Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Ultimate betrayal by the WEP

235 replies

Procrastinator1 · 27/07/2018 12:01

Dr Stock has just tweeted this text of a motion to be put to the party conference in September

d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/womensequality/pages/5826/attachments/original/1532600430/Fnl_Gender_recognition_act_motion_final.pdf?1532600430

Obviously the motion hasn't been passed yet.

Motion text: 1 The Women’s Equality Party recognises the damage done by socially constructed gender 2 stereotypes and supports changes to the Gender Recognition Act 2004. The Women’s Equality 3 Party supports changes to the current process by which transgender people are able to receive 4 legal recognition of their changed gender.

5 The Women’s Equality Party supports a process of legal recognition of changed gender which does 6 not require medical reports nor two years’ worth of documentation but a process of self- 7 determination of gender. The Women’s Equality Party supports legal recognition of non-binary 8 people.

9 The Women’s Equality Party calls on the Governments and administrations of the UK to make the 10 following changes to the current process as they revise the Gender Recognition Act 2004:

11 ● Change to the requirement to submit two supporting medical reports, one of a diagnosis of 12 gender dysphoria and one detailing treatment received. Change to the requirement to submit 13 documentation to prove the person has lived as their acquired gender for two years. Instead 14 require a self-determination process to change gender and to obtain a Gender Recognition 15 Certificate and new birth certificate. 16 ● Remove the requirement of spousal consent to obtain legal recognition of changed gender for 17 married people. 18 ● Allow people to change their gender to a third gender option as well as to male and female.

Motion rationale:

19 The Women’s Equality Party should clarify its position as changes to the Gender Recognition Act 20 (GRA) 2004 are being considered by the Governments and administrations of the UK. This change 21 would add depth to the already stated Women’s Equality Party position of supporting the right of an

OP posts:
Angryresister · 27/07/2018 12:27

What a load of crap...that shows how much women's rights and protections are important in this crazy world. Women members should resign and stop paying subs. Time for something new.

Bowlofbabelfish · 27/07/2018 12:22

Well I can’t possibly be the right sort of woman for them... I’m clearly womaning all wrong. They obviously don’t want my vote...

Although god alone knows where that vote will go. Is any party opposed to this madness?

TensionWheelsCoolHeels · 27/07/2018 12:22

So much for Sophie Walker's listening exercise then eh? Colour me surprised that WEP are pro self ID, with zero interest in the impact on women & girls. Might just be a motion but I can't see many people willing to stand up and voice objections at their conference. Fair play if anyone does but this steam roller won't end until women are all flattened under the weight of the woke idiots supporting this nonsense.

Procrastinator1 · 27/07/2018 12:22

If this motion passes they will have signed their own death warrant without having one councillor, or MP. What a waste of time and effort.

OP posts:
SwearyG · 27/07/2018 12:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Wanderabout · 27/07/2018 12:21

If a political party says men are women if they say they are it hands the ability to any man who wants to to dissolve women's rights on his say so.

It makes it impossible to accurately name or track sexism.

The challenges specific to being born in a female body would remain but become invisible.

How does any of that advance women's equality?

Have any of them thought how it might hinder it?

Bowlofbabelfish · 27/07/2018 12:21

It’s like saying you’re for women because you won’t charge us for the chains, handmaiden bonnet or scold’s bridle... all free! Such equal!

Perhaps I could start a party based on free Christmas decorations for turkeys...? Turkequality for all!

UpstartCrow · 27/07/2018 12:20

WEP are a drain on women's resources. What do they actually do for us in return for taking our money?

Bowlofbabelfish · 27/07/2018 12:19

Sorry how exactly are they a party for women with that stance? Confused

2rebecca · 27/07/2018 12:15

I don't see the point of the women's equality party if it includes people with Y chromosomes and anyone can self identify as a woman. If it isn't there because of the disadvantages women suffer because of their sex then what is it there for? There isn't a need for a political party for feminine people surely.