That was an interesting read. On the one hand, I'm not a fan of psychoanalytic analysis - it always strikes me as a form of fantasy which is not amenable to scientific analysis.
Being fiction doesn't mean it can't hold truth, but only in the way that good fiction contains truth.
On the other hand, I am less and less convinced of the NAMALT argument, and this paragraph has considerable appeal, because it suggests that it is all men, but some manage to reconcile their anger.
"In his book, “Misogyny: The Male Malady”, anthropologist David Gilmore describes the near universal dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women that is built into the male psyche. He says it stems from unresolved conflicts between men’s intense need for and dependence upon women and their equally intense fear of that dependence—and the underlying reason for our anger is almost totally subconscious."