Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Woman, 41, pretended to be a boy to groom a girl

503 replies

TurfClub · 01/10/2018 13:50

Jacinta Brooks is a serial paedophile

metro.co.uk/2018/10/01/trans-woman-pretended-to-be-a-boy-to-groom-a-girl-7994533/

"Prosecutor Berenice Mulvanny said that police found screenshots of the conversation with the girl along with hundreds of child abuse pictures. Brooks gave no comment during a police interview but admitted she ‘couldn’t argue’ about being attracted to children. Miss Mulvanny said: ‘Brooks knew the girl was underage but sent her sexual messages. The defendant originally pretended to be a 14-year-old boy but soon admitted her real age.’

Woman, 41, pretended to be a boy to groom a girl
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
WhatInTheWorldIsGoingOn · 01/10/2018 14:13

So they are a man identifying as a woman impersonating a boy? So the man identifying as woman is ok but the line is drawn when they want to impersonate a boy whilst already being a man identifying as a woman? Is that right? So only one identity change per person? Is that the rules?

I’m a man impersonating a woman impersonating a man identifying as a woman. So I’ve gone full circle back to woman. I presume that’s all legal and above board?

This is total and utter madness and my brain has ceased to function for the rest of the day whilst it recovers. I’m out.

Howcansanepeoplesaynothing · 01/10/2018 14:13

This never happens. Nope, no sirree.

Noqont · 01/10/2018 14:12

So adult male pretends he is a woman and also pretends he is a child. Neither identify is true or valid. He's a man, who's a scheming vile peadophile. This identify is the correct one.

Redkeyboard · 01/10/2018 14:11

Will the crime statistics record this as a female crime now?

Crime stats and prison planning are swiftly going to become meaningless and impossible.

Callmejudith · 01/10/2018 14:08

HOW is it possible that this paedophile has even been allowed to be considered to identify as a woman - HOW?????

TurfClub · 01/10/2018 14:07

" I'm furious this could be recorded as a female crime"

could be? 100% for sure IS

OP posts:
Sarahconnor1 · 01/10/2018 14:06

Brooks, who was previously known as Duncan Smart, has previously faced the courts for having sex with someone who is underage and child abuse

Although I am glad that they have reported it this way because it very clearly shows the whole thing up for what it is. I'm furious this could be recorded as a female crime

TurfClub · 01/10/2018 14:05

Anyone know what he did the first time round? 13 years served is a very long sentence.

OP posts:
deepwatersolo · 01/10/2018 14:05

Yeah mumsnet, if we deny this person is a boy, then what?
If we deny the person is a woman, then what?

Do we have to call the person a boy-woman?

HawkeyeInConfusion · 01/10/2018 14:04

Wtf?

scepticalwoman · 01/10/2018 14:03

And which prison is this person in I wonder?

LinoleumBlownapart · 01/10/2018 14:03

I thought I had peaked. I hadn't.

ditto

deepwatersolo · 01/10/2018 14:03

or otherwise simply a boy, because it’s a person who identifies as a boy? Where is the line?

Exactly.

Redkeyboard · 01/10/2018 14:03

Mumsnet would you now ban or delete someone if they said this person is clearly a man?

Thebeautifullisette · 01/10/2018 14:02

deepwatersolo you raise a very interesting point.

Why is this a woman impersonating a boy?

Why is it not a man impersonating a woman (impersonating a boy), or otherwise simply a boy, because it’s a person who identifies as a boy?

Where is the line?

LyTinWheedle · 01/10/2018 14:02

The headline changed as did some of the body of text when I clicked on to another story. 'Woman' is now changed to 'Transgender' and a lot of the 'her's and 'she's have been omitted. There's been an obvious re-write since it was first posted an hour ago which is interesting.

SquishySquirmy · 01/10/2018 14:01

"Brook’s lawyer Robert Harding claimed much had changed in the time his client had been behind bars and she had struggled to understand social media and online networking."

Yeah, right.
Suppose it must be confusing for this person (would I get banned for saying "him"???)
Everyone seems to support and encourage their right to lie about one aspect of themselves, yet not their age.

Serfisafleur · 01/10/2018 14:01

Fucking grim male grooms childen online.

What's with all the "she"???

Trinity1976 · 01/10/2018 14:00

And I thought my chin hair problem was bad...

WhatisThisvideo · 01/10/2018 13:57

MAN PREDATOR MALE PAEDOPHILE HE

deepwatersolo · 01/10/2018 13:57

So, even if the male born transperson impersonates a boy to victimize a child, 'she' retains the right of female pronouns in the press? In statistics and prison facilities - will 'she' also be treated as 'female'?

This is not sustainable and the people won't stand for it. If the elites don't do a 180° this will end in barricades and pitchforks, 1789 style.

terryleather · 01/10/2018 13:56

I just...I can't even with this....

When the fuck will this ridiculous nonsense stop????

GulagsMyArse · 01/10/2018 13:56

Oh God, I really can't take much more of this.

bottomflannel · 01/10/2018 13:55

Holy shit...

IfNotNowThenWhen1 · 01/10/2018 13:54

I thought I had peaked. I hadn't.