Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Oxford Student newspaper doxes Twitter account by possible criminal unauthorised use of a comptuer system

244 replies

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 14:29

Heads up.

www.oxfordstudent.com/2018/10/26/transphobic-tweets-linked-to-oxford-sociology-professor/

"The Twitter account, named Henry Wimbush and still online at the time of publication, has been tweeting statements such as “transphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons” since first Tweeting in January.

"it was found that the account in question could be linked to a partial phone number and Yahoo! email using freely available data and by making use of Twitter’s various functions. The Yahoo! email itself is also linked to a phone number ending in the same numbers as those previously identified, while also revealing that it is connected to the" [partially redacted email]

How this hack works:

go to twitter.com/login

click 'forgotten your password'

type in your username, or a third party's username

you will get a message something like this:

We found the following information associated with your account.
Text a code to my phone ending in 12.
Email a link to ab*********@a.**

Note that:

  • the last digits of the phone number can be used to tie your account to any phone number, since there are obviously 100 different combinations, so if it matches a phone number known by the doxer, it essentially identifies you
  • I'm not clear exactly how much information is given on email addresses in every case, but at a minimum you get the first two letters of the username (before the @), the first two letters of the domain name (the bit after the @), and the exact length of both parts of the address.

So for example, if you signed up, anonymously, to Twitter using the email address justine*@mumsnet.com, then it would show to any attacker ju******@mu.** if they tried to recover it in order to dox the owner.

The use of this feature in order to dox people most likely constitutes an offence under the Computer Misuse Act s1 as the use of this feature to dox people is clearly not authorised by Twitter, and I would encourage those affected to report the people involved to the police.

Hence I am not repeating the criminally obtained dox of the person, and I would encourage people NOT the repeat the name in this thread.

Note that this doxing follows quite soon from Aimee Challenor boasting of outing Miranda Yardley's Twitter account using the same means.

Whether there are more serious offences committed is hard to say, as the doxing itself is obviously a preparatory act to having people fired, harassed, threatened, family & children harassed, and so on, but the doing so is not necessarily planned by the original doxer so it would be hard to prove a more serious offence.

I would advise those who are on Twitter and are not using their real name to create a gmail/yahoo/other anonymous webmail account, matching the twitter username (so if you are @ARealRadFem on Twitter, make a yahoo mail account [email protected]). In terms of the phone verification that's a little trickier as the 1/100 last two digits is VERY outing if they have a suspicion who you are, but otherwise completely useless. I have had some luck in the past with adding an extra digit (so if you are 07812 456789, you can add an extra digit on like this 07812 4567890, and verification phone calls still work), but YMMV on that.

OP posts:
Bonions · 26/10/2018 19:08

There are some right wankers there!

BiologyIsReal · 26/10/2018 19:05

Not having been to Oxford I was always under the impression that its students were intelligent, open-minded critical thinkers.

Then along comes Orange.....

Datun · 26/10/2018 18:51

Dear lord.

Orange:

I am not actually making a judgement on its justification or not.

Also Orange (a split second later. In the same post in fact).

he should be exposed to journalistic criticism by the student paper for his didgusting conduct on twitter.

Also Orange

Wrong, arguing against their inclusion is transphobia. And thats not even the relevant part. He misgendered her, which is against University guidelines and is transphobia.

Which is wrong. There are explicit exemptions under the equality act to exclude men identifying as women from women's sport. Unless Orange thinks the equality act is transphobic. (Wouldn't surprise me).

Lmfao and lol - also Orange. Channelling his inner stroppy teen.

GoldenWonderwall · 26/10/2018 18:48

Fascinating. The moral highground seems to be in the same place as the fracking drills in Lancashire.

It is true you can tell someone’s sex by how they write on anonymous Internet forums imho. The sheer joy some men get from threatening people’s livelihoods because they don’t agree with them. You can see how totalitarianism gets the foot soldiers, they’re practically begging to be let loose on the rest of us.

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 18:46

This is someone who was in fact very careful not to say what their job was, what kind of field it was in, nor the nature or identity of their employer, but they are pretending that it was all spelt out there.

There was no 'I work as a lecturer', 'I am a professor', 'I work in a university', 'I live in Oxford'

ONLY illegally accessing a computer system for the purposes of outing.

Absolute fuckers.

OP posts:
Materialist · 26/10/2018 18:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 18:42

You note that they DON'T link to that Tweet, nor do they quote it, because this is not journalism it's just a hatchet job, and by alluding to this quite, they can pretend that they did some great Miss Marple effort, rather than, in reality, illegally accessing a computer system.

I do hope these boys aren't planning to get a job in a real newspaper in the future, because this is desperate, desperate stuff.

OP posts:
QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 18:39

The people who wrote this really are disingenuous bastards.

They said

"While this could refer to Oxford Brookes, the account references an update to their employer’s trans policies in a Tweet in February 2018. Oxford University last updated its transgender guidelines in March 2018, while Brookes’ was in May 2017, "

The actual Tweet
twitter.com/MrHenryWimbush/status/958895447430574080

"My employer's rules now say that not respecting someone's gender is a disciplinary offence. This has not yet become an issue for me as I've only encountered handmaidens (who turned me into a TERF!) but I would be concerned when the new generation (higher % trans) hit."

This person was hacked purely and simply by hacking. Everything else is a smokescreen, and they've desperately tried to clutch at straws to gloss over the fact that they illegally used the 'recover password' function to dox this man.

And now they're saying it's not illegal, because, um, reasons.

Bog-standard TRA gaslighting bollocks.

OP posts:
scepticalwoman · 26/10/2018 18:37

Reading this makes me realise that all women have to do is expose these views. Every time the general public is exposed to the bullying authoritarian TRA approach, they recoil. We're a sophisticated democratic society and the believe what I say or you're a transphobe just doesn't cut it.
When you add to that the flashers, sex offenders, extreme porn advocates etc currently trying to undermine the safeguarding of children and women, most people, especially parents draw a line.

Sometimes it seems we just have to watch and wait.......

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 26/10/2018 18:33

the article is hilarious. it begins

Please note that this article contains explicit discussion of transphobic statements and images

then later quotes this gross piece of transphobia which was tweeted by henrywimbush:

transactivists are used to safe spaces where their ideology is affirmed and never challenged

I mean, kind of proving wimbush's point there people.

apparently the tweet was accompanied by a snowflake emoticon (presumably this is the transphobic image referred to in the warning?). I'm a bit worried about our bright academic future given that OS felt the need to add

“snowflake” here used as “a disparaging term for a person who is seen as overly sensitive and fragile

aww. diddums.

pombear · 26/10/2018 18:32

Imnobody

That update makes me think of this image.

The trans/poly/QIA movement is currently eating its own tail!

Oxford Student newspaper doxes Twitter account by possible criminal unauthorised use of a comptuer system
TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 26/10/2018 18:32

Are you sure this is a safe space for you, Imnobody? Mumsnet is a known hotbed of polyphobia.

Bonions · 26/10/2018 18:31

I recently learnt that I was at the same college as shon Faye (if the info from google is accurate) and there are only a few years between us! completely irrelevant trivia

FermatsTheorem · 26/10/2018 18:27

Is "polyamorous asexual" a posh way of saying "I know loads of folk I wouldn't touch with someone else's"?

Imnobody4 · 26/10/2018 18:24

I've just read the article - at the end there's a correction..........
A previous version of this article described polyamory and asexuality as mutually exclusive. We acknowledge that this is not the case and have amended the article accordingly
I can now confidently assert my identity - I am a polyamorous asexual. Any acephobes on here have been warned.

pombear · 26/10/2018 18:22

Vicky

He's merely said/written some facts
Facts = big red button of 'transphobia'.

Facts are not good.

Facts are bad.

Feelings are good.
Hurting feelings through stating facts is bad.

Get with the new world order Vicky !

Tanith · 26/10/2018 18:12

"Can't help but laugh at the idea that the ones getting thrown out of Oxford are the students lmfao"

If they have misused online facilities (by hacking, for example), then they risk expulsion or, at the very least, may be banned from using the computer services, which tends to screw up their degree in any case.

I would hope no Oxford University student would be so stupid as to risk their degree in this way, though.

VickyEadie · 26/10/2018 18:05

I cannot see for the life of me what he's said that is in any way 'transphobic".

He's merely said/written some facts that the TRAs don't like.

MsMcWoodle · 26/10/2018 18:03

Critical thinking punished at Oxford. What a sorry state of affairs.
They obviously don't teach history there.
Disgusted with this.

Materialist · 26/10/2018 17:57

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Misteryise · 26/10/2018 17:54

Oxford university has become intolerant of dissenting views. The union is increasingly a safe space for these little brainwashed snowflakes, as much as I despise the term. Marine Let Pen was no platformed a while back. To me her views are abhorrent, but I welcome the opportunity to dismantle them in public. Perhaps the other students need to grow a backbone, particularly our friend Orange.

BeUpStanding · 26/10/2018 17:36

Wow, Orange, who the hell do you think you are? I wish there was something I could say that would pierce your massively inflated ego or make you rethink your pompous and sneering tone, but you seem to so gleefully revel in being vile that any attempt would clearly be futile.

I sincerely hope that you soon develop some critical thinking skills and grow out the sadistic tribalism phase you are currently in.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 17:33

Melanpipe This is my deep concern. Without wanting to derail the thread with my long-held fears of the impact of the Primary literacy strategy and the way Literature is taught in schools, this really matters.

I'm going to take my own advice and go have a walk with the dog!

Sarahconnor1 · 26/10/2018 17:32

mobile.twitter.com/TheOxStu/status/1055776814138834944

The article is going down well on Twitter.

Melanippe · 26/10/2018 17:29

Not at reading literature for understanding.

Agreed, but they do seem to think that 1984 is an instruction manual. It seems to be a thing at the moment.

Swipe left for the next trending thread