The original article IS interesting, anyone could agree on that. Well the subject matter could be nothing else, and it is well crafted of it's type.
Whether it is very helpful though?...….
The tone was oddly familiar, and I've worried about that for a few days, and it has come back to me where I ( almost ) recognise it from.
It reminds me very strongly of the written documentation of the therapeutic guidance ( underpinning was the phrase often used) we came across in schools for emotionally and behaviourally troubled teenagers in the 1970s and 80s; well written, presenting itself as of the time and well informed, and yet, strangely unhelpful when questions such as what should be done, how should it be done, and how would we assess if it had been done properly, or done at all. Somehow, not throwing much light on the matters in hand.
Stylish, and sort of impressive in it's way, but ultimately, in the words of Alan Bennett, it doesn't move us any further forward.