'Transwoman' blazes a trail across British Columbia to force salons to give 'Brazillian' wax, filing human rights complaints against 15 separate salons

the lawyers presented evidence to the tribunal that jy had also talked about being a trans woman online—in posts asking for advice on how to approach a naked ten-year-old girl to ask for a tampon, and whether it is appropriate to show a young girl how to use it.

I suspect this evidence will be brought up by the defence in all the other phoney cases jy has brought.

It demonstrates the highly sexual and predatory motivation of this person, thereby demolishing their bona fides as a litigant.

It’s funny how so many of these people claim they’re accounts were “hacked”. Very lax with internet security, these TRAs.

A peadophile using abusing a self ID loophole to get access to a 10 year old girl.

No one could see that coming!

That Economist article!

the lawyers presented evidence to the tribunal that jy had also talked about being a trans woman online—in posts asking for advice on how to approach a naked ten-year-old girl to ask for a tampon, and whether it is appropriate to show a young girl how to use it. jy denied writing the posts, said the account had been hacked, and withdrew the case. Over a dozen cases brought by jy against other women who offer Brazilian-waxing services continue.

If any of this is true, in a sane world JY would be either in psychiatric care or under investigation by social services and the police or all of the foregoing.

I'm pretty sure that strangers declining to touch your testicles is not a civil rights issue no matter how much this person would like it to be.

Reminds me of ‘Purple Aki’ making boys touch his muscles - only that was far less intimate.

It bothers me for a variety of reasons, the lack of biological knowledge being one.

It bothers me because ‘front hole’ defines the vagina as an absence and not an organ.

‘Front hole’ is reducing the vagina to a receptacle in which to put a penis. It’s not a ‘hole’. Transwomens neo vaginas may be holes, a vagina is not

I live in BC, and read about this case a while back, ridiculous doesn’t even begin to cover it.

As an aside does anyone happen to know any Canadian groups which are fighting for women’s rightism here? There is one group called Culture Guard but they’re specifically against SOGI being taught in schools. Incidentally they were going to hold a talk in our small town, only for the towns Facebook warriors to insist it be cancelled, which it was. So depressing.

Apparently 'J' wanted to show naked 10 year old girls how to insert tampons.

www.economist.com/briefing/2018/10/27/when-one-persons-right-is-anothers-obligation

It's so great that we are giving human rights for depraved paedophiles.

Miri1985

That is a real snapshot of women/ men in society

In general men have more money
Women's pain - is underestimated/ we can "take it"/ have to "get on with it" etc, men need to be comfortable. Unfortunately this crosses into the medical world where women's pain is often dismissed as imaginary at GP level, and at hospital level after surgery etc we are given less pain relief (our pain is not managed as well as mens)

I feel like we need a term for this sort of specific fixated one-issue querulous complainer. Like "vexatious lawsuits", but more specific.

Probably needs an invented word - profitatious lawsuit.

I've realised over the years that the main reason I don't go to beauty salons much isn't because I'm not vain (I am) or care about fashion and make up (I do), it's that I don't like being touched by people I don't know very well. Even a manicure is pretty intimate (especially when they do a hand massage as well), as is eyebrow threading or anything on your face really.

Women should absolutely not be forced to have physical contact with any man who they dont' want to, including and especially their genitalia.

As an aside, I feel very sorry for older beauticians who got into the industry before it was pretty standard to do brazilians / Hollywoods / whatevers. A bit of leg waxing, the odd upper lip, eyebrow shaping... Now they have to be prepared to whip off an unknown woman's pubes - and apparently also any man's ball sack hair if he asks for the service

The thing is there are male allies who would do this and expose it but they would feel uncomfortable harassing women in any way.

Because we are playing by rules and they fucking aren't.

Exactly, all Man Friday were doing was turning up and making a humourous, but serious, point. And, for that, the police got called.

Meanwhile, a transwoman demands that a Muslim woman handle their cock and balls, and when the salon doesn’t oblige, it’s off to court with them. If they’d turned up at the salon and whipped out their cock in a closed room in front of the woman, the police wouldn’t turn up if called (and, if they did, it would be to admonish the woman).

The entitlement of these men (the biological ones, not the Friday-identifying ones) knows no bounds. And, what’s worse, society and the law panders to and upholds that entitlement.

But they werent exactly trying to intimidate or 'pass' as men or intimidate anyone (or goad anyone into saying 'I say - you're not a man' so that they could scream 'hatespeak!!!').

They were very funny - I loved the older chap who pointed out in a very English manner that they were actually in the men's pool (as if one woman in a mankini and another top less one with a fake beard was perfectly normal).

Where are the women demanding to prance around naked in men only spaces flaunting their manboobs and mangina?

When the Man Friday chaps attempted a toned down version of this at Hampstead Ponds, the police were called. Funny how the outcomes are so different, isn’t it?

Yes exactly woman.

Whole thing is totally male and sex centred.

Off topic again, back to "holes" briefly... apologies if this is already patently obvious and I'm just late to the party but urethra is not the "front hole" because it doesn't count as a hole because men can't stick their dick in it.

Where are the women demanding to prance around naked in men only spaces flaunting their manboobs and mangina?

Oh, that's right - they'd be chased around with a large butterfly net and carted off by the folks in white coats. Bad women scaring the men.

Latinista, no you're not BU. The exhibitionists and plain, old-fashioned flashers have now found a way to swing their dicks around in front of women with impunity and, depending on how this court case goes, to even demand that women touch their genitals. All cheered on by woke "feminists" like Justin Trudeau and countless "progressive" MPs in the UK.

I’m building up a bit of a picture of men in women’s changing rooms, at children’s swimming lessons, and now Canadian beauty parlours ...
AIBU?
www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/exhibitionism

They just can't handle the fact that women can bond over things that exclude them.

I think that's true of a lots of males, regardless of their gender identity. That's why men in power are so happy to support the removal of sex segregation, because they recognise those spaces as places where women can bond and talk without men. Male people are very keen to remove the echo chamber of women talking to each other.

This reminds me of the TRAs who whinged and whined over the pink pussy hats on the women's marches. They just can't handle the fact that women can bond over things that exclude them. So pathetic and childish.
Well done to the salon owners who are standing up to this shit, hope they win the cases, and establish a precedent for other salons to follow.

Can I ask for a prostate check then?