Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Diva editor, responds to 'lesbian rights alliance' article in the times.

361 replies

garam · 17/07/2018 23:29

Another strongly worded restating of support for trans rights....

"A Times article, published today, announces “lesbian fury at Stonewall over ‘trans agenda’”, as if the 135 signatories of an open letter speak for every lesbian in the world.

Sorry, but you're wrong.

Given DIVA’s unequivocal stance on trans issues, I’m sure it goes without saying, but for anyone not quite sure: those 135 signatories do not speak for us, or for the majority of cisgender lesbians.

The letter, from an organisation calling themselves the Lesbian Rights Alliance, accuses Stonewall of erasing lesbians and says: “Stonewall has rarely represented our interests. Now in your single-minded policy to promote the trans political and ideological agenda you not only fail to represent us but you actually promote lesbian invisibility – and lesbian erasure.”

I do agree that lesbians are underrepresented in the LGBT community. But it's worse for bisexual people, and even more so for trans people who are also lesbian or bisexual. That's why it's so important that a magazine like DIVA exists, and that an organisation like Stonewall is women-led and promotes bi and trans inclusion. It's the likes of DIVA and Stonewall who are making us more visible.

In fact, I'd go further. It is not Stonewall – or any other LGBT organisation – erasing lesbian identities, but these so-called feminists who, by peddling hateful and transphobic rhetoric, make people like me not want to use the word lesbian to describe myself because I don’t want to be associated with their views. What a sad state of affairs.

The letter continues: “We urge you to stop claiming to represent us and leave the L out.”

Take your own advice, LRA, and stop claiming to represent lesbians. You do not speak for me, for DIVA, or for the majority of our community.

As I’ve said before, and I’ll say again, trans women do not erase lesbians. I believe we are enriched by trans friends and lovers, parents, children, colleagues and siblings.

Groups like the LRA would have you believe that it’s “them versus us”. It’s not. They are us. We’re one and the same, and we can’t let divisive, hateful and misguided people drive a wedge between us.

DIVA publisher Linda Riley agrees with me. She says: “It seems ironic to me to complain about a lack of lesbian visibility while, at the same time, asking the L to be removed from LGBT.

“We are stronger as a community and 135 lesbians should not be able to decide what a whole community should believe.”"

OP posts:
LangCleg · 19/07/2018 18:29

Tweet from Throwaway Gay:

“we’re not FORCING you to change your sexual orientation. we’re just gaslighting you and calling you a transphobe until you do!”

stop playing dumb. you know exactly what you’re fucking doing

twitter.com/Throwaway_Gay/status/1018567912934858752

garam · 19/07/2018 18:28

hotrocker

I already addressed that misrepresentation, why would people be trying to misrepresent me???

AngryAttackKittens
So, just to clarify, garam thinks that the Equalities Act requires lesbians to say yes to cock?

Pretty sure that wasn't the intent of the people who drafted and passed that law, mate.

Nope never said that, for the third time, I said everyone has the right to choose who their sexual partners are, and nobody else.

UpsatartCrow suggested the equality act somehow has something to do with sexuality, and I made a sarcastic remark to respond to the clearly weird reply.

*UpstartCrow
“We are stronger as a community and 135 lesbians should not be able to decide what a whole community should believe.”"

thats 135 lesbioans and The Equality Act.*

For clarity, everyone has the right to choose their sexual partner, no if's no but's.

And people do not get to define someone else's sexuality, including transphobes, who do not have the right to tell lesbians they are no longer lesbian whatever the circumstances.

Glad to help..

OP posts:
garam · 19/07/2018 18:24

@garam "I have said at least three times in this thread people are able to choose their partners based on whatever criteria they want, they are free to exclude whoever they want."

I apologise unreservedly if I have ascribed to you ideas or views you do not hold. flowers thankyou

"I have never seen a single trans activist say anything contrary to that..."

