyebrows shouting at women on the internet.

Didn't know where to post, but has anyone seen this?

twitter.com/quollhorreur/status/1087400378704965633

Although people are posting "... but don't they know that ...?" have a look at this guy's tweets. Every time someone asks something inconvenient the response seems to be some variation on "not true", "don't care", "bigotry", or "colonialism".

There is no point trying to engage with people who are so determined to be brain-washed. In fact, whose identity comes from that.

Well, this journalist simply has this reflex you will often (not always) find in ejaculators, to side with other ejaculators. Chromosomes are thicker than fabrics, so to speak, and he instinctively understands that people like Bergdorff are fellow ejaculators*.

(Please note that my wording is absolutely consistent with the wording of womensmarch london and, just like the women's march london, aims for inclusivity.)

Another example of a man who claims to be trans in order to gain access to children: Stephonknee Wolnisch (not sure how the last name is spelt), who claims to be an eight year-old girl. And Challoner Sr, who dressed as a little girl while torturing and sexually assaulting a genuine little girl.

We can see what you are trying to do little faux wide eyed creepy journalist man

"Sexist man finds the idea that sometimes women have minds of their own scary and aggressive, considers the possibility that not every woman is eager to engage with any penis that happens to appear in her space at any given moment creepy. Sexist man is sad, needs ice cream and blankie to feel better."

"Men and women should be able to wear, like, play with, do whatever they want regardless of if society claims it's 'for men' or 'for women', whilst remaining men or women, without changing their sex. Don't conform to gender roles or stereotypes. "

*I should have said girls and boys too

Drag is not the same, as trans at all Those are men dressing up as a performance for fun, they are men, they know they're men, they don't affect us or kids in any way (except those two drag kids in America or Canada, some reports about what those two are exposed to is worrying) How can they say that tweet, tying to say drag is the same as trans is surely transphobic.

I think some think we are like conservatives who want men to stay with all the 'masculine ' stuff, and women to stay with all the 'feminine ' stuff. Men and women should be able to wear, like, play with, do whatever they want regardless of if society claims it's 'for men' or 'for women', whilst remaining men or women, without changing their sex. Don't conform to gender roles or stereotypes. Of course there are trans people who have Gender Dysphoria who have severe distress or discomfort about the sex of their body, and need to transition, which I respect.

Yes it was reported that 2 thirds of girls referred to gender clinic in UK were autistic/had autistic traits. The UK Government wanted to do/is doing an inquiry into that, and trans activists said that was transphobic.

The Government also wanted to do/are doing an inquiry into the huge rise in children wanting to transition lately, looking at social media influence, and the teaching of transgender issues in schools.
www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/09/16/minister-orders-inquiry-4000-per-cent-rise-children-wanting/
I wonder how they will conduct this inquiry, especially relating to social media. If they have a call for evidence, I'm sure there's a lot of stuff people can send in.

OMG, I just read some of the twitter comments. They just mentioned British "love of drag" as a reason why the "transphobia" is perplexing.

The drag I've seen is either misogynistic, as performed by gay men, or transphobic, as performed by straight men.

What's creepy is how invested men and TW are in proving the misogyny that has discriminated against women for 1000's of years doesn't exist.

It's all because women like pink, apparently. No, it's not that men see women solely as purveyors of sex, offspring and free household labor, and who need to be kept in their place as such, it's all because we're "girly".

Never heard of this authoritarian little twerp before but why is he going out of his way to minimise and trying to shame-silence women's concerns? I mean.. what would be a man’s motivation for doing that?

I’m confused why this male journalist can’t see that he’s just another sexist ignorant mansplainer telling women what to do and that they have to shut up if they don’t agree?

And btw, does he include trans people in his dating pool? Obviously he must do, if he says that anyone who cares about what’s in another person’s pants is so ‘creepy’?

Or (cynical me..) perhaps HE is allowed to care what’s in people’s pants and that’s his prerogative.. but if WOMEN care about this (when it affects our safety, privacy and dignity, opportunities, rights, obligations- not just who we want to shag..) then women are wrong and ‘creepy’ to protest about this and we must be silenced?

