Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Another Girlguiding update

556 replies

AgnesBadenPowell · 22/07/2018 21:48

I've been a bit quiet lately. I'm under investigation, which I can't discuss in any detail, although my membership is now at risk. In the meantime, I'm still a leader and Girlguiding has not changed its stance on trans issues. The following is a bit of a stream of consciousness but I'm feeling quite troubled by it and need to let it out! I'd also be interested in what parents of rainbows think.

I took my rainbows on a sleepover this weekend. It was great! It also really bought home to me the risks posed by the trans policy. I feel quite upset and tearful about it.

We had 20 rainbows in a church hall. Three women leaders, including me, also slept in the main hall - at one end, out of the way, with our own sleeping mats and bags etc - but in the same room. The other women leaders slept in an adjoining room (more of a lobby really).

The adults used the gents toilets and the girls used the ladies and disabled facilities. Despite this some girls weren’t too bothered and just changed in the hall! One nosy rainbow followed me into the gents - luckily I was only brushing my teeth and not changing - and of course I shooed her out.

How would a set up like this (which is pretty common) work with a trans child or adult? We could look for new venues with more rooms/options but Girlguiding’s stance is that the trans child and adult should use the facilities of their chosen gender. And if parents aren’t aware of the single gender/mixed sex policy, they aren’t in a position to complain or take their children out.

On a personal note, the two other leaders in the hall are women that I don’t know very well. One of them I’ve only met once before, she’s a brownie leader who came to help so we met our ratios. My sleeping mat was right next to hers as there wasn’t much space. It was fine but I could not have done this with a self identified (ie male at birth) transwoman. I don’t know any woman who would feel safe sleeping right next to a male bodied person they had only met once before. And I should never, ever be expected to do so. For all the make up, dresses, female names, most transwomen do not have bottom surgery and retain their male genitalia. I would never be expected to share sleeping accommodation with a man I don’t know (or even ones I do - I’m not sharing a room with my male colleague on a business trip next week) so why would it be acceptable in Girlguiding, provided the male said he feels female?

It really hit home that it’s only fair and reasonable to expect people of the same sex to share spaces like this. I really don’t want to make trans people feel bad or left out - but my dignity, my girls dignity and privacy, is every bit as important as theirs.

OP posts:
Prawnofthepatriarchy · 06/08/2018 12:51

Men think this sort of thing out, bd67th, it's no coincidence. Thank you for the flowers. Here's some for you. Flowers

And thanks for the kind wishes, ChattyLion. Smile

VickyEadie · 06/08/2018 12:49

Safeguarding - it's so yesterday, isn't it?

sociopathsunited · 06/08/2018 12:47

Supposition time. Let's imagine....

Imagine, at some point in the future, that the worst DOES actually happen and a female Girl Guide is sexually assaulted at a camp by someone with a male physique, when her parents had no idea that a self-ID transgirl or transwoman with a male physique would be present.

What would be the legal standing for GG?

Obviously there would be criminal charge against the perpetrator.

But would GG be open for criminal charges? Would they be held legally responsible for the actions of the perpetrator, bearing in mind that both the attacked girl and her parents believed that she was in a safe environment? What would be the charges? Would they simply pass the buck onto the leadership of the individual troupe involved, or would GG the organisation have to carry the can? They should, it's them who are implementing this, but would they be able to throw their leaders under the bus?

Also, does anyone know if there would be any difference if the perp was a transgirl, or an adult? Age of criminal responsibility is 10, isn't it?

bd67th · 06/08/2018 12:43

@prawnofthepatriarchy

Flowers I also did not scream because my rapist was my then-bf who woke me up by raping me, I was in denial of what was happening, and I did not wish to wake our flatmate.

I too can see how the desire to safeguard the girls from seeing a sexual assault would be weaponised by a rapist against a guide leader, or even one of the girls.

VickyEadie · 06/08/2018 11:48

When I was a young teen we had a mixed camping out (bivouacking) session. There was about 15 of us and both male and female teachers. I slept beside my male bodied and female bodied classmates. I woke up with my feet on one boy in our sleeping bags. There was no ‘sexual undercurrent’ or male intimidation at play. We were kids and knew what was expected of us.

And when I was 15, my best friend was sexually assaulted on the way home from school by 3 classmates. She kept this to herself until we were in our late THIRTIES because she was so fucking traumatised by it. It's coloured her whole life, I might add.

Fact: teenage boys that you know can be predatory sex offenders.

drspouse · 06/08/2018 11:34

@AppleKatie did you get any sense of what leaders will be doing "under the radar" to safeguard girls and women at residentials?

And that poor trans identifying leader. How much distress they must be in, and now to be excluded. Shame on GG.

Iwasaventurescout · 06/08/2018 11:27

When I was a young teen we had a mixed camping out (bivouacking) session. There was about 15 of us and both male and female teachers. I slept beside my male bodied and female bodied classmates. I woke up with my feet on one boy in our sleeping bags. There was no ‘sexual undercurrent’ or male intimidation at play. We were kids and knew what was expected of us.

Whereas when I was a teen I went on a big camp and, in a tent, in the daytime, I was sexually assaulted by another Scout.
It happens. Just because it didn't happen to you, doesn't mean it will never happen. Teenagers are sexual beings.

TransplantsArePlants · 06/08/2018 10:34

... also denial and failing to access the Morning After pill?

TransplantsArePlants · 06/08/2018 10:33

Perspicacia

That's really interesting. Lots of unanswered questions about risky behaviour, rape and coercion

PerspicaciaTick · 06/08/2018 09:36

Research showing that LGB (not sure about the T) young people are twice as likely to get pregnant than their straight peers, suggests that GG might be underestimating the risks and that condoms may not be the answer (surprise).

www.reuters.com/article/us-pregnancy-teen-lgbt/pregnancies-more-common-among-lesbian-gay-bisexual-youths-idUSKBN0NZ2AT20150514

TransplantsArePlants · 06/08/2018 08:55

Floral

Quite

FloralBunting · 06/08/2018 07:47

Trans girls and teen boys are entirely different, eh? A 15 yo male body with no medical or surgical intervention (please God, at that age!) is exactly the same whether the owner thinks he's a boy or a girl.

Anyone who doesn't agree is beyond deluded.

Datun · 06/08/2018 06:11

I have no idea the mental gymnastics required to get from advising on teenage pregnancy to mixed sex teen camping without parental consent though

This.

As far as I know, the official line is that trans girls and teenage boys are completely different.

But when pressed for clarification, the answer is that's enough, we're not talking about it anymore.

They also responded to a query about autogynephilia. Saying something like there's nothing they can do about that, as they don't ask people whether they have a fetish. Which, whilst no doubt true, is hardly reassuring.

How can you acknowledge the possibility that you are exposing children to a male fetish on the one hand, and then agree that there is nothing you can do about it on the other?

Mamaryllis · 06/08/2018 01:34

Am pretty sure the NSPCC also veer to the ‘trans girls are girls’ side of the safeguarding bandwagon. Which is something of a concern as it leaves girls with no one willing to centre their rights and safety. I would love for more parents to email the NSPCC and ask them their stance on this though.

MipMipMip · 06/08/2018 01:22

Goo idea re whistleblowing to the NSPCC.

Mamaryllis · 06/08/2018 00:50

Totally. I have no idea the mental gymnastics required to get from advising on teenage pregnancy to mixed sex teen camping without parental consent though. I’d love to take her out for a nice cup of tea and ask her. It must be an explanation without compare.

LeiaTheSlaya · 06/08/2018 00:47

Girl Guides have been completely suckered in by this woman. They could easily have remained single sex, and trans inclusive, by including females identifying as trans/NB/GNC.

