A deeply disturbed individual, whatever the reasons.
Very difficult reading.
I agree the trans thing is irrelevant in terms of the crime.
But not in terms of the jarring use of female pronouns and complimenting his bloody lock of hair.
Whatever the reason is, whether you think it's nature or nurture, women don't do this sort of thing. Or very rarely.
Women's rights and issues are based partly on their actual biology in terms of maternity and childbirth, female cancers etc, but partly on the inherent power dynamic between men and women which disadvantages them.
This relentless determination to pretend it doesn't exist is so pernicious. Using compelled pronouns through politeness and being 'inclusive' is wilfully obscuring examples and causes of misogyny.
It's exhausting trying to crowbar feminism 101 into every single aspect of this argument.