Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Have we petitioned Stonewall directly?

117 replies

heresyandwitchcraft · 22/08/2018 14:35

Stupid question. I was thinking with the momentum of Stickerwoman that perhaps we could start a direct petition to Stonewall UK just to engage in dialogue with women's groups/set up a public neutrally structured debate?
Does anyone know if we have recently tried directly petitioning the LGBT groups to even just TALK to us? I know there have been ones to the government, but I really think it's more than a little crazy that we can't even speak with the so-called "other side."
Maybe if we get enough signatures to them they can stop pretending this is just a minority concern?
What do you think?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 22:30

This is a link to the archives of the web site where I first read transgenders raise the idea with Gay's and Lesbians in 2005.
shadowproof.com/category/pams-house-blend/

Too may great blogs have disappeared due to link rot and being thrust down the 'memory hole'.

heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 21:43

To be honest, perhaps one thing we could ask Stonewall is about their trans advisory group member Aimee Challenor and they have an opinion on recent events...

OP posts:
heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 21:23

bewilderness
Could you point me in the direction of any history on the very early stages of this "debate," especially with Stonewall? That would be fascinating.
I wonder whether we could pull up some of those old quotes, if only to prove that this has not always been the consensus view. Maybe it would remind people that these are new ideas. Even looking at some earlier articles about self-ID, the "opposing viewpoint" could actually be a quote from a transsexual person themselves. Nikki Sinclaire comes to mind.
I will probably just drop it, re:Stonewall.
But it feels a shame we are at this point.

OP posts:
12thGuelph · 26/08/2018 21:21

Yup so's hypocrisy.

thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 21:15

Check your asymmetry.
Violence is asymmetrical. You know that and so do we all.

thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 21:13

Transgender advocates raised the umbrella in 2005 and tried to force Lesbians and Gays and as many others as they could under it. They were told no but once same sex marriage was legal the heterosexual cross dressers rushed in to take over most LGBT organizations.
This is from Stonewall UK Glossary of Terms.
"Trans
An umbrella term to describe people whose gender is not the same as, or does not sit comfortably with, the sex they were assigned at birth.
Trans people may describe themselves using one or more of a wide variety of terms, including (but not limited to) transgender, transsexual, gender-queer (GQ), gender-fluid, non-binary, gender-variant, crossdresser, genderless, agender, nongender, third gender, two-spirit, bi-gender, trans man, trans woman,trans masculine, trans feminine and neutrois."

12thGuelph · 26/08/2018 21:04

You can't operate a default opt-out policy to crap from your side and a default opt-in policy to crap from mine. Check your asymmetry.

So stop putting stuff to me and have at it.

heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 20:15

I've repeatedly asked for this thread to stop being derailed - so I will be reporting further off-topic posts.
We've just got back on track.
I'm well aware of the circles Hetty Spoon runs in, thank you. I disavow each and every single one of the actual violent threats on that Twitter thread (of which I count such violent language coming from 6 accounts - and I do not recognize their screen names). Nor do I condone some of the other rhethoric on there. I ain't seen threats of violence from regular MN posters either.
However, your counter of one tweet thread, is absolutely nothing compared with the deluge of evidence we have of TERF being used in association with violent threats and imagery.
FFS

Anyways, thebewilderness, I agree that it seems this is all going to be hopeless. It's just sad to feel like we can't just talk about the difficult stuff and reconcile our differences like grown-ups. And I am sure the public would be interested in an open debate, because there is so much misinformation and bad blood right now. It's all so toxic.

OP posts:
thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 19:50

I was thinking with the momentum of Stickerwoman that perhaps we could start a direct petition to Stonewall UK just to engage in dialogue with women's groups/set up a public neutrally structured debate?
Does anyone know if we have recently tried directly petitioning the LGBT groups to even just TALK to us?

The effort has been made repeatedly over the years, to no avail.
Like so many other LGBT groups, when same sex marriage was legalized, Stonewall was taken over by MRAs and their focus is now on stripping women of their rights and doing away with safeguarding of children in the schools. All this in the name of equal rights for transgenders.

12thGuelph · 26/08/2018 19:20

Huh? Feminists are not being threatening and violent.

Feminists are just not doing this. Nobody here wants to "Fck up a , they're no better than fash."*

I wouldn't call them feminists, but there's plenty of threats.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1007546138361303040.html

If you'd started a new thread posing your question as to whether we are a "monolith" - then everyone could benefit from more easily being able to find it.

I've done that before. I got plenty of support, plenty of "disingenuous, goady, misogynist", one "Fuck off you (something something) misogynist wanker", and lost a friend.