Then you have not looked. Google Riley J Denis 'Your dating choices are discriminatory.' Or RJD's equally offensive girlfriend. They just love yelling women what to do!

your dating choices are discrminatory? so by opening a conversation about how trans identities interact with non indentities in terms that trans women use about themselves.......... is coercing and forcing people to accept sexual partners they do not wish too? I don't see that at all. I see someone clearly 'outspoken for clicks' on youtube addressing a controversial and nuanced discussion, that clearly from the offset is in terms that trans women are women. If people can't get past that, why the hell are they watching Riley? to get outraged on purpose? If you don't accept trans women are women, of course your going to miss every type of nuance and scan for a gotcha. seems disingenuous to me.

If I can find, then I will post.

"...that trans voice as representative..."

Representative of whom? People spout their own views on social media. Trans people do not get to define lesbianism.

representative of trans people, ie not some crank who says something stupid. And I agree trans people do not get to define lesbianism, and equally neither do transphobes, and they do not get to attack lesbian women who have trans partners and demand they admit they are no longer lesbians

"...you will never see trans person advocating a position of forcing people to accept them as sexual partners."

You certainly will not hear them use the word 'force'. But coercion is the same thing. You will see coercion. You will hear it.

  • no sorry, the idea that lesbians do not have trans women as partners, and they need to be coerced to accept it is undermined that there are plenty of lesbians with trans women partners, and plenty of lesbians speaking up and saying quite clearly that is not true. But they don't have any agenda, they are speaking on their own terms for trans people. Currently we have an overlap between some transphobes who happen to be lesbian that are trying to co-opt the lesbian community, as you are well aware from the fact that most lesbian groups and orgs are trans supportive, which is why like in this thread.... they are abused as penis-centred imposters, despite it clearly being the majority.*

'It is as ridiculous as it is fabricated.'

It is not fabricated. But you are right, to guilt trip women into accepting someone sexually, is worse than ridiculous, it is rapey.

But then I think I will post links, and maybe others will too, and you will say it is not real or not all trans women are like that. And of course they are not.

Just think for a minute.
.why are lesbians putting their head above the parapet to speak out now, why be so hated publicly? Why risk so much if it is not true?

just think for a minute why are far more lesbians putting their head above the parapet to speak out now, why be so hated publicly by transphobes who will go as far to hijack pride and chase people like Stella Duffy off twitter, just to support trans women if it is not true.

OP posts:
TransplantsArePlants · 19/07/2018 17:47

or even No Shit Sherlock

TransplantsArePlants · 19/07/2018 17:47

yeah and it always comes down to the fact that you and most of this forum refuse to accept trans women are women

Not Shit Sherlock

Italiangreyhound · 19/07/2018 17:40

But thanks for looking out for me. Flowers

Italiangreyhound · 19/07/2018 17:39

@HotRocker my apology stands only if I did actually say something untrue.

SophoclesTheFox · 19/07/2018 17:35

Garam, why won’t you answer the question?

Is it because you know the scenario fails because, as hotrocker so clearly put it, at least one lesbian (natal female) needs to be present to validate it; or is it that it fails twice over because you know that a male can never be a female homosexual regardless of who else is present?

Which is it- does it lack one lesbian or two?

HotRocker · 19/07/2018 17:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OlennasWimple · 19/07/2018 17:12

garam - lesbians do not include real life penis and penis bearers in their sexual activities. It is that simple. Why are you trying to over-complicate it?

Italiangreyhound · 19/07/2018 17:08

@Bowlofbabelfish and @longtimelurkingtrans thank you.

Please do join in longtime. I think you are pretty eloquent too. We need trans voices too. I know not all trans people buy into this TWAW. It's not anti trans to speak about biological truth.

The TRA reteric really is like a medieval religion where science is banned and dissent is blasphemy - and is punished!

This is not good for trans people or youth. Teenage girls (some) really do think you can change sex and men can give birth!

Italiangreyhound · 19/07/2018 16:58

@garam "I have said at least three times in this thread people are able to choose their partners based on whatever criteria they want, they are free to exclude whoever they want."

I apologise unreservedly if I have ascribed to you ideas or views you do not hold. Flowers

"I have never seen a single trans activist say anything contrary to that..."

Then you have not looked. Google Riley J Denis 'Your dating choices are discriminatory.' Or RJD's equally offensive girlfriend. They just love yelling women what to do!

If I can find, then I will post.

"...that trans voice as representative..."

Representative of whom? People spout their own views on social media. Trans people do not get to define lesbianism.