Oh yes, dear old creepy, period perving, tween leching JY

Firstly, what aggressive transphobia do they mean? Do they know about the proposed changes to the GRA which will allow anyone to change their legal recorded sex, whether they are trans or not, by removing the requirement for Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and other safeguards, and have they reflected in the many consequences of that. This is what seemed to start the row. Plus trans activists that have been violent, or threatening, if you don't adopt all their language or ideology, and if you disagree with something, especially when you have facts and they're chatting shi t. Do they mean being alarmed by the violent tweets on terfisaslur.com such as the ones about ripping out women's ovaries, the baseball bats wrapped in barbed wire, the t shirts with fake blood stating "punch terfs", the jackets and other merch stating "die cis scum". Do they mean concerns about Mermaids due to their own statements, and lack of SG 's biological/psychological expertise, and the concerns stated from that Judge in court to keep that kid out of contact from them (court found the mother was trying to trans her son, he was taken from her care, like now lives with the father and is a happy boy. Mermaids still released a statement that the kid was trans), or Mermaids lobbying to get surgery or hormones for younger kids (who may just be gender-nonconforming), as the stuff I've seen on them follows gender stereotypes such as what toys kids play with, and was it them who had that terrible G.I. Joe vs Princess Barbie gender identity thing?, or that they recommended a doctor who has now been found guilty of running an illegal sex change clinic and prescribing cross-sex hormones to children who the nhs 'refused ' to 'treat' (why did the nhs refuse? did the nhs not think the child was trans?) as young as 12, which is against the law here. Do they mean being against Stonewall's expanded trans umbrella, which states "cross-dressers", "masculine women" and "feminine men" as transgender, along with actual trans people, and which some trans people are unhappy about? Do they mean we are against transing kids who are simply gender-nonconforming and want safeguards to protect that. That we are concerned about the social contagion we see amongst kids? That we are concerned about the NHS data showing an extremely high number of kids referred to the Gender Clinic are autistic/have autistic traits? Why might that be? That we are concerned about those AGP men who are claiming to be transgender but have a sexual fetish? That we are concerned about people like JY? What else, could go on but it's late. This is not transphobia.
I feel like the UK is and has been more liberal about men and women not conforming to their gender stereotypes.
And men cross dressing, men and women 'gender bending' been happening for decades. America is more conservative with this stuff. America seems to want to make all of these people trans. In the UK they were still called men, like Boy George. Actual trans people, or transsexuals as they used to be called have also been accepted here for a long time. Gender Dysphoria diagnosis is necessary as is education on the difference between sex and gender. They claim to know it, but seem not to. Gender is a social construct, we have a patriarchal society, which forces stereotypes and norms onto each sex. That should be rejected, not conformed to. I actually saw tweets and video from Americans saying sex is a social construct. They are so mixed up. Munroe is British and she said gender critical feminists were not feminists. Feminism is gender critical and always has been, that's the point. It critiques gender/gender stereotypes forced upon us because of our sex. She's mixed up and using wrong words, i'd rather her say terfs.

Men who don't want women to be able to set their own boundaries and who don't want women and girls to have sex segregated spaces are creepy as fuck.

I noticed someone's response to the Karen white example, was 'thats only one case'. So obviously only one male sex offender isn't enough. Wanting lots of sex offenders in womens spaces is creepy as fuck too.

Sparkyduchess

He’s responded to my tweet, and is asking me for examples of how a predator has claimed to be trans to gain access to women or kids.

Our friend JY?

AspieAndProud

"Now I think about it, I've a feeling the guy who was interviewed on RT with Nic Williams (on Friday?) may have said something similar. I don't remember the word 'creepy' but there was certainly an implication that we were unhealthily obsessed with toilets. So there may be a pattern."

It’s like how objecting to genital mutilation becomes ‘an unhealthy obsession with children’s genitals’.

Or how lesbians objecting to bedding penii are vagina 'fetishists'

Yeah, you’re right. I was hopeful, should have known better.

From him, further down that Twitter thread:

"Nothing creepy about the number of men in prison "identifying as women" to gain access to women?" This... isn't a thing. Have you ever spoken,in real life, to a trans woman?

He's an idiot.

Karen white is exactly who I went to, my response is sitting in my drafts.

I guess I just wanted to give him MORE, but one is enough.

Given the amount of publicity surrounding the Karen White case and the sheer bloody obviousness of how it demonstrates exactly what we are concerned about, I’m done accepting that people who want to dismantle safety procedures are just useful idiots.

They are complicit in abuse; they are accomplices.

You can’t reason with somebody who wants to promote harm.

Karen White?

He’s responded to my tweet, and is asking me for examples of how a predator has claimed to be trans to gain access to women or kids.

Can anyone point me somewhere with a summary or set of examples? I’m sure I saw something perfect on Twitter yesterday but can’t find it.

I’m trying to be very clear that my issue is not with trans, but with the ease with which it can be used as a shield by a predator.

ZuttZeVootEeeVro You have hit the nail on the head re the appropriation of language describing women’s oppression.