From Guardian item:
In Connolly’s case, much has been made of her sexual predilections, but, really, so what? It doesn’t mean that she fantasised about being beaten, killed or leaving her young daughter motherless. Besides, rough sex means different things to different people, and even very serious BDSM practitioners would have a safe-word to stop things going too far. This overplayed rough sex angle comes across as cynical victim-blaming – it fails to explain 40 injuries and bleach sprayed on her face.
Then another disturbing thought – that the CPS might have a point. That extreme violence against women by their partners, even when it results in death, remains so systemically downgraded in this country that trying for a guilty murder verdict could result in men such as Broadhurst walking free.
We need a statement from the CPS so that we know why they decided to accept the plea to manslaughter and drop both the charges of murder and GBH along with assault by penetration.
And, despite the sentencing remarks, I'm nowhere near understanding why the judge opted for Category C rather than B.