"...you will never see trans person advocating a position of forcing people to accept them as sexual partners."

You certainly will not hear them use the word 'force'. But coercion is the same thing. You will see coercion. You will hear it.

'It is as ridiculous as it is fabricated.'

It is not fabricated. But you are right, to guilt trip women into accepting someone sexually, is worse than ridiculous, it is rapey.

But then I think I will post links, and maybe others will too, and you will say it is not real or not all trans women are like that. And of course they are not.

Just think for a minute.
.why are lesbians putting their head above the parapet to speak out now, why be so hated publicly? Why risk so much if it is not true?

UglyCathKidstonBag · 19/07/2018 16:39

If I transition and “become a man” and then detransition am then I a “transwoman”?
If I “identify” as gay whilst I’m a man, is my husband gay?
Even if he “identifies” as gay, is he actually a homosexual male whilst he is rhythmically pumping his sperm into my vagina?

longtimelurkingtrans · 19/07/2018 16:26

@ItalianGreyHound Great posts and gets your point across beautifully if only I could post so eloquently I would join in this thread properly.

Datun · 19/07/2018 16:15

Garam

You are making this so complicated.

Just accept that you and all other transactivists allow the validation of men to overcome absolutely everything else.

Including sexual orientation, science, biology and women's rights.

It makes you misogynistic, on every level. The need to overcome all those realities just to validate man is extraordinary.

Pitiful.

I don't know why you are baulking at the eleventh hour over putting your money where your mouth is to confirm that two men giving each other blowjobs is lesbian sex though.

Bowlofbabelfish · 19/07/2018 16:14

Queer ≠ lesbian.

Absolutely. Shouldn’t even need saying should it, that a lesbian is a female homosexual.

Let me rephrase - if the push was for greater acceptance of gender non conformity in society with no parallel push to remove or infringe on anyone else’s rights, freedoms or ability to live as they wish, then almost everyone would be on board.

LangCleg · 19/07/2018 16:09

If the push was for greater acceptance of gender non conforming people with no push for removalnof safe spaces for women and child safeguarding

... and no re-branding of lesbian by heterosexuals.

Queer ≠ lesbian.

Bowlofbabelfish · 19/07/2018 16:00

garam

The position set out above by Italian greyhound is eminently reasonable and I’d bet sums up how an awful lot of people feel about this.

Humans, quite simply, cannot change sex. Everyone has a right to safety. Everyone has a right to freedom of expression. What they don’t have a right to do is reduce the freedoms of others in order to express themselves.

People can identify however they wish. However they do not have the right to force the rest of the world to accept a position that is faith based. Nor do they have a right to force the rest of the world to give up their own safety in order to validate them.

That is what is alienating people. If the push was for greater acceptance of gender non conforming people with no push for removalnof safe spaces for women and child safeguarding, then almost everyone would be on board with it.

NoDykeDoesDick · 19/07/2018 15:56

Garam, are you saying all the material gathered in the Cotton Ceiling section of www.terfisaslur.com is fake?

I have personally seen transwomen saying these kinds of things to lesbians.

You should probably stop dismissing and making excuses for rape culture, especially after your rape apologist comment in another thread.

Prawnofthepatriarchy · 19/07/2018 15:13

If you think there is no material difference between trans women and men, I'm not surprised your wallowing around gender-crit boards using whataboutery as society moves on.

As society moves on? I think not. Having successfully positioned themselves as the most oppressed of the oppressed, gained the ears of influential people, and changed the law while no one was looking, the TRAs suddenly find themselves confronted with the first real opposition to their ideology.

Gender critical feminists are armed with fact, science and logic, Garam. Trans ideology is faith based - arguing that human beings can change sex simply by declaring this to be true. When challenged on these beliefs transactivists can do nothing but hurl insults and do anything to distract from their threadbare claims. Hence all the accusations of transphobia, etc.

Trans ideology is regressive and oppressive. It's homophobic and misogynistic. And women working at grassroots level are finally getting ourselves heard. The TRAs are no longer having it all their own way, which is why we see all the rants and rages.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 19/07/2018 15:10

garam

2D+69=L

YES or NO?

garam · 19/07/2018 15:04

This isn't the issue that was being discussed, it was people telling lesbians they are no longer lesbian for whatever reason. btw...

