Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Church of England transgender blessings

111 replies

howonearthdidwegethere · 11/12/2018 14:33

You'll never guess what...

The policy announced today was drawn up by...three transwomen (who are priests), at least one of whom describes themselves as a trans lesbian.

The guidance was compiled in consultation with the Rev Dr Tina Beardsley, the Rev Sarah Jones and Canon Rachel Mann who said in a joint statement: “Collectively, we have sought to ensure that these new pastoral guidance notes provide a rich and generous space for trans people to locate their lives in the existing liturgy for the affirmation of baptismal faith."

www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/church-offers-blessing-to-transgender-people-qfzznztx7

In the meantime, the CofE won't marry gay couples.

OP posts:
userblablabla · 11/12/2018 17:14

R0wantrees there is several comments using that very term.

R0wantrees · 11/12/2018 17:08

Ah another thread full of calling trans women ‘men in frocks.’ But mumsnet is NEVER transphobic, not at all.

Its not full of what you claim.

Please stop with the false allegations.

userblablabla · 11/12/2018 17:07

Oh come on. You can’t truly believe that referring to trans women as ‘men in frocks’ isn’t transphobic? Seriously?

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 11/12/2018 17:03

But by the very nature of some of them being male bodied, and wearing a dress, in some cases this it a fact. Not transphobic but a fact.

userblablabla · 11/12/2018 17:00

Ah another thread full of calling trans women ‘men in frocks.’ But mumsnet is NEVER transphobic, not at all.

Squall · 11/12/2018 17:00

From a c of e standpoint, I really can’t imagine that they are really drinking blood. It is quite clearly a representation.

How this relates to men believing that men can be women is not something that I can explain, though.

silentcrow · 11/12/2018 16:55

I can never get my head around being able to hold the belief that "God is infallible, omnipotent, all-wise", and yet could manage to put a soul in the wrong body. Or is it minimum wage angels on the assembly line these days?

Mind, I fell out with the church as a teenager when nobody would answer, orveven engage with my question "what if Christians are wrong and Muslims, or Hindus, are right?" Hmm so what do I know.

Fontofnoknowledge · 11/12/2018 16:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

vaginafetishist · 11/12/2018 16:47

Yes a massive no from me too.

vaginafetishist · 11/12/2018 16:46

At the lecture Rachel Mann described being in a group of female priests who regularly meet with male priests who don't accept women's ordination. Rachel Mann took part in a march for 100 years of women's suffrage under a banner depicting them as Rosie the Riveter. Insight isn't a major gift here.

HestiaParthenos · 11/12/2018 16:46

Trans is more acceptable than gay, it seems, in a parallel world where wine can be turned into blood and everyone better believe it is real. (Or is that just the Catholic Church?)

This is all very patriarchal.

Dragon3 · 11/12/2018 16:43

Tina might well be a lovely person and otherwise good chaplain, but Tina Beardsley talks about being a 'woman with a transsexual history' and is appropriating womanhood. That does affect me. It hurts me and I resist it. Tina became a priest when only men could become priests.

It's as big a no from me here as it would be outside the church. No.

The celebratory tone is inappropriate and will certainly make it more difficult for wives and family members to seek support. A neutral response, accepting the person whilst neither condemning nor celebrating their transition would be more appropriate IMO.

vaginafetishist · 11/12/2018 16:42

Rev Rachel Mann also gave the Southwark Cathedral Annual Feminist Lecture this year.. I would say their understanding of male privilege is zero.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 11/12/2018 16:37

The news report kept saying ‘gender’ this morning so I almost lost my voice yelling ‘Sex, sex ITS BLOODY SEX’.

I worked for the c of e when the whole women bishop thing was happening (it really was a hardcore tiny minority that opposed that). I’m glad I’m not there now - don’t think I could take the stress.

Potplant2 · 11/12/2018 16:36

Rachel Mann certainly wasn’t born female, you must be thinking of someone else. Rachel has written an autobiography (Dazzling Darkness) and a book about her family’s memories of the First World War, in both of which Rachel is clear about having been born and grown up male. Rachel transitioned as an adult and I think Rachel also identifies as lesbian.

Rachel is an accomplished poet and writer and is highly regarded in the Church (Rachel is an honorary Canon, which is a title only given to well-regarded priests).

I have met Rachel and found Rachel likeable and respectful. I think Rachel’s books show some, limited, understanding of the privilege Rachel has, especially in the church, from having grown up male.

vaginafetishist · 11/12/2018 16:32

According to Rachel Mann, Rachel Mann is a 'transwoman' and a lesbian.

vaginafetishist · 11/12/2018 16:31

Rachel Mann was not born female!!!! What are you talking about?

ErrolTheDragon · 11/12/2018 16:29

For some reason discussions about the CofE often remind me of this:

"Alice laughed: "There's no use trying," she said; "one can't believe impossible things." "I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

With the caveat that in the case of the CofE some of those things can be mutually exclusive.

