Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Apple's billion dollar investment directed at allowing men into women's bathrooms

564 replies

QuietContraryMary · 14/12/2018 08:13

<a class="break-all" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20181214081045/www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2018/12/13/tech-firms-helped-knock-texas-bathroom-bill-apples-1b-campus-fatal-blow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">web.archive.org/web/20181214081045/www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2018/12/13/tech-firms-helped-knock-texas-bathroom-bill-apples-1b-campus-fatal-blow

" Big businesses helped kill the Texas bathroom bill two years ago, targeting it as discriminatory and unnecessary.

They said the legislation, which would have required Texans to use the restrooms that match their sex at birth, would have hampered efforts to woo new companies to the state and turned off convention planners and sports leagues looking at venues for events.

Now, some companies are doubling down on that commitment, citing diversity and inclusivity as factors in their decisions. Apple made this clear Thursday, when it announced a $1 billion investment in the capital city.

The bathroom bill, or something like it, may be back when state lawmakers meet in 2019. But opponents of these restroom regulations say the business community will again give them the ammunition they need to shoot down such divisive legislation.

OP posts:
Sparkyduchess · 14/12/2018 22:57

FamousPJ what a ridiculous comparison. I’m not aware of any woman who has threatened a man with her breasts.

Why oh why are you so desperate to ensure that men can access women any where they please, I wonder?

HestiaParthenos · 14/12/2018 22:56

Lovely. Do you like women? More to the point - Do they like you? Why are you on a feminist board telling women why they are wrong?

Because women in real life can get away from him, I suppose.

I really wish there was a women only subforum here ... I mean, men would probably go there to share their manly opinion while pretending to be women, but perhaps it would be possible to kick them out again.

FamousPJ · 14/12/2018 22:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AngryAttackKittens · 14/12/2018 22:55

I think "I imagine" pretty much sums up our new friend's contributions to the debate.

FamousPJ · 14/12/2018 22:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Bubonicpanic · 14/12/2018 22:54

This veers back and forth from the hilarious to the abusive.

It is incredibly how indoctrinated people are into believing only bigoted women would want to restrict the amount of male genitals they are exposed to. This is the cult of the dick pic of course. Same people.

TallulahWaitingInTheRain · 14/12/2018 22:53

OK I'm bored now

but it's been a great thread in a FAQ kind of way, good work everyone

Yarnswift · 14/12/2018 22:53

I read the Norwegian case when it came out (I’m fairly ok at written/read Swedish and Norwegian isn’t so different)

It was reported here (Sweden) quite a bit. The uk media reporting was accurate.

So pj your argument is it doesn’t ever happen,, oh that case? That probably did t happen? Those other cases? Probably did t happen or theyre lying.

Lovely. Do you like women? More to the point - Do they like you? Why are you on a feminist board telling women why they are wrong?

FamousPJ · 14/12/2018 22:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

7Days · 14/12/2018 22:52

I think this guy's a trainee.
There will be a print out at the end of the couple of hours and someone more senior will break out the red pen.
its going to be the shit sandwich technique.

'Do you see here? That was quite good. You formatted that post very well.
I'm a little concerned about this bit here......and here...... and this bit..... how might you reword this in future interventions? mmmmhmm. well, we can discuss that, of course. Perhaps more training....
But, on the positive side, your use of spellcheck throughout was spot on. Welcome aboard.'

Shite, thinks the supervisor, its only half past ten GMT on a Friday night. Why do they always send me the shite trainees at the start of the busy time.

Qcng · 14/12/2018 22:51

How many sides does a cock have?

howlsmovingcastle84 · 14/12/2018 22:49

MsMcWoodle
Don't forget- some people's grasp of biology is very poor these days.

FamousPJ · 14/12/2018 22:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ChewyLouie · 14/12/2018 22:46

Interesting phrase there - juvenile sense of disgust and fear towards male anatomy.
Is the next target going to be silencing the juvenile sense of fear and disgust exhibited by juveniles towards adult male anatomy?
Everyone needs to praise and welcome the cock, dissent is not tolerated.
I don’t use this very often, but fuck off.

EverardDigby · 14/12/2018 22:44

You do realise that you are on Mumsnet? Think it through. Take a while if you need it

GrinIt was immaculate conception for me!

MsMcWoodle · 14/12/2018 22:40

a juvenile sense of disgust and fear which women feel towards normal male anatomy.
You do realise that you are on Mumsnet? Think it through. Take a while if you need it.

HomeStar · 14/12/2018 22:39

Sex offenders will target anywhere that's easiest, which in their mind, might be a mixed-gender toilet. That doesn't mean they would stop offending if mixed gender toilets didn't exist

Ahh. I understand now, thanks for the insightful explanation. There's a fixed quota of sex crimes that must be committed by every pervert, and once the pervert has used up his quota for the year then no more offences will be committed. So, you see when you look at it that way, it doesn't matter whether toilets and changing rooms are arranged in a way that gives sex offenders the opportunity and cover to offend.

