Stil find this fascinating - the feminist groups where you must support TWAW are the same ones where Dolezal is utterly despised. They don’t see the connection because they don’t truly believe that women are oppressed.
Switch it out, and it’s the same arguments against, but one is tolerated and one isn’t. For example, change it up:
“For a men who had grown up with only a few magazines of stylized images of women to imagine themselves into a real-life female identity without any lived female experience, to turn themselves into a women’s history professor without a history degree, to place themselves at the forefront of local feminism that they had adopted less than a decade earlier, all while seeming to claim to do it better and more authentically than any woman who would dare challenge them—well, it's the ultimate "you can be anything" success story of male America. Another branch of manifest destiny...
Perhaps it really was that simple. I couldn't escape trans issues because I can't escape male supremacy. And it is male supremacy that told an unhappy and outcast white man that female identity was theirs for the taking. It is male supremacy that told them that any women who questioned them were obviously uneducated and unmotivated to rise to her level of wokeness. It is white supremacy that then elevated this display of privilege into the dominating conversation on black female identity in America. It is male supremacy that decided that it was worth a book deal, national news coverage, and yes—even this interview.“
Or this most of all:
“Throughout our conversation, I get the increasing impression that, for someone who claims to love womanhood, they bave little more than contempt for many women and their own female identities.
The dismissive and condescending attitude toward any women who see womanhood differently than they do is woven throughout their comments in our conversation.”