Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trans Women Should Be Allowed In Women Only Spaces

341 replies

KiBob · 18/11/2018 16:18

I posted a few days ago that I need help arguing a case on the debating website Kialo. Thanks to your suggestions I've got one claim accepted that I was struggling with.

I'm now trying to get a new claim past admins.

As a supporting claim to:

"Allowing anyone who identifies as female into women-only spaces makes those spaces worse for cis women".

I put this:

"Trans women are 6 times more likely to commit a crime and 18 times more likely to commit a violent crime compared to female controls as found by this study In Sweden in 2011". With a link to this study:
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885

Admin have responded:

"Hm, interesting link. However, the results don't differentiate between trans men and trans women, and also state this: "Transsexual individuals were at increased risk of being convicted for any crime or violent crime after sex reassignment (Table 2); this was, however, only significant in the group who underwent sex reassignment before 1989." - so this might be a bit outdated - 30 years is pretty long.
Further up, in the Abstract, under results it also says "Female-to-males, but not male-to-females, had a higher risk for criminal convictions than their respective birth sex controls."

Can you point me to the exact place where you get your numbers? Thanks!"

Help!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Ereshkigal · 22/11/2018 00:17

OP I think the transcrime data was painstakingly compiled from media reports.

Ereshkigal · 22/11/2018 00:16

KiBob You 've missed out one step - showing the evidence that transwomen in women's spaces commit a disproportionate number of offences. There is no good evidence.

What offences are we talking? Because we've no crimed voyeurism and indecent exposure just with TWAW,

KiBob · 21/11/2018 16:52

How reliable is the data on the transcrimeuk.com website?

I've tabulated it and done some sums. I'm sure it's not perfect but blimey! Even if it's only a bit correct, it's quite damning.

Note the 4:1 ratio of M2F : F2M is considered by many to be incorrect in the direction that actually makes M2F look better in this table than in actuality.

Am I missing something obvious?

Trans Women Should Be Allowed In Women Only Spaces
OP posts:
DadJoke · 21/11/2018 12:03

KiBob You 've missed out one step - showing the evidence that transwomen in women's spaces commit a disproportionate number of offences. There is no good evidence.

KiBob · 21/11/2018 01:39

@Birdsfoottrefoil nice! I have totally ripped that off. TY

OP posts:
Birdsfoottrefoil · 20/11/2018 23:55

It is impossible for transwomen to be in women only spaces since their presence means they are no longer women only spaces. By entering the space that space immediately becomes a mixed sex space.

Ereshkigal · 20/11/2018 23:16

It’s up to those advocating change to provide conclusive data.

THIS.

AspieAndProud · 20/11/2018 22:37

I think in the absence of reliable or conclusive data, it is not appropriate to state your own conclusion as fact.

It’s up to those advocating change to provide conclusive data.

EarlyWalker · 20/11/2018 22:20

I think in the absence of reliable or conclusive data, it is not appropriate to state your own conclusion as fact.
Based on the BBC fact check, I will also say that the proportion noted is based solely on trans inmates serving a longer prison sentence, so more likely to be for serious crimes (such as sexual offenders)
I agree that the number is high, I also note that the data is based on self ID and basically relying solely on the word of a convicted criminal and that in its own right, is ludicrous.
Putting myself in a rapists mind, facing maybe 4 years imprisonment, I’m not surprised they would claim to be transgender to try and get closer to woman.
Another reason why self id is ridiculous and does not belong in prison or anywhere frankly.

I’ll post the California prison study
Thank you.

nellodee · 20/11/2018 22:13

One of my greatest concerns with the identification of trans women as women is that it makes collections of statistics almost impossible. How can we make evidence based decisions, if the decisions we make prevent the collecting of evidence?

Ereshkigal · 20/11/2018 21:59

I’ve read FPFW’s article and commented above that I couldn’t find anything that proves the claim that transwoman offend at the same rate as men, could you point this out for me? I see details of transwoman in prison (100 males) there is no data as to how many transwoman there are in the UK to back up that this is higher or lower as a percentage than men or woman.

I'll post the California prison study. But don't you think in the absence of any reliable data on how many MTFs there are, the relevant figure is the proportion of sex offenders within the MTF trans prison population compared to the men's one and the women's one?

EarlyWalker · 20/11/2018 21:54

100 Males to females

EarlyWalker · 20/11/2018 21:54

Ereshkigal

I’ve read FPFW’s article and commented above that I couldn’t find anything that proves the claim that transwoman offend at the same rate as men, could you point this out for me? I see details of transwoman in prison (100 males) there is no data as to how many transwoman there are in the UK to back up that this is higher or lower as a percentage than men or woman.
I’ve not read the Californian one, could you provide a link?

