Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?

From the comments on the roll on Friday article: "Ms Hayden’s red faced gammon tantrum"

Are they trans? Some photos do seem to point that way.

I'm agog, but somewhat apprehensive about what I may learn.

What is their beef?

That is a very good and important question.

Who is this person? What is their beef? I’ve seen some photos where they are looking a bit ‘girly’ - is that their issue?

What do you mean hateswomen? He's a member of the Fallon Fox fanclub!

christ. someone with a daughter behaves like that.

i know some men hate women but somehow i expect fathers to know better.

the triumph of hope over experience

Definitely male Lord

I always thought the green one was a batty
Old lady.

Just in case you didn't, I have.

Hope you've screenshot that too. I predict it will mysteriously never have existed in 3-2-1. Pretty damning!

Unfortunately Mr. Billingham's review of Woodpark seems to have mysteriously disappeared.

Luckily I kept a screenshot, for those of us thinking of our taking our children to there. His review is very helpful.

Here's Mr. Sprout's thoughts on the same: twitter.com/TheOnlySprout/status/1053235798286524416

Bob's children are not responsible for the fact that Bob is a raging arsehole and should not be punished for the sins of their father. People are however allowed to point out that Bob is a giant festering pustule of a human being.

exactly.

However he is not so careful with his own identity (despite denials

Dear oh dear. A quick look on TRA Twitter is quite amusing. The usual suspects are all so gullible and believe his denial.

I am glad to see Billingham has been comprehensively pinned down.

He knows he has nothing to fear about his daughters' safety, because all the women he harasses and doxxes are fighting the powers that be in the name of safeguarding women and children. These women are all non-violent and care about human rights.

Billingham is a key strategist using IT and social media to erode all rights and protections which preserve women and children's safety where they effectively restrict penis entitlement and perversion.

Billingham can sit on the bench next to Tatchell.

The link about Tea Uglow, that is.

Just looked at that link, and was struck by this bit re the 2015 TED talk.

Yes. She does look a lot like a boy in this video.

A boy. Notice they don’t say man. “She looks like a boy”. Way to completely manipulate and try to hide the fact this this is a distinctly ADULT human male, to play down the very evident maleness.

To play down the fact that this is a male who has arrived at where they are now, in a male dominated field, with all the extra help that you get for being male. (With typically male size/stature, incidentally, as is clear from the footage of them next to a woman of the adult human female type.)

Also notice that in the TED talk they don’t do that constant smiling-when-they-talk thing that they do in the more recent interview about their role/trans journey. Because one of the essential features of womanhood is to smile all the time you talk, to show how lovely and non-threatening you are, right?

Yes Helen has an @mermaids email address.

I would note that he recently doxed Lily Maynard, a doxin which was liked by 'Helen' @ mimmymum who complained to Mumsnet and got her name redacted.

So basically these people (Helen, James, TRAs in general) are constantly doxing people and then screaming like stuck pigs when their own identities are disclosed.

Helen from Mermaids Team was delighted by this recognition by Tea Uglow at Brighton Trans Pride
Tea Uglow has international influence, works for Google etc
teau.me/about/

If a member of Mermaids Charity Team has a designated role paid or voluntary, their use of social media (especially when connected to the charity's purpose) should be open to scrutiny. As would be the case with any other charity, especially one in receipt of considerable public funds.

The account helen @ mimmymum has tweeted a huge amount of comment as well as regulalry retweeting the likes of Sprout, Guiliana London etc
It is reasonable to believe that vulnerable children, young people and concerned parents involved with Mermaids will likely be viewing and / or influenced by helen @ mimmymum's Twitter stream.

incidentally, there was some suggestion in the summer that Tea Uglow was Lily Madigan's 'transmum'

I have to admit that I laughed at "Kiwi Farms would never do anything like that". Is he new to the internet?

Yes. Basically saying ‘bob1 is the same person as bob2’ is fine.

ACTIVELY posting anything at all with identifying family details - not on. I’m always uneasy with those newspaper pics of person X out with family and just the faces covered.

Contents of Bob1’s account are Bob1’s responsibility and cannot be used as a shield against people pointing out that bob1/2 are the same person. Otherwise you’d have a situation where it was illegal to unmask anyone if they had anything at all with a pic of their kids online under different names.

And as noted above, plenty of people seem to dislike the small brassica - there’s no evidence this was a feminist.

Yes I think there is a difference between 'here's a picture of this stupid woman's kids', and 'X is Y because X says his daughter does taekwondo, and here's a picture of Y's daughter doing taekwondo with her face blurred out, X said he was on holiday in Naples, here's a picture of Y & family on holiday in Naples', and so on.

Ok, fair enough! I think it’s about context. Posie & I are open about who we are so the digging up of our family photos is wholly unnecessary.

Unmasking a serial abuser is another matter, but I’d just be cautious about the kids who are innocent parties.

"But kids’ schools (even if he did tweet them under his ‘innocent’ account) ought to be out of bounds. "

Nobody mentioned his kids' schools. Only him. I'm just pointing out the sort of content he puts online.

There's a bit from here which is quite grim, about 'trolling', illegal images of children, racial slurs, etc.

archive.is/OqXWP