Whoever has or is taking over will be overseeing the demise of the organisation as more leaders drop out as they cannot in good conscience go along with such a dangerous policy, and members/parents who were seeking single sex groups, for all the reasons Agnes has posted about. If they think for a second that parents will go along with transwomen stepping in to fill the breach when volunteers say no more, they'll be unlikely to find many parents willing to entrust their children to these people in the same way they currently do with the women volunteers. Especially as there's no proper safeguarding to deal with this, and I'd not trust for a second any transwoman who went along with this. Any transwoman who sees this opportunity as a way to validate themselves, rather than accept the strict safeguarding and risk assessments that Girl Guides apply to male volunteers, is not someone who should be within 100 feet of girls aged 5 - 18, under any circumstances.

LaSquirrel · 06/08/2018 00:27

I assume her intent was that the pregnancy thing would be mitigated by handing out condoms

How on earth does that work in practice?
hey, your sturdy pyjamas look a little tent-shaped, here, have condom

I have a pro-tip to share. Condoms are not required where people with penises, no matter how they 'identify', are excluded. Simples.

Mamaryllis · 06/08/2018 00:24

Threw Blush

Mamaryllis · 06/08/2018 00:23

And still she opened the doors. And three girls and young women under the gender bus.

Mamaryllis · 06/08/2018 00:21

Julie Bentley’s previous job was at the Family Planning Association. She’s advised the government on teenage pregnancy ffs. I’m pretty sure she knows where babies come from. I have zero clue how she keeps that thought in her head without recognizing even some of the concerns around mixed sex groups. It’s mind-boggling. I assume her intent was that the pregnancy thing would be mitigated by handing out condoms, rather than keeping the organization single sex. There is no way she can possibly be naive enough to not have considered relationships at best, adusuve behaviour at worst.

AgnesBadenPowell · 05/08/2018 23:45

Girlguiding knows perfectly well how harmful gender stereotypes are. They do a major research project every year - see the girls attitudes survey 2017 https://www.girlguiding.org.uk/social-action-advocacy-and-campaigns/research/girls-attitudes-survey/

On the webpage around inclusion, there is this statement about including girls of all religious faiths (GG traditionally being a Christian organisation although God has been removed from the promise and church parades aren't very common any more):

Always give members all the information about events, including who will be attending and activities for the event. This will allow for them to make an informed decision about whether they attend.

www.girlguiding.org.uk/making-guiding-happen/running-your-unit/including-all/religious-differences-and-guiding/

How is this reconcilable with a policy that simultaneously advocates mixed sex accommodation with no prior parental agreement?

OP posts:
Datun · 05/08/2018 23:30

It's the relentless hoop jumping that gets me.

Right women, here is how you level the playing field. First of all, forget about most sport, just stick to gymnastics and invent an entirely new event called ducking under the bar. Also wear sturdy pyjamas, preferably made of chainmail, in order to stop attacks and preserve your modesty. Furthermore, call the police should anyone look at you funny. And remember, if you do get raped, it's completely illegal, okay? And, it really would be a good idea to simply not look at people in order to identify whether they are male. It's rude and bordering on the fetishistic.

So just to recap, don't play sport, invent nonsense events, wear armour plating, don't look at people, and call the police if it all goes wrong.

Or.

Segregate.

LaSquirrel · 05/08/2018 23:30

Many parents still think that girl guides is single sex. The policy says that it is single gender without explicitly stating 'mixed sex'.
Incorrect
Parents are told the organisation is single SEX. But it is not.

I think this is one of the most disturbing elements of the situation, the secrecy, the (rather deliberate) obfuscation of the actual policy, as well as silencing the whistleblowers.

If it is such a 'great policy', then ffs, promote it openly. Explain it to parents, let them judge it. But this stealth genderist policy is the only way they can slip it through. But worse, it is not allowed to be discussed openly that will allow proper safeguarding for a mixed-sex situation.

I noted that Julie Bentley stepped down as CEO at the end of June. It smacks of 'sabotage and run'. Throw some penis into the GG, then not hang around to see the consequences of the policy. Clearly on some level, Bentley must have realised what this would do to the Guides? Otherwise, why not stick around and sort out the mess that will result from this?

ChattyLion · 05/08/2018 23:14

Flowers Prawn.

Swipe left for the next trending thread