Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Period poverty / 'bleeders'

446 replies

Beagadorsrock · 10/12/2018 14:07

"
❤️Jane Austen was a Super Plus fan, Lizzie preferred a Mooncup + Emma didn't leave Hartfield without her Thinx. But some bleeders in the UK can't afford sanitary products, imagine the scandal at the ball!💃🏽 Donate to @bloodygood__ this Festive Period & help someone's #flowhoho❣️"

twitter.com/ladycariad/status/1072068738147631104

Very disappointing. I can't believe we are back in the Middle Ages so comprehensively.
And no, using 'bleeder' is not "more inclusive" because it includes trans men. It is massively, massively reducing women to a (distasteful and historically considered 'impure') bodily function.

Can I start referring to men as "standuppissers"?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
stillathing · 10/12/2018 20:01

You can include transmen and non-binary women by simply referring to them, it's not hard.

Exactly this. Why is it I never ever EVER see "women, transmen and non-binary women" like that in a list? It's not actually about being inclusive, is it?

littlbrowndog · 10/12/2018 19:57

Fuck that latestes reply. Fuck inclusivity

Fuck off

OlennasWimple · 10/12/2018 19:56

How to turn a valid and important campaign into an insult to women and girls

It's like a group of Year 10 boys have been given "End period poverty!" as a GCSE Marketing project assignment

AssassinatedBeauty · 10/12/2018 19:55

This false assumption that to be inclusive means using words and language that are just awful towards women! You can include transmen and non-binary women by simply referring to them, it's not hard.

And all this guff about it was meant to be a joke... well what was the joke, or the light hearted intent? It makes no sense.

Mumfun · 10/12/2018 19:50

Bloody Good Period have replied to this as follows: twitter.com/bloodygood__/status/1072191849606066176

Their comment includes this:

Our mission is to ensure that we will soon look back on this row and wonder what is so incendiary about recognising the reality of all people who have periods'

How about recognising the reality that most 'cunts' (definitely preferable to bleeder) identify as women and girls and do not identify as bleeders?

They do not want to get it at all. The reality of being an adult human female or being a same sex attracted lesbian is being erased and they are contributing to it by being happy to dehumanise us when it suits them.

Ifonlyus · 10/12/2018 19:20

Thanks for the hey girls link. I will use that.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 10/12/2018 19:17

Nothing like insulting women when they really need help in purchasing a basic necessity.

Thank god they don’t volunteer in hospitals or where hair is donated to make wigs for people going through chemo.

‘Oi baldy - have a wig!’
‘Oi sicko - here’s your penicillin!’

Ifonlyus · 10/12/2018 19:14

It's a vile descriptor. I refuse to engage with anyone who refers to me as an involuntary action rather than who I am - a woman. Who do they think they are?!

Neurotrash · 10/12/2018 19:11

Like Trump on Megyn Kelly, 'bleeders' inspires nasty women.

dippledorus · 10/12/2018 19:06

I’m a cunt and a bleeder. Now fuck off you woke twat.

Do you think Twitter would have a problem with that?

dippledorus · 10/12/2018 19:04

Reductive language. Offensive as fuck. The woke bleeders can bleeding well bleed off.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 10/12/2018 18:58

Hmmmmm.

Dental cream ‘Oi gummy!’
Minoxidil ‘Oi baldy
Haemorrhoid cream ‘Oi sore arse’
Coop funeral care ‘Oi deid guy’

I’m getting the hang of this marketing lark.

Neurotrash · 10/12/2018 18:56

This person needs to read and understand the EA.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 10/12/2018 18:55

Shall we call the rozzers then?

pachyderm · 10/12/2018 18:55

Wouldn't it be great if Ann Summers marketed their Rampant Rabbits and dildoes to women by addressing them as "Hey WANKERS!"Xmas Grin

Pennydrew142 · 10/12/2018 18:55

I don’t think it’s worth it and I think the first reply is enough to show the position and attitude of the organisation and how it responds to women and potential donors. It’s not at all considering the feelings of the group targeted ( women ) about how they’re being referred. Yet whenever a trans person objects to a ‘misgendering’ the actual police investigate ffs it’s a hate crime while dehumanising language for girls and women is tolerated. Why? I already know men like oppressing us. Why the fuck are all these women standing in the way of our progress all the time? I’ve been campaigning on women’s issues all my life and I firmly believe we would of had a lot more progress if women like this weren’t so god damn eager to capitulate to men.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 10/12/2018 18:51

Is actually prefer if they used the c word to be honest.

Theperfectchangeling · 10/12/2018 18:51

How is it an inclusive organisation? They dont care how offensive and reductive that hateful term is to the very people they purport to be helping! That does not make them inclusive, it just makes them idiots.

Angry
ChristmassyContessaConSparkles · 10/12/2018 18:48

Bleeder. Confused

Bleeder? Hmm

BLEEDER?! Angry

Fuck them and the horse they rode in on!!

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 10/12/2018 18:48

Just saw their response Penny. Oh wow - what a bunch of cahhhhhhs (since they are using the vernacular). I do hope someone posts it on twitter...

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 10/12/2018 18:46

Well. the comments are 99.9% amusing but the tweet is still up there.

Bleeders and breeders. Charming.

And if anyone is interested, local foodbanks generally accept sanitary products and do t insult you (or their clients).

Theperfectchangeling · 10/12/2018 18:45

Ugh. Bleeders. What a diminutive ‘woke’ pile of wank.

They can go fuck themselves.
And then, go fuck themselves again.

Please do share that response Penny! It’s time this kind of stupidity was exposed!

thatwouldbeanecumenicalmatter · 10/12/2018 18:43

Funny how defining “woman” as “adult human female” is “dehumanizing” and “reducing people to their genitals” but calling women “bleeders” (or “uterus bearers” or “vagina havers” etc) is not.

Innit.

And I donate pads etc to my local food bank and The Red Box Project so not I’m not getting upset about the ‘wrong’ issue.

Neurotrash · 10/12/2018 18:38

I find the term extremely degrading. It does make me think of those women and girls banished to cow sheds during their periods. And I feel it smacks of the hand maids tale. Like gestators, an empty vessel to produce babies in.

Here we are again; Orwell x brave new world x handmaidens tale.

VickyEadie · 10/12/2018 18:34

Oh, I think you should share it, Penny!