Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trans activists smoke bomb protest the metro

255 replies

Bonions · 19/10/2018 17:35

Jim Waterson
@jimwaterson
Trans activists have set off smoke bombs outside the entrance to Northcliffe House, HQ of the Daily Mail/Metro/Independent. Unclear if they're protesting against the Mail - or the Metro taking the advert last week - but staff leaving by side entrance.

Consensus seems to be they're protesting against The Metro, which took an anti-trans ad last week. Unfortunately Metro print edition staff don't work Fridays. (The entirely separate Metro website has also had some trouble over the sister paper taking the ad, apparently.)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
JoanSummers · 20/10/2018 10:32

I'm also hoping for something in the Sunday papers.

deepwatersolo · 20/10/2018 10:30

No. I could swear I saw an independent article link on Twitter but cannot find it now. Must have dreamed it.

Gncq · 20/10/2018 10:29

Am I wrong, but I thought The Metro only printed Mon-Fri and had weekends off. Maybe they'll print something on Monday?
I'd like to think The Mail are preparing for a Sunday Mail article, but I have a sinking feeling not to get my hopes up for some reason.

Carrrotsandcauliflower · 20/10/2018 10:28

I worked in central London for years, and I can honestly say if that had been my office or next door I’d have been shitting it. Sorry but I would, anything like that gives me the jitters after 7/7. It’s intimidation. I can’t find it in any real news today.

Datun · 20/10/2018 10:26

I wonder if all the companies backing that Stonewall advert are suddenly wondering who it is they were actually supporting here.

deepwatersolo · 20/10/2018 10:22

Where did you hear of mistery person in parliament pushing this Kirk?

CaptainKirksSpookyghost · 20/10/2018 10:19

I hope so, maybe they been silenced by the mysterious person in parliament who is pushing this and reporting DD to the police.

boatyardblues · 20/10/2018 10:19

I'd like to think that's because the Mail have their sleeves rolled up, the knuckles of their typing fingers cracked, & are furiously banging out a zinger of a front page...

If the mood at the Times is as reported & with this attack on a media outlet, makes you wonder if a number of the the Sunday papers are busy doing the same.

AngryAttackKittens · 20/10/2018 10:17

Also, don't see smoke?

www.specsavers.co.uk/stores/full-store-list

You're welcome!

AngryAttackKittens · 20/10/2018 10:16

If the DM retaliates in print I will make popcorn for everyone!

Datun · 20/10/2018 10:15

I'd like to think that's because the Mail have their sleeves rolled up, the knuckles of their typing fingers cracked, & are furiously banging out a zinger of a front page...

Me too.

FekkoTheLawyer · 20/10/2018 10:13

Twitter is funny though. They are saying 'I don't see smoke' (video posted) 'I didn't see smoke' (video) 'no smoke') video.'Oh they were only singing and dancing!''How can that be scary?'

I do hope their adamence that annie lennox is 'one of them' is a big fat hairy liem

PurpleCrowbar · 20/10/2018 10:07

I'd like to think that's because the Mail have their sleeves rolled up, the knuckles of their typing fingers cracked, & are furiously banging out a zinger of a front page...

Honestly. Chucking fucking incendiary devices about, to demonstrate how fluffy & harmless & entitled to shower with your grandma after aquarobics they are?! Dim.

deepwatersolo · 20/10/2018 10:05

I saw an independent article I believe. Will try find it.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 20/10/2018 10:01

Metro might have decided not to give them the oxygen of publicity.

AbsintheFriends · 20/10/2018 10:00

The 'gotcha' tweets about the suffragettes have made my blood BOIL.

The thing was that in the early 1900s, 'smashing windows and blowing up letterboxes' WAS "male' behaviour. That's partly why they fucking did it - to get men to take them seriously and realise they weren't silly little women who would obediently shut up when told. Their aggressive behaviour was entirely UNPREDICTABLE, because they were women.

Exactly the opposite to the current bunch of spoiled narcissist TRAs, who have form for aggression and male bullying behaviour and want to further men's rights. (But reversal is always a favourite tactic of theirs, I guess.)

BigotedWoman · 20/10/2018 09:54

(Using his words, not mine btw - he described the Metro as as "anti-trans".)

BigotedWoman · 20/10/2018 09:53

If nothing is reported, will that not make some of the journalists think? E.g. Jim Waterston was tweeting about it, surely he thinks it should be reported on even though he is pro trans?

Acorninspring · 20/10/2018 09:29

I'm really surprised this hasn't been reported? At least by the DM / metro?

KatVonGulag · 20/10/2018 09:26

They are actually completely fucking stupid

Bonions · 20/10/2018 07:52

Still nothing being reported by the media, as far as I can see.

LOJ has retweeted this, which is nice. So glad he’s there to tell us to which acts are phobic, inciting violence and enforcing a toxic narrative (stickers) and which acts are on the right side of history (smoke bombs). Hoorah for kinder gentler politics!

Co-opting a women’s rights movement to celebrate the erosion of women’s rights is also joyous and wonderful.

Trans activists smoke bomb protest the metro
OP posts:
IdaBWells · 20/10/2018 06:02

OK now I’m confused, who is this group “Sisters Uncut”? Are they Transwomen mostly but they are co-opting the women’s suffrage movement colours? Are they confusing things by having people think they are radical feminists?

DoctorTwo · 20/10/2018 06:01

Had the bad-wigged lot been black or Muslim men, I’m sure the authorities would have responded with real force.

I agree. Their feet would not have touched the ground. These wastes of DNA have teflon coating, her majesty's finest are handling them with kid gloves.

Swipe left for the next trending thread