Except of course doesn't actually work that way, and sex offenders are opportunistic and when they have more opportunities to offend they commit more offences. Who the hell is this ridiculous person coming in and mansplaining absolute SHITE to everyone?

Also, in Norway (which has self-ID) it has already happened that a woman has been accused of harassment based on transgender status for challenging a man's presence in the women's changing rooms. In the USA women have had their gym memberships cancelled for raising questions, even when the "transwoman" was behaving in suspicious ways that suggested she might be surreptitiously filming.

But it's so great that this guy has come here to share with us that he imagines things like that wouldn't happen! I mean, if the Famous PJ imagines it's not going to cause any problems, who are we to argue, and indeed who is reality to argue, with the imagination of the Famous PJ?

Qcng · 14/12/2018 22:32

I seriously doubt this is how things would work in practice because it's obviously open to abuse. I imagine in reality, a transwoman would be in a position to present evidence that she has been living as a woman, whereas a biological man would not be able to do so

Have you been living under a rock?
This is exactly what has been playing out over recent years.
It's exactly how Lily Madigan gained a position in the Labour party through an all-women's shortlist despite only "living as a woman" for a very short while.
It's exactly how rapist Karen White gained a space in a woman's prison where they sexually assaulted and raped 4 female inmates.
It's PRECISELY how all of those sexual abuses in Target stores were able to take place.
It's how Rachel Mckinnon was able to break a a women's cycling world record despite only "living as a woman" for a short while.

Transwomen ARE biological men. Biological men only need to utter the magic words "I identify as a woman" and ta daa women are instantly screwed over.

Bowlofbabelfish · 14/12/2018 22:32

Nuns!
Reverse!

Grin

Come on, keep telling us why we are wrong. We’ve got data for everything and it’s great to have a thread to put it all down. You’ve done a grand job.

I’m still waiting for my cash from the Christian Right btw.....

LangCleg · 14/12/2018 22:29

Lots and lots of Kleenex.

FamousPJ · 14/12/2018 22:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

R0wantrees · 14/12/2018 22:28

I seriously doubt this is how things would work in practice because it's obviously open to abuse. I imagine in reality, a transwoman would be in a position to present evidence that she has been living as a woman, whereas a biological man would not be able to do so.

'The cautionary tale of Karen White, the transgender rapist'

"Karen White is a rapist and child abuser who has committed several acts of sexual violence against vulnerable people. One of the women Karen White raped was pregnant. Karen White is now going to spend a long time in jail.

Next week, a Government consultation on reforming the Gender Recognition Act 2004 will end. That’s the law that allows someone, for example, born male to be legally recognised as female, under certain conditions: you have to show you’ve lived in your new gender for two years, and a doctor has to certify that you have gender dysphoria or another condition that underpins your transition.

Some people think those conditions should be relaxed. They say the state has no business asking people to prove their own identity and that such rules are an unfair burden on transgender people who have quite enough trouble already in a society where they suffer prejudice and worse. The people and groups who make this case sometimes say that the “gatekeeping” elements of the gender change regime should be removed, so that a person can change legal gender on the basis of their own testimony, and nothing more.

The ministers who announced the consultation haven’t clearly said what they think about this, but Theresa May has said she wants to “demedicalise” the GRA process, and Penny Mordaunt, the women’s minister has said similar things.

What does that slightly technical Whitehall process have to do with Karen White and the women Karen White raped and abused?

Karen White attacked some of those women in New Hall prison, a women’s prison. Karen White, then awaiting trial for rape, was in New Hall because Karen White says Karen White is transgender. Born male and still possessing a male body (including the penis used to rape that pregnant woman), Karen White was treated as a woman by the prison service, because Karen White said Karen White was a woman." (continues)

blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/10/the-cautionary-tale-of-karen-white-the-transgender-rapist/

Apple's billion dollar investment directed at allowing men into women's bathrooms
howlsmovingcastle84 · 14/12/2018 22:27

It's very fortunate that sex offenders walk around with 'I am a sex offender' written on their foreheads then.

TallulahWaitingInTheRain · 14/12/2018 22:27

You are aware that Karen White is a sex offender who took advantage of the system in order to continue offending (in the real world) and no law existed to stop 'her'?

MsMcWoodle · 14/12/2018 22:26

Compassion. Not to women and girls, especially those who have been abused. We don't want men in our spaces.
What is wrong with men who can't take NO for an answer? It's just more abuse.
What decent man would behave like this?

Swipe left for the next trending thread