Men are taken out of the equation when reporting violence against women or the killing of women because, over time, the sheer repetition would mean we couldn't avoid questioning the harm of our patriarchy and social structures.
The patriarchy is harmful to so many groups and very probably underpins an amount of male on male violence and death. And it's certainly expensive in so many ways (the financial cost pales into insignificance when contrasted with the emotional, civic, social, familial and other costs).
HairyStorm wrote something interesting in another thread:
When we're talking about oligarchy, we're not talking about the malesuperior/femaleinferior concept or the injustices of its manifestations. We're talking about a different sex of power relations. In an oligarchy, the elite is the particular small group of people who get the superior tag added to their group. Everyone else gets the inferiority tag. And what we see in the real world is: within oligarchies, even the males at the very bottom of the power heap still benefit from malesuperior being infused in everything, because there are still women around taking on everything associated with the femaleinferior concept.
So these men who want to "dismantle the patriarchy" because they don't like oligarchy aren't actually proposing the dismantle the malesuperior/femaleinferior dichotomy [do I mean dichotomy or binary? Not sure; but you get what I mean]. They're proposing to dismantle a separate power structure - but they've learned that the name for The Elite, The Powers That Be, The People Who Run The World etc etc is "patriarchy".
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3404163-Wheres-your-personal-feminist-analysis-currently-at?messages=100&pg=1