Apple's billion dollar investment directed at allowing men into women's bathrooms

Some of us have non-homicidal ways of enjoying the holidays!

As long as your disapproval is appropriately festive AAK

Not sure if or , Ereshkigal.

I kind of wish in cases like this MNHQ would ban the person but leave their comments up, just for the education of future readers. It really is quite eye opening to see what kind of man thinks cocks in women's spaces is an excellent idea.

Absolutely agree.
It only benefits the person banned.

Not least as they are then able to claim they've been censored just for having an alternative view etc.

Sorry that was to Datun.

Kitten - it was that funny.

Even a rolly laughter emoticon from you

I put a solid layer of chocolate (melted and left to harden) on top sometimes when I make mince pies. I'm sure some will disapprove but they are lovely.

I wonder if they deleted his comments from the thread he necroed to talk about buying prostituted women too?

No nor the other few threads he was all over.

I kind of wish in cases like this MNHQ would ban the person but leave their comments up, just for the education of future readers. It really is quite eye opening to see what kind of man thinks cocks in women's spaces is an excellent idea.

I know, really sad to have missed the comments! Hopefully my experience of the rhetoric of this type of person can fill in the gaps in my imagination.

Where do all the people like ffs appear from though with their made up stats as if we'd never heard it all before?

I also think iced mince pies sound even mankier than the normal kind.

To be fair, he probably does have a disease-free penis. What with nobody being willing to touch it and auto-infection not being a thing.

Happy to look at unexpected petunias. Penises, not so much.

Maybe he thinks he has a special disease proof penis, Mary. Teflon coated maybe?

I'm a bit worried about iced mince pies though, I must say.

That was my next comment. I can't work out if evil genius or just EVIL.

Apparently he thought that grabbing a woman by the "skull" (not sure why he didn't say "head" like a normal person) and physically forcing her head in a particular direction was the only possible thing that could be meant by the suggestion that women would rather not have to see penises in our changing rooms. Because he'd just look away, see.

And also that our main objection was just looking at a penis! (My swipe keyboard doesn't seem to recognise penis and wants to type petunias instead!)

I think our friends have been shown the door, haven't they? But reading through just wanted to pick up on this:

Assuming 1 in 500 people are transgender, and roughly 65 million people in the UK, then there are 130,000 transgender people in the UK.

Why would we assume this? The trans lobby figures estimate 1% of the population. So 650k.

Assuming half of those are transwomen (this may not be correct, but for the sake of argument) then there are 75,000 transwomen in the UK.

So "for the sake of argument" when he didn't have a clue? Apart from the recent rise in young women identifying as trans and "non binary", I'd personally guess most of these people are male. Speculation though, if slightly more informed by knowledge and experience than Mr PJ.

I missed the skull comment. Was that Jane Fae-inspired?

That's just uncivilized.

I'm a bit worried about iced mince pies though, I must say.

So sad to have missed them!

Meanwhile, our non-deleted friend is presumably hard at work on their upcoming Christmas hit "Baby, If You Have The Bloody Nerve To Complain About Your Rights Being Eroded I Hope You Die Soon".

Think I'll stick with the original, personally.

That's the one who pretends to be a woman teacher and, within a couple of posts under the new name, starts on about how they won't let their pupils go to the toilet.

I mean, at least the Piss Troll is creative.

...Do I want to know about this?

I mean, at least the Piss Troll is creative.