I write grandmother, because it highlights Maria's humanity. It reminds you that she is a person.

Oh dear.

heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 11:50

Stonewall literally stonewall anyone who doesn't chant the mantra. And their activists WILL seek vengeance on those that don't. So approaching them - and trying to talk to them, means someone has to be the fall 'guy'.

Well, exactly. This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach. But in my ideal world I would like to have something like a petition or letter-writing campaign where it would be easy to do, there is safety in anonymity, and if enough people were able to join in then they cannot keep saying it's a "fringe concern" of some devil-worshipping witches.

OP posts:
IncrediblySturdyPyjamas · 26/08/2018 11:08

A plea to keep on topic. please.

Until Stonewall admit that they are on the wrong side of history, the only thing that anyone will get out of trying to engage them is misery and potentially some outing of people's personal details.

Stonewall literally stonewall anyone who doesn't chant the mantra. And their activists WILL seek vengeance on those that don't. So approaching them - and trying to talk to them, means someone has to be the fall 'guy'.

I personally don't think anyone deserves to be outed and put at risk in that way.

theOtherPamAyres · 26/08/2018 11:03

It's a pity that this thread about Stonewall has disappeared under a lot of posts about other things.

They are important things, but they belong elsewhere. In fact, these important things have been discussed elsewhere. Over and over again.

A plea to keep on topic. please.

heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 11:00

You know exactly what you did. You jumped on this thread and made this all about how evil the gender-critical side is.

This is one of the few places we can talk online.
There are countless threads debating nuances of positions.
This thread itself has mixed reactions to my OP.

If you'd started a new thread posing your question as to whether we are a "monolith" - then everyone could benefit from more easily being able to find it.
The ones being dehumanized are the feminists- replace TERF with anything else, like "trans" or "woman" or "lesbian."
I write grandmother, because it highlights Maria's humanity. It reminds you that she is a person. She may disagree with you politically. But she is somebody's grandmother, who was assaulted by three young people claiming to be human rights activists for trying to film masked protestors intimidating her and blocking her from attending a meeting.

Users of this very website - an anonymous parenting forum - were doxxed by someone claiming to do so for trans activism:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3225517-The-MNHQ-Moderation-team

Feminists are just not doing this.
Nobody here wants to "F*ck up a , they're no better than fash."
The people assaulting trans people are violent men, many of them paying for sex, who have never even heard of Germaine Greer. These are dangerous individuals we should all be finding ways to stop together.

But thank you at least for acknowledging that it is wrong to call for violence. Because many people on the trans activist side do not agree. As you can tell from the Twitter link I posted upthread detailing the reactions to Stonewall condemning violence.

OP posts:
Hullabalooo · 26/08/2018 10:30

I'll sign!

IncrediblySturdyPyjamas · 26/08/2018 10:30

Women in 2018 cannot even meet up in a room peacefully without threats, violence and vandalism.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3346945-Trans-vandals-attack-listed-building-with-obscene-graffiti

IncrediblySturdyPyjamas · 26/08/2018 10:18

Threats And Violence Are Bad, and that you think it's a one-sided thing; it’s not

Huh? Feminists are not being threatening and violent.

12thGuelph · 26/08/2018 07:46

I think it's typical of this victim narrative both sides have going that you require me to state something so obvious as Threats And Violence Are Bad, of course they are, and that you think it's a one-sided thing; it’s not. And what do Maclachlan's grandmother credentials have to do with anything, and has anyone actually been doxxed as opposed to having existing public domain information circulated?

I'd rather not keep engaging on this thread, I didn't want to spend more than 100 words on it, but IME it's almost impossible to disagree with FWR without derailing a thread because people get angry and pile on when I disagree and angry when I try to leave. And I'm not sure how "Hi… Who's the "we" of the title please?" could have been more polite and less of a loaded question.

heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 03:42

So what? Some people are goths, vegetarians, socialists, animal-rights activists, Scientologists, Antifa members, anti-vaxxers, Conservatives, etc, etc, etc.
You define yourself according to your belief.
Gender identity itself may be in a different category, much more personal and complicated - but the ideology around trans activism is just a belief. Some transsexuals are perfectly happy to say they are not actually female, but have adopted a womanly role. I've seen stories online where trans people get increasingly frustrated by trying to chase an unattainable goal of "becoming" the opposite sex, and feeling great relief when they come to terms with the idea that it's not actually possible.
Be proud of the "trans" part, is my own opinion.
But every time you use "cis" you are saying you have a gender identity that matches with your sex.
I will not be coerced into re-defining myself, the Oxford English dictionary, biological facts, and laws, simply to validate others. Don't force me to believe that males can be females, or that sex doesn't matter.
I tried, I can't do it.
If you are going to keep engaging on this thread, I am going to need some kind of sign that you are against the violence against women being threatened by some trans activists right now. Otherwise you are condoning the idea that people like me should be assaulted, raped or harassed.
It is this silencing and toxic atmosphere that prompted me to post this thread in the first place. Because I think it's dangerous, a 60-year old grandmother has already been beaten up for wanting to attend a talk, women have been doxxed en-masse, and it's bad for everyone. Stonewall or other LGBT organizations could help calm this down, just by trying to call for rational discussions.
You still haven't said anything about that?
Have a look at these threads documenting violence and coercion of women, lesbians -

Threats:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3342464-collating-evidence-of-threats-against-women-by-tras

Lesbians who don't do penis:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3294339-cotton-ceiling-evidence-thread

If you cannot condemn this hatred of women, of lesbians, with the horrific dehumanizing language and open calls for violence, then I cannot continue to engage in any kind of good faith. Because it means you agree with them.

OP posts:
12thGuelph · 26/08/2018 02:32

That's what I'm saying, I don't experience gender identity either AFAIK, but some people do.

heresyandwitchcraft · 26/08/2018 01:56

12thGuelph
That's an insane accusation.
Stating the fact that males cannot become females literally tells you nothing about how you are meant to treat them.
I personally would be polite, and have REPEATEDLY stated that you, trans people, every person, can believe whatever. It's none of my concern, really.
But others have to extend me the same courtesy.
And when it comes to changes to the LAW, which can affect me - then I have the right in a democracy to explain my philosophical position, argue, and provide evidence. I should be able to do so without actual fear of physical violence - which you still have not condemned?
Trans activists, and you, also have a right to your opinion and your arguments should be heard. An actual open debate, held in neutral territory, would be the healthiest way to do this. Not you derailing this thread and smearing us for something we never said.
Distinctions are not dehumanizing. We to be able to acknowledge basic truths like sex! Saying trans women are trans women, but not the same as adult human females (women), is a neutral fact. It's not meant as a value judgement. Neither kind of person is more or less "authentic." They're just two different categories. Gay people are not straight, but they're still people who deserve love and respect. Trans women are not women, but they're still people who deserve love and respect. Blue-eyed people don't have brown eyes, but they're still people who deserve love and respect.
I am not going to go around abusing Christians, or tell them what to wear, or what to believe, just because I do not believe in any of the tenets of Christianity. But equally, I would find it irritating if people kept preaching passages of the Bible to me, or told me to give up something for Lent. The same principle goes for trans people - I would never dream of going around harassing them just because they are trans.
The problem is that some trans activists are demonizing and harassing people like me for having a simple difference of opinion.
Saying you agree to disagree - and explaining your rationale for believing what you do - is not bigotry.

But I suspect not everyone experiences the same intensity of gender identitification, and I decided not to assume that my gender-meh experience is the only valid one.
You're guilty of this yourself by dismissing the concerns of people who do not experience gender in accordance with your ideology. I am one of them. I don't have a gender identity. Stop trying to force this on me.

OP posts:
thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 01:11

Men center themselves in all of life and all of history and here they are demanding they be centered in Feminism too.
It is exhausting to be exposed to these self centered asshats day after day wherever we go.

thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 01:08

@12thGuelph

WE ARE NOT THINGS!

thebewilderness · 26/08/2018 01:05

See, I find TWAW confusing too and I'd be much more comfortable if they stopped insisting on it and accept that we politely treat them as second class citizens.

What rights do transgenders not have that others have? None.
So when you say "second class citizens" you mean they are being treated the same as everyone else when everyone should be able to see they are special and need special treatment.

theOtherPamAyres · 26/08/2018 01:05

Stonewall's fingerprints have been found all over Scottish Councils' 'cut and paste' reponse to people enquiring about the disappearance of sex as a protecrted characteristic. East Lothian Council actually name Stonewall as the source of the new protected characteristic of 'gender'

A CIS Mumsnetter (cismyfatarse) has also found records of Stonewall's activities in the 'Lobby Register'' showing meetings with MSPs on the Gender Recognition Act.

Can Stonewall confirm that they advised councils that 'sex' was just a minimum standard and that Parliament had meant to say 'gender' because Parliament wanted the law to be inclusive. Did they really tell Councils to disregard the law and follow Stonewall's interpretation?

It is very much a matter of public interest and I think we should be told.

Swipe left for the next trending thread