Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Work reproach regarding my social media usage in trans discussions

33 replies

VladmirsPoutine · 27/10/2018 14:34

I'm wondering what, if anything, I can do. I have a Twitter account which among other things I use to tweet news articles, Brexit updates, the bagel offerings at the café down the road and so forth but increasingly I have retweeted people with GC views on the trans discussion.

I do not work in a role related to the social media management of my organisation but we do have a sort of generic social media policy that outlines the usual things such as not bringing the organisation into disrepute. Thus far none of my musings have done so - as it's not a line I wish to cross and I'm very wary of a backlash having seen it happen to others.

However, at some point during the past couple of weeks a senior manager 'had a word' and in effect told me to be more "mindful" of the content I tweet/retweet as the organisation "does not tolerate discrimination". This has never been an issue until my recent tweeting of articles and assorted tweets by those I think are making valid contributions to the wider trans discussion and the role of women within it.

To give you a couple of examples of the things I have tweeted; please do point out where I have crossed the line and stumbled into impudence:

  • Recent news story about a transwoman whom pretended to be a 14 year old boy in order to groom a young girl. I retweeted someone who commented under an article that had used 'Woman' in its headline as opposed to 'Transwoman', something along the lines of; why be a determinist about time because if the predator can be a woman why can't they also be 14 years old.
  • A story about the unfairness of a transwoman who had won a cycling race.
  • The use of the #NoDebate hashtag serving as yet another convenient tool to silence and denigrate women who take an alternative view to the dogmatic "Transwomen are women. Full stop. #NoDebate".

Apologies for the essay but I'm caught between going back to just tweeting about bagels and cream cheese, the occasional news story and leave it at that; but equally I also want to scour twitter for more GC views to retweet as frankly I don't want to be silenced.

OP posts:
VladmirsPoutine · 27/10/2018 15:17

I do have the standard disclaimer in my bio about my views not being those of my organisation which incidentally I haven't named in my bio. But I do use my real name and I'm also on a 'social media' list that was made by the External Outreach department who often encourage us to tweet out their statements/blogs/reports and the like.

The senior manager in question is not my direct manager but someone I do work alongside. But the conversation left me with more questions than answered because it was a very casual chat, if you like, not an arranged meeting. And I'm wondering if that conversation might count as a warning of sorts? And if so do I get a right to respond or defend myself? I honestly don't want it to be escalated and become a disciplinary but then again the logical part of me can't see how my tweets and retweets even if they were to be read out infront of a management panel would be seen as so egregious as to be in contravention of the organisation's policy.

OP posts:
Binglebong · 27/10/2018 15:17

Coyoacan it's a private account- it is designed for whatever the private individual want to use it for.

Coyoacan · 27/10/2018 15:08

I don't think it is an unreasonable policy actually.

I was told off for including political information on a whatsapp group for my condominium and I apologised. Just use that tweeter account for the purpose it was designed for.

BettyDuMonde · 27/10/2018 14:54

Unfortunately, the current climate means that many women can not afford to be outspoken using their real world names.

Every woman must weigh this up according to their own risk.

Those of us with less to lose (something Posie has taken on board, brilliantly) have to pull up our giant knickers and get our heads above the parapet, knowing that as the tide changes, our anon/closeted sisters will be emboldened.

Don’t feel ashamed if you decide the back seat option is the safest for you right now - that’s why we are a collective action -covering each other’s backs as need be.

Also, your senior manager needs to give their head a wobble (I hate that phrase, but it’s very useful)!

AspieAndProud · 27/10/2018 14:45

This is why I support anonymity on the Internet.

The Civil Service Electronic Media Policy, for instance, is one of the most draconian I’ve ever seen.

The fact that Sp!ked now links comments to Facebook is one of the reasons I won’t post on GC articles anymore. It’s more than my jobs worth.

Fundays12 · 27/10/2018 14:40

Remove your place of work if it’s on it any reference to it.

PrincessHairyMclary · 27/10/2018 14:38

Just make a new twitter account, be anonymous and keep your job intact.

Trinalbcnotanonman · 27/10/2018 14:37

I put retweets are not endorsements in my bio.

Swipe left for the next trending thread