Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?

Rollon is very funny

Who is suing who now?

I’m going to start suing these blokes who are offending my ducking ears by spouting absolute shite. It’s literal violence I tells ya.

BREAKING NEWS *

On hearing the news that violent offender Justine Roberts is being sued by Hayden, West Yorkshire police step up their protection of Hayden's self-identified properties.

(Mrs. Doyle clip)

“WITH HIS LAD IN HIS HAND...”

“Tonight on more4, the terrifying spectacle of..WHEN GLINNERS ATTACK...!”

(Dramatic music)

(Sadface interviewee) “there was a comedic setup” (sniffs..) “impeccable timing..” (sobs) “surreal humour.” (Wrings hankie.)

Tonight at nine!

Stephanie Hayden, who is also suing Mumsnet and recently sued a transsexual solicitor, now identifies as a lawyer

PMSL

Presumably the deployment of police officers will have to be doubled now in order to protect many of Hayden's properties.

In case Justine attacks?

Stephanie Hayden, who is also suing Mumsnet and recently sued a transsexual solicitor, now identifies as a lawyer.

"Hayden, who told RollOnFriday that the police were guarding three of her properties in case Linehan attacked, denied striking anyone with a golf club and emphasised that she was never convicted of striking anyone with a golf club."

Hilarious.

www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/exclusive-transgender-lawyer-suing-graham-linehan-was-convicted-threatening-man-golf

Well, would you look at that! Hayden exposed again

I'm thinking of setting up a company called "Hayden Seek".
Just sublime
(I'd add an exclamation mark but someone's used them all)

Harrop actually said this according to the Open Democracy article
:It’s not unusual for harassers to protect their own identities with anonymised accounts, Harrop said, nor is it uncommon for them to “come back in another incarnation” if they’re ever suspended for their comments.

Ahahaha burn.

The gift that keeps on giving is our Steph

Adrian Harrop, an NHS doctor and LGBTQ+ activist, said that frequent, sweeping claims that present trans people as “sexual deviants and predatory criminals” appear to be “radicalising” others against trans rights online.
Source: OpenDemocracy as per breastfeedingclownfish link above.

Still describing himself as "NHS doctor" misrepresenting this as NHS policy.
Still perpetuating the same old lies.
Still pretending to be a Labour supporter whilst keeping in with the extreme Right.
Still a close friend of the confidence trickster who trolls complainants of Dr Harrop to the General Medic and/or speak up for the Safeguarding of Women and Children.

We see you.

Have you really had 10,000 views on that video Lisa? How wonderful.

And Haddock is back again

www.opendemocracy.net/5050/sophie-hemery/online-platforms-enable-deluge-hatred-against-trans-women-uk

Do make sure to list yourself as company president under the name Evil Genius.

"Hayden Seek".

My god birdseye / not only are you doing their research for our hypothetical journalist friend youre wroting their punning headlines!

Genius! 😂. By close of business tomorrow and for the cost of a few Grande Gingerbread Lattes, I could be legitimately known as the Director of Fantasy Profiles Ltd. and I’ll just ignore correspondence from companies house, tell HMRC I'm not trading, order some business cards, fail to submit my confirmation statement, get struck off, rinse and repeat. Sorted.

I'm thinking of setting up a company called "Hayden Seek".

MyEyes Snap! I think that it is the washing motion that triggered it.
I've been thinking also that certain businesses need to register re money laundering and found this link below.

www.gov.uk/guidance/money-laundering-regulations-who-needs-to-register#businesses-covered-by-the-regulations

From what I gather, if you are running, for example, a legal firm or one that runs some kind of credit checking service, and the sole officer is not covered by a legal regulatory body, then you need to be registered under the Money Laundering regs with HMRC.

Way out of my depth here but would definitely be interested in comments.
Still keeping it hypothetical, of course.

This came to me when I was doing the dishes, and well, it's so obvious I’d forgotten.

Companies House, Did You Know?

• that you do not have to provide any form of verification of ID, so no proof of ID or proof of address, to form a limited company. There are no checks. So I could use an alias to set up a limited company. If I filed on line first thing tomorrow morning and paid £12 (yes that’s all it costs), I could be registered by close of business. Clearly I’d get no where if I tried to open a business bank account if I didn’t have the appropriate ID documents. But as a vanity project it's fairly cheap as then I could legitimately call myself a Director.
• if I wanted to form using an accountancy practice say, they would have to verify my ID to comply with money laundering legislation/know-your-client.

Any man who says he is a woman would therefore know that we don't believe him.

It's like in Red Dwarf when Creighton terminated his upgrade by blowing his fuses - by telling him that there is no android heaven! (but where do the calculators go?)

Surely any former man who is now a woman, a real woman, with a lady brain and all the womanly feelz, would know that women are more than high heels and lipstick? Because after all they feel just like a woman and what a woman is. They are indeed a woman. How come they'd underestimate their own sex? Surely they’d know that women can be many things and that women can have knowledge and expertise and education. Oh wait.