"I've just done that search that icy is getting a bit overexcited by
And it came up exactly the same as datun no steakhouse to be seen
I didnt look at the website as ive no fucking interest in doing so
But that's absolutely what came up"
You mean DeviantArt? Already been posted about several times? The website that is "one of the biggest sites featuring original photography, digital art, traditional art, literature, and filmmaking, and also one of the world's largest repository of free-to-use stock imagery and photography.
Got it's name because "DeviantArt started as a site connected with people who took computer applications and modified them to their own tastes, or who "deviated" the applications from the original designs. As the site grew, members in general became known as "deviants" and submissions as "deviations""
Includes such devastating material found in the screenshots. Including a set of pearls to clutch should you find such material too 'racy'. Anything considered 'Mature' locked away behind a filter that can only be switched off by signing up for an account and specifically agreeing to seeing Mature-rated images. Any and all art-work depicting explicit acts of sex forbidden from the site and banned when found. Damning stuff, no doubt, apart from, you know, Twitter and Reddit hosting content more explicit than actually allowed on DeviantArt. If somebody posting to DeviantArt makes them verboten to the users here, I wonder what you think about all those fellow posters on this board who freely admit to using Twitter and Reddit.
"I didnt look at the website as ive no fucking interest in doing so"
Always nice to know there's somebody else on here honest enough to admit they won't engage in simple basic research like, say, reading wikipedia to find out what a site is. But hey, if baseless ad hominem attacks are all you got, perhaps that's why you avoid the research. All those pesky facts, getting in the way and all.