In the grand scheme of things, this (along with other inconsistencies) probably adds to the sum of human happiness.

R0wantrees · 11/12/2018 16:25

Jenny Murray Sunday Times article March 2017:

'Be trans, be proud — but don’t call yourself a “real woman”
Can someone who has lived as a man, with all the privilege that entails, really lay claim to womanhood? It takes more than a sex change and make-up'

(extract)
"The first time I felt anger when a man claimed to have become a woman was in December 2000, when the Rev Peter Stone announced he had undergone the radical surgery to transition from male to female and was now called Carol. Her primary concerns, she told me, were finding the most suitable dress in which to meet her parishioners in her new persona and deciding if she should wear make-up or not.

Her transition had taken place a mere six years after the Church of England ordained the first 32 women priests, at a time when the idea of a female bishop was still regarded as impossible and when parishes were allowed to refuse a female vicar if there were objections.

I remember asking Carol what she owed those women who had struggled for so long to have their calling to the priesthood acted upon. His calling, as a man, had never been questioned. I had nothing but a blank look and more concerns about clothing. “I know it sounds silly,” she said. “But I’ve nothing to wear.”

Too right it sounded silly. I thought of all those women who had spent years and years challenging what being female had meant as they sat in the pews on a Sunday morning: 2,000 years of institutionalised patriarchy; no woman but a virgin mother and a handful of tortured saints to look up to; women only good for refreshing the flowers, raising the kids and making tea for the vicar.

Even after women’s ordination had been allowed, the discrimination continued to rage. In 2000, the Rev Vivienne Faull became provost of Leicester Cathedral, the most senior woman in the Church of England at the time. She told me then that the church was awash with believers who thought a woman’s place was in the home or in a pew, wearing a hat. She had to contend with a canon who refused to celebrate services with her and would not receive holy communion from her hand.

I wondered when Carol would experience what so many newly ordained women had heard from fellow priests as they passed through the vestry. “Pulpit pussy”, they told me, was the favoured insult, and they found it demeaning, disgusting and it hurt.

It was news to Carol that life as a woman, especially a middle-aged woman, stepping into male territory in which she was unwelcome would be extremely tough. I prayed Carol would not find it so hard. Experience told me otherwise. It wasn’t going to be all about frocks and make-up. It was about sexual politics and feminism — ideas of which she seemed woefully unaware." (continues)

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/be-trans-be-proud-but-dont-call-yourself-a-real-woman-frtld7q5c

misscockerspaniel · 11/12/2018 16:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LavenderBush · 11/12/2018 16:17

I agree with WorkingItOutAsIGo .

I'm a big fan of Tina Beardsley - a genuinely kind, reflective and intelligent person. I very much doubt she's going to have put her name to something that does anyone any harm.

HPD76 · 11/12/2018 16:16

I can’t speak for the others, but Rachel Mann was born female and is non binary. She’s also very lovely and inspiring.

Dragon3 · 11/12/2018 16:11

I find this deeply, deeply offensive. MTF transgenderism is appropriation. Appropriation of the struggles of women and lesbians, groups that have been denigrated throughout church history. And appropriation in a way which encroaches on the boundaries of present day female members of the church.

Would they allow reaffirmation of baptism for a white person who 'came out' as black? For an able person who came out as transabled?

the way that transitioned males are being heard at the top of the church when women have had to fight hard and are still only good for making the tea

Yes.

Procrastinator1 · 11/12/2018 15:59

I'm not a member of the Church of England, but I do hope that it wall also support those who might be left behind after such a change, wives, children, family etc.

akkakk · 11/12/2018 15:58

Is this the same church that has exemptions to stop women being bishops?
There are female bishops in the CofE

This is simply a non-sacramental service (i.e. not baptism) - however, there is a theological issue in that while Synod agreed that transgender people should be welcomed into the Church (Biblically - all people should be welcomed, Christianity is non-judgemental of people) - that does not mean that the Church should be welcoming / condoning the actual transition - it is one of the biggest confusions in the Church today, that you should welcome and love the person even where you don't welcome / love the act... all to often these are confused and it is assumed that you must therefore welcome the act - not so, Christ in the New Testament is very clear about loving sinners, but not sin / prostitutes, but not prostitution / tax collectors, but not tax collecting / etc.

In putting out this message, it is suggesting that churches should condone transition which is not Biblical - the Bible is clear, mankind was created by God Male and Female - not random, fluid genders...

The reality is that I suspect the CofE will implode over the issue of sexuality - just look at GAFCON (founded 2008 in Jerusalem) to see the growing trend around the world to return to a Biblical understanding of God and His plans etc. - the current approach of the CofE is in considerable conflict with this Biblical approach, and it will be interesting to see where that ends up...

Swipe left for the next trending thread