Someone who identifies as means they see themselves as/consider themselves to be.

Ereshkigal · 20/11/2018 21:40

There is no concrete evidence to support the claims that transwoman offend at the same rate as men, post Sweden 1988 so you will struggle to have any valid points that will be taken seriously to call for the full exclusion of all Transwoman.

There are. You are not informed. Who knew Grin btw FPFW and a Californian prison study suggest that they actually offend at a higher rate.

FWRLurker · 20/11/2018 21:27

"who says they identify"
"anyone who identifies"

I'm a little confused what is the difference between these two statements? I thought the working definition of "identifies" is "claims they are". There's no way to verify such a claim either way.

EarlyWalker · 20/11/2018 21:09

Imo I think it’s far easier to argue the point of ‘allowing anyone who says they identify as a female into woman only spaces will make those spaces worse for cis woman’

Stating anyone who identifies as a woman, applies to transwoman and not dangerous predators pretending to be a woman

There is no concrete evidence to support the claims that transwoman offend at the same rate as men, post Sweden 1988 so you will struggle to have any valid points that will be taken seriously to call for the full exclusion of all Transwoman.

KiBob · 20/11/2018 19:55

I've encountered both counter arguments now.

I say, bad actors will abuse the right to self identify and gain access to vulnerable women.

They say, "show me the evidence, there is no evidence".

So I say, "well it has been shown that transwomen commit crime at a rate similar to men".

They say, "no they don't that's not true, that's down to a few bad actors skewing the stats".

OP posts:
KiBob · 20/11/2018 19:52

Now IMO I don't actually believe that transwomen are a higher risk threat than men. I do believe predatory sexual offenders are claiming to be trans for various reasons.

Which backs up the OP in fact, which if you recall was:

""Allowing anyone who identifies as female into women-only spaces makes those spaces worse for cis women".

OP posts:
dolorsit · 20/11/2018 17:23

Waiting for train so will be brief.

By your own ballpark figures transwomen show an offending rate twice that of women.

The fact check figures were showing that roughly 40/50% of known transwomen are in prison for sex/violent offences. Massively higher than the offender rate of men or women.

I brought up the fact-check because the number of transwomen (around 130 from memory) is significantly higher than the figure quoted in 16/17 report. I was very surprised at the increase.

Now IMO I don't actually believe that transwomen are a higher risk threat than men. I do believe predatory sexual offenders are claiming to be trans for various reasons.

Of course this is drifting from the op so sorry for the derail.

Ok train is late so not so brief sorry

EarlyWalker · 20/11/2018 17:01

I’m still very confused as to what the data proves...

So FPFW have confirmed 100 inmates who have declared themselves as MTF transgender in prison but do not hold a GRC (as this wouldn’t show on data?)

Statistics currently suggest around 650,000 transgender people in the UK. For arguments sake let’s split it 50/50 so its more in your favour as everything I’ve read suggests there are a lot more transwoman than transmen.

So 325,000 Transwoman in the UK, 100 in prison. So 0.02% of transwoman are in prisons.

3952 woman out of about 32 million in prison so as a percentage 0.012%

80,704 men out of about 31 million so as a percentage 0.26%.

I really don’t understand how any of the stats published by the BBC or FPFW prove that ‘trans woman continue to offend at the same rate as men and are the same risk as men’?

dolorsit · 20/11/2018 16:01

Could someone please post the link to the BBC fact check of those figures as I'm on the move and I feel a bit rude not linking as earlywalker came back and posted.

Thanks

UpstartCrow · 20/11/2018 15:57

Fair Play completed an FOI request. It does not make for comfortable reading for anyone who is concerned about women's rights.

fairplayforwomen.com/prison-data-confirmed/

dolorsit · 20/11/2018 15:53

Sorry I think we are at talking at cross purposes. I'm taking about the recent BBC fact check on the number of transwomen prisoners.

I haven't read the report you just posted but will do later. However I made the perhaps the incorrect assumption that your photo talks about people identifying as either male or female and not as their "sex" therefore classed them as trans men or women.

It's one reason why I asked for the report, so I can read the footnotes and definitions.

dolorsit · 20/11/2018 15:47

Oh I can see that this was published in November last year. If it's an annual report I should be able to see how the latest figures tally up with FOI rather soon.

Thanks again

Swipe left for the next trending thread