Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Who will get to keep the babies born of prison rape?

170 replies

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 19/07/2018 14:16

Since already identity is more important than sex.

When prisoners are placed in the female estate rather than the male because they identify as female, and perhaps soon natal females will be placed in the male estate because they identify as male, with rape being a fairly common crime perpetrated by people with penises (formally known as males) in prison - prisoners with uteruses (formerly known as women) will most certainly become pregnant within prison walls.

So what do we think will happen to the babies?

Will female prisoners be forced to have abortions?

Will the babies be automatically be taken into state care?

Will there be a demand for these babies because of the shortage of newborns to adopt?

Will there be a pressure on prisoners to turn a blind eye or even be complicit in baby farming to supply the demand?

How is this going to pan out?

OP posts:
WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 13:25

You are not above reproach.

OP posts:
WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 13:24

People have suggested that the fact that women prisoners getting raped by guards is commonplace/ they are already victims of rape means I, personally, am merely taking issue (making a non-issue) with rapists in women's prisons because it supports my gender critical position and I don't care about them for any other reason.

That is insulting.

OP posts:
CertainHalfDesertedStreets · 20/07/2018 13:15

It makes no difference, women are raped by guards.
There have been responses like
It makes no difference, women were raped before they were imprisoned
It makes no difference their families will pick up the slack and they'll keep the babies anyway - no harm done

There really haven't been responses like this. These are minimising rape. No-one here has done that and it is pretty insulting to suggest they have. People have pointed out some true facts about the question in your OP. But no-one has minimised or said they don't think what happens to women shouldn't be discussed. They have just asked you nor to make up sensationalist stories.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 12:52

Thanks rainsim I appreciate that.

If there are some male guards impregnating vulnerable womem in jail, shouldn't we call for female only guards in female only prisons?

I completely agree and I am really surprised that there aren't safeguards in prisons similar to children's homes, etc where staff must never enter a bedroom alone - it is always in pairs to protect against abuse and false allegations. And I am surprised that rape and sexual harassment by guards isn't something i've seen in reports, etc. It would have stuck in my mind i'm sure. But obviously I am not saying it doesn't happen but it has to be pretty successfully hushed up.

OP posts:
RainSim · 20/07/2018 12:44

If there are some male guards impregnating vulnerable womem in jail, shouldn't we call for female only guards in female only prisons?

I completely understand why you are so upset OP. It seems the implications haven't been thought through properly.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 12:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 12:27

Can't you see why your choice of words comes off as hyperbolic?

Yes I can see that.

Can you see why I might wonder at your motivation?

Mmmm I personally give people a bit more leeway, I do see others being criticised for this, but I tend to wait and see myself.

Would it not be better to ask for deletion and repost with a slightly different tone?

The combative, insult slinging posts from others makes one need to explain/justify one's position and by the time that appears to be understood it all seems a little bit late in the day to delete it.

I think the topic of children born in prison is an important one and as LangCleg rightly points out, this hasn't gone great has it?

Indeed. But I cba to start it. I'm too pissed off. Maybe someone else can start it.

OP posts:
WomanWithAltitude · 20/07/2018 12:25

You are really misrepresenting the posters on this thread clarice. No one at all has claimed that rape of female prisoners = no harm done.

Sexual abuse and rape have been rife in women's prisons for years, and these issues have been going on for years. The existing facts are bad enough without resorting to lurid speculation, and rape isn't only bad if it's a transwomen doing it.

Numerous people have rightly pointed out your lack of knowledge of the issues already facing female prisoners (and failure to do even basic research), and ignorance of the processes that are already in place to deal with female prisoners who give birth or get pregnant in prison.

Not one single person has said it's not a problem, no harm done.

If multiple people all think this thread is offensive for the same reason, maybe you should consider whether they might have a point.

Aridane · 20/07/2018 12:23

Agree with donquixote

donquixotedelamancha · 20/07/2018 12:16

Taking quotes from different posts, some of which were actually responses makes it look a certain way. People will paint things a certain way what ever the fuck you say.

I'm not trying to paint anything. I don't see how those quotes are misrepresented, but if they are not what was meant then someone who intends ill can do the same as me.

@WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice. If your intention is genuinely to have a discussion about this issue:

  • Can't you see why your choice of words comes off as hyperbolic?
  • Can you see why I might wonder at your motivation?
  • Would it not be better to ask for deletion and repost with a slightly different tone? I think the topic of children born in prison is an important one and as @LangCleg rightly points out, this hasn't gone great has it?

But it does piss me off that people are so afraid of things that make 'us' look bad that they vigorously and publicly stamp on it/you to silence before engaging.

