Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Reporting problems with the GRA consultation

54 replies

Oldstyle · 13/10/2018 17:25

Baroness Nicholson who invited WPUK, FPfW, TT to run a session on the GRA at the House of Lords) suggested that problems with the consultation - content, language, focus, process, publicity etc - should be reported. Apparently we can do so via members of the Women & Equalities Committee. Worth doing. This is so very important.

Here are some of the problems people have raised... sure there are more.

Consultation advised by TRA lobbying organisations. No women's groups or women's services consulted.
Poorly publicised (except within trans community). No public meetings arranged by govt / local govt.
No support for women who attempted to organise meetings to discuss the GRA. No condemnation of attempts to silence them or prevent them meeting, often by violent means.
No clear information available from govt, either about the GRA or the related EA. Contradictory/incorrect info supplied when specifically requested.
Focus almost entirely on the impact on trans people - few opportunities to explain the impact on women & girls who will be directly affected.
Language complex/academic & hard to understand. Frequent confusion with terms 'sex' & 'gender' - misuse is significant given the implications of the GRA.
Consultation has not been translated, further excluding those religious/cultural groups who rely on women-only spaces.
Govt Minister Penny Mordant began consultation by stating that TWAW and has met several times with Stonewall who are promoting the GRA change. She has not met with women's groups.
The collection of the data is suspect. Anyone from anywhere can complete it as many times as they wish.

OP posts:
CriticalCondition · 13/10/2018 17:57

This is an excellent idea.

Does anyone know if there are any particular members of the committee who might be more inclined to take the complaint seriously?

Mrs Maria Miller (Chair) Con
Tonia Antoniazzi Lab
Sarah Champion Lab
Angela Crawley SNP
Philip Davies Con
Vicky Ford Con
Kirstene Hair Con
Eddie Hughes Con
Jess Phillips Lab
Mr Gavin Shuker Lab (Co-op)
Tulip Siddiq Lab

FFSFFSFFS · 13/10/2018 17:52

re language - presents not widely accepted or evidence based concepts as agreed fact - I'm thinking of that non-binary waffle

Oldstyle · 13/10/2018 17:47

Yes, definitely worth including I reckon. Arguably, if the govt had acknowledged that the proposals impacted on women & girls, and that these voices needed to be heard, the unions would have been much more likely to have consulted their female members. And their female members would have been much more likely to have insisted on it.
From start to finish the whole thing is a travesty. Fair, balanced, accessible my arse!

OP posts:
SpannerInTheWorks · 13/10/2018 17:29

Would this include issues with unions?

My union have emailed me to confirm that , prior to being party to the TUC giving their unanimous support to self-ID, they consulted with the LGBT group within the union but no other groups including women's groups.