Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Major children's charity, Stonewall, Mermaids and gender

80 replies

DoriF · 24/10/2018 21:00

Delurking on this board to air some concerns I have about Action for Children [formerly known as National Children's Homes]. Here's what they're about, from their website www.actionforchildren.org.uk

From before they are born until they are into their twenties, we help disadvantaged children across the UK.

We help them through fostering or adoption – and by intervening early to stop neglect and abuse. We make life better for children with disabilities. We influence policy and advocate for change. Our 7,000 staff and volunteers operate over 522 services, improving the lives of 301,000 children, teenagers, parents and carers every year. We succeed by doing what’s right, doing what’s needed, and doing what works for children.'

www.actionforchildren.org.uk/what-we-do/about-us/equality-and-diversity/

Their Diversity Policy states that protected characteristics under the 2010 Act are:

Age
Disability
Gender
Gender reassignment
Marriage and civil partnership
Race
Religion or belief
Sexual orientation
Pregnancy and maternity

Of course they have rewritten this - I'm sure everyone here knows that 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Act. So here we have yet another influential organisation [I'm also looking at you, BBC] subtly and sneakily influencing in favour of the trans agenda.

Scroll down the same page to see information about the charity's association with Mermaids on a creative project.

And just a few days ago @actnforchildren tweeted thus:

Action for Children
‏Verified account @actnforchildren
Oct 19

Action for Children Retweeted Stonewall

We're incredibly proud to be among the 100 organisations showing their support for #TransEquality through @stonewalluk's #ComeOutForTransEquality campaign! #StandForProgress

But it's the rewriting of the Act that really grinds my gears. Unless organisations that are doing this are held to account this insidious practice will continue to grow.

OP posts:
EndoplasmicReticulum · 24/10/2018 21:19

Am I misremembering or is their new leader the person who used to be in charge at Girl Guides?

WorkingItOutAsIGo · 24/10/2018 21:18

Isn’t that the ex head of the Girl Guides. I think that’s where she moved to.

Capretta · 24/10/2018 21:15

Can someone message them and inform them that they are incorrect about the protected characteristic re gender and send them the correct info...

JamPasty · 24/10/2018 21:14

God that's grim. Have you tried messaging them about their error?

arranfan · 24/10/2018 21:13

Yes! And, why would members of the public feel that they needed to fact check established organisations like Action for Children?

Yet again, it feels like they're taking advantage of their halo status to mislead people to the point where it verges on abusing our trust.