I think it's healthy to want to focus on the facts and details and to think about how to communicate them if you want people to listen. Loud and (rightly) angry sometimes works, but not on a topic like this.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 12:06

Yes. I realise that my turns of phrase make people envisage something different to my intentions.

For example when I use the word 'conspiracy' I don't mean a plan that starts out on the back of an envelope and all parties are equally informed and complicit.

But it does piss me off that people are so afraid of things that make 'us' look bad that they vigorously and publicly stamp on it/you to silence before engaging.

OP posts:
LangCleg · 20/07/2018 12:01

What a surreal thread

It's a shame the thread went so combative. We could have done better at aiding each other's understandings and misunderstandings than we did and would have achieved more in the way of providing a voice advocating for very vulnerable women.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 11:59

There have been responses like:

It makes no difference, women are raped by guards.
It makes no difference, women were raped before they were imprisoned
It makes no difference their families will pick up the slack and they'll keep the babies anyway - no harm done
Etc
Etc

OP posts:
WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 11:55

Taking quotes from different posts, some of which were actually responses makes it look a certain way.

People will paint things a certain way what ever the fuck you say.

I find it odd that no one wants to consider the reproductive vulnerability of women prisoners where rapists are being transferred into their estate.

Why the fucking blind spot? It is utterly unethical for the state to facilitate the creation of lives by locking women up with rapists.

Ffs!

OP posts:
donquixotedelamancha · 20/07/2018 11:47

Will there be a pressure on prisoners to turn a blind eye or even be complicit in baby farming to supply the demand?

given extraordinary powers and privileges, it could lead to them breeding babies to be sold into sexual abuse

Maybe it could be a nice little earner. Off the back of relaxing surrogacy laws in the UK so people can farm/buy babies more easily.

Let's imagine one wanted to discredit MN-FWR, for some reason.

Let's imagine one wanted to paint it as totally deluded, spreading irrational lies and conspiracy theories. To suggest that the people posting are either bigots or being misled.

Surely this is the kind of thread one would post?

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 11:46

It's pretty surreal putting rapists in women's prisons which will lead to unplanned life.

OP posts:
Aridane · 20/07/2018 11:41

What a surreal thread

KwatahPanda · 20/07/2018 11:33

And I actually mean they don't care about trans prisoners (not just women's prisons). It's about proving you really believe if you close your eyes tight enough that TWAreal W

donquixotedelamancha · 20/07/2018 11:32

You are working on the assumption that the lobbying to relax adoption/surrogacy laws will be unsuccessful.

What lobbying? By whom? All the legal moves in recent years have made it harder to sever parental rights, even in the most extreme circumstances. There are more SGOs and fewer adoption as a result.

KwatahPanda · 20/07/2018 11:32

They seem to care an awful lot about prisoners with "an 8 inch surprise" who headbutt barmen to be able to do what ever the fuck they want so this is clearly not true.

They don't care about prisoners there though do they. They care about trans people because the trans lobby have told them too repeatedly and loudly and we're not meant to question why the trans lobby isn't trying to make life easier for transexuals and why it is instead destroying women's spaces.

Fienda · 20/07/2018 11:19

Did you mean misandry @deydododatdodontdeydo?

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 11:18

Because few people care about criminals. They never have. Male or female.

They seem to care an awful lot about prisoners with "an 8 inch surprise" who headbutt barmen to be able to do what ever the fuck they want so this is clearly not true.

OP posts:
WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 11:10

You need to look at the stats on women prisoners: care leavers, victims of sexual/domestic violence, non-violent, etc, etc.

Nothing misogynistic about shining a light on the fact that women are more likely to get custodial sentences than men for non-violent crimes, and they suffer more because there is no 'wife' on the outside looking after their kids. They make up 4 times the number of self-harm incidents than men even though they are only 5% of the prison population - and this is often based on the unbearable feelings of guilt about being separated from their kids.

OP posts:
deydododatdodontdeydo · 20/07/2018 11:03

Why aren't people up in arms about the vulnerability of gay men in prison?

Because few people care about criminals. They never have. Male or female.
This thread is dripping with the usual misogyny - women are poor, vulnerable things who are never responsible for their own actions.
Of course some prisoners (male and female) have been damaged by their upbringing and experiences - failed by the system if you like.
But these are adults who have made choices. They've been incarcerated due to their own actions.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 20/07/2018 10:37

In many countries, it's allow normal to have area where mothers can keep their babies with them for a while. Makes sense to have them in a prison with rapists around.

Quite. In the UK there are specialist mother & baby units to go to if they have space and you can appeal if you don't get one. What a horrendous thing to appeal - the right to be with your infant. The prison food is terrible for pregnant/breastfeeding women and the environment in understimulating for babies.

But it is a fair point - could males identify into the mother & baby unit?

OP posts: