Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A moment of pause to venerate Janice Turner

158 replies

EmpressAdultHumanFemale · 25/10/2018 13:48

twitter.com/VictoriaPeckham/status/1055425954988859392

A moment of pause to venerate Janice Turner
OP posts:
2rebecca · 25/10/2018 17:22

Janice not Janet. No idea where Janet came from

3TresTrois · 25/10/2018 17:21

Janice is brilliant.

I went off the Guardian a couple of years ago as it was consistently setting my Woke-dar off with massive bleeping.

I will be buying myself a subscription to the Times in the new year because of JT.

2rebecca · 25/10/2018 17:21

Another one who got a Times sub because of Janet. I heard this morning that JHB's breakfast talk radio programme has gained 17% new listeners. I'm one due to her non woke interview style. No special soft voice for transwomen from her. All will be interrogated and subdued!

genderrefusenik · 25/10/2018 17:13

Sod it, I have just subscribed to The Times on the strength of Janice's articles and other decent coverage on this issue in the paper

TheClitterati · 25/10/2018 17:10

What has the Guardian done to itself? It's no longer fit for purpose as a newspaper.

rightreckoner · 25/10/2018 17:04

I don’t buy the Guardian anymore. I buy the Times because of Janice and the generally higher quality of the writing.

I did buy a copy of the Spectator the other day but was relieved to find that James Delingpole continues to be a knob so the world is still turning on it’s axis.

Now100 · 25/10/2018 16:56

I love the way they are begging for money after each article. At some point I might email them to say that I'll give them some once they start respecting women. Suspect they don't want my evil terf money anyway.

Spasm0dic · 25/10/2018 16:54

My period is coming on. If all we are now is our periods, shall I start talking to men about it? Been protecting their sensitive ears thus far.

WhereYouLeftIt · 25/10/2018 16:52

"I wonder how many women have taken out subscriptions to the Times because of Janice's journalism? Now that would be an interesting stat for the things MNers buy thread."

I did.

FermatsTheorem · 25/10/2018 16:51

Janice you are a star.

And yes, you're why I took out a Times sub.

And furthermore, fuck off Guardian.

gendercritter · 25/10/2018 16:46

I don't Eppur, but I guess some are so this still needs tackling. They are in dire straits, I believe, so I can't imagine they'll last much longer.

MnerXX · 25/10/2018 16:44

Yay to Janice for taking no bullshit!

rightreckoner · 25/10/2018 16:43

Can anyone cheer me up by telling me how badly they are doing financially ? They need to go bust, ideally whilst owing Owen Jones some salary payments.

I say this as a once devoted Guardian and Observer reader.

Eppursimuove · 25/10/2018 16:39

why does anybody still read the Guardian? Apart from the army of the Woke

Melamin · 25/10/2018 16:37

Surely the word they are looking for is mxnstruators?

Janice is Brilliant.

VforVienetta · 25/10/2018 16:32

Gobsmacking levels of bullshittery.

hipsterfun · 25/10/2018 16:28

It could have been worded ‘women who menstruate’ but because the rest of the article had no attempt to erase women, I’m not so sure this is a clear case of trans politics at large

Me neither.

But the G can still fuck off.

Badgerthebodger · 25/10/2018 16:23

Brava Janice - total shero.

I now have a Times sub, entirely due to her fantastic journalism

rightreckoner · 25/10/2018 16:13

Also it’s not even an accurate write up. The survey asked women, some of whom had never had a period and therefore were not menstruators. Those who had were asked about period pain - now or in the past - ie including those who were once mensturators but are no longer. The catch all term for these people is women.

Does the Guardian need a revision course on Venn diagrams.

genderrefusenik · 25/10/2018 16:11

This is a bollocks and has made me delurk to comment.

I just made a complaint to the reader's editor: www.theguardian.com/info/2014/sep/12/-sp-how-to-make-a-complaint-about-guardian-or-observer-content

Arguing that it contravenes the editorial code under section 12. Discrimination, which frustratingly talks about "gender" instead of "sex", but does mention "perjorative" language.

Shame it says "individual" too, and they'll prob reject it on those grounds, but I am so sick of this shit, not letting it go any more

BreakWindandFire · 25/10/2018 15:59

I just read the article and it does say ‘women and their petiods’ many times and only once says “asked 548 menstruators”

It's because the tweets from the Guardian publicising the article only refer to 'menstruators'

gendercritter · 25/10/2018 15:56

It is dehumanising. I menstruate. I'm not a menstruator. I'm a woman.

If they were reporting on something to do with bowel cancer would they say 'shitters....'? They bloody wouldn't and they know exactly why.

And this stupid word is supposedly kind and considerate to men. Yet it just makes me think of girls around the world who have to go and live in horrible dirty huts every time they have their peiods and the girls who get told they're unclean and are ostracised every single month for years of their lives. The girls who are treated like animals.

We should be going in the direction of destigmatising periods rather than this.

placemats · 25/10/2018 15:45

For those that can't read the poem it's here to print off.

irischild.blogspot.com/2018/03/menstruator-and-other-words-that-rhyme.html

terryleather · 25/10/2018 15:43

Janice Turner is fabulous and I adore her.

The Guardian on the other hand are a bunch of woke misogynist fuds, I wouldnae gie them a lick o' ma shite !

Datun · 25/10/2018 15:22

Can someone tweet that Irishchild poem to Janice.

Swipe left for the next trending thread