Just to pick up on some of the points being made here...
Quite a few people on Twitter are trying to get their MPs to read the article, or borrowing the explanation in the article about exactly why this trans activism is not like lesbian and gay activism. The Stonewall view - also promoted by columnists like Owen Jones in the Guardian - is that this is section 28 all over again and anyone who doesn't get behind the Stonewall agenda and agree to rewrite sex and gender to suit the trans lobby is basically a bigot. If what I wrote achieves anything, I hope it will assist those who know that this is bullshit and are looking for a straightforward way to express that and convince others. It's the most important thing: resisting trans ideology is not bigotry. This is not 1988. You are not 'wrong side of history'. This is completely DIFFERENT.
It's also important to get over to people is that Stonewall - the most significant LGBT charity in the UK - has transformed. It is no longer what it was. It is no longer an honest broker or a source of reliable information. It's CEO has distorted it out of all recognition. The place we would all go - usually - to find good, reliable info on LGBT issues, has lost its integrity. Quite how this gets fixed at the moment, I am not sure - but it is the next issue I will write at length on. And I know there are others working on this too. We'll try, at least! For now, Stonewall should be ignored. (And I cannot BELIEVE I have to write this - but it's what things have come to!)
And as for the formaldehyde pickled balls of Sarah brown...I just hope she doesn't get elected in Cambridge. Poor Cambridge does not deserve THAT.
Jx