OK, that's even weirder. Not only have I never tweeted, or retweeted, I have also never liked anyone's tweets either. (And don't plan to - I don't have time in my life for engaging in any more social media, and if I did, I would never choose to engage in one that was such a Wild West in terms of lack of moderation. Just not my kind of thing.)
I follow a huge range of people on twitter, mostly work-related but also a wide range of random individuals with a diverse range of opinions and usually a good sense of humour. That includes some GC feminists but also some whose views oppose that. And the vast, vast majority are nothing to do with feminism or trans issues at all.
So is there really someone out there adding random names to Terfblocker just for daring to READ the views of a few GC feminists??! Not actually expressing an opinion on them either way? That seems to be taking thoughtcrime to a new level. I certainly hope Edward Lord has never spoken in favour of free speech or attacked others for stifling free speech - apparently now even reading the views of someone he dislikes is now grounds for him to block them.
And how do they decide - surely all the well-known GC feminists must be followed by loads of people who disagree with their views too, as is apparent from all those who leap in on their threads to disagree with their tweets. Does Terfblocker end up inadvertently blocking loads of its own supporters? This is just insane.
I am furious that I have been labelled as anti-trans despite having literally never expressed a single opinion on ANYTHING on twitter. Presumed guilty just for existing. 