OP posts:
garam · 19/07/2018 15:03

*If a woman wants to sleep with a trans woman, go for it. Like I really could not care less. but do not tell other women they should include trans women in their dating pool.

You are not on the right side of history if you are attempting to coerce women to date people they do not wish to date for any reason at all.*

I have said at least three times in this thread people are able to choose their partners based on whatever criteria they want, they are free to exclude whoever they want.

I have never seen a single trans activist say anything contrary to that, I've seen people discussing nuance around attractions and how that criss-crosses how we currently categorize sexual orientations, conceived and previously understood without consideration of trans people.

I have seen such things turn up on anti-trans propaganda sites, by likely fake accounts, or accounts with about 20 followers, yet their are trans voices with thousands of followers, and as such many trans people can be said to regard that trans voice as representative, and you will never see trans person advocating a position of forcing people to accept them as sexual partners.

It is as ridiculous as it is fabricated.

When a trans woman says she is a lesbian, it indicates her attraction to females over men. It really is that simple.

The fake framing that trans women en-masse are demanding lesbians MUST date and have sex with trans women is purely an anti-trans framing.

And certainly not advocated for by any kind of true activist voice in the trans community.

OP posts:
Italiangreyhound · 19/07/2018 14:51

@garam Can I say I believe you are saying these things because you actually feel it is kinder to trans people. I don't think you are being goady or argumentative. I always try and see the best in people.

But even I would be quite surprised if you really said you felt people could change sex.

So could you be honest and say what you think is really happening. Are you saying it doesn't matter? It doesn't matter what sex someone is born, or what gentiles they have or had in the past?

'Far more people in general and women disagree with you, especially plenty of those lesbians that are being discussed.' I am afraid I do not believe you.

A lot of people have come out on twitter to tell lesbians off for how they feel.

These people on twitter say they are women, they say they are lesbian, maybe they are; some say they are partnered with trans women and identify as lesbians and so do their partners.

Those who are not females, and not in relationship with females are not actual lesbians.

It's a bit like white people who identify as 'black' or 'Filipino. If they are challenged by genuine black or Filipino people can the white people really just argue back I'm 'black' or 'Filipino because I say I am. Is that OK?

The thing is the atmosphere for women and feminists and lesbians is so toxic right now it is quite common, I think to comply with the zeitgeist and say the same as the TRAs, just for a quiet life.

And other women have no idea these debates are going on.

If a woman wants to sleep with a trans woman, go for it. Like I really could not care less. but do not tell other women they should include trans women in their dating pool.

You are not on the right side of history if you are attempting to coerce women to date people they do not wish to date for any reason at all.

Italiangreyhound · 19/07/2018 14:37

@garam 'yeah and it always comes down to the fact that you and most of this forum refuse to accept trans women are women.'

I think you have got it. The thing is I think you are feeling that this failure on my part to agree with you is based on some kind of dislike or whatever. It is just based in fact. I know what males are and I know what females are. And the vast, vast majority of the world conforms to this basic biological principle, with a very small number of people with medical conditions which vary.

Males are socialized in our society in a different way and have different bodies to us, reproductively. Private areas like toilets and changing rooms (locker rooms) hospitals, medical wards etc are generally segregated by sex for the protection of females.

My understanding of these basic principles is just a fact and most people would, I feel sure, agree if they even guessed these basic truths were up for debate.

What it does not mean is anything negative. I care about trans people, I know trans people, I want trans people to be safe, I want everyone to be safe. I honestly, honestly do.

Males have a much, much higher rate of offending in violent and sexual crime than women. So any man who says he is a woman, is not female. He is a man who says this about himself. Now, I am not required by law to simply accept or believe what any person tells me about themselves.

If the law is changed to mean I need to believe any man who tells me he is now female like me, it will be a travesty. It will lead to danger for natal females and. I think, it will lead to a backlash against trans people, which I most certainly do not want.

It does not mean I hate or dislike anyone. It means I do not believe you can change sex, and that is based on biology.

I am genuinely sorry this is so difficult for a number of people but we cannot re-order society and ignore serious safeguarding issues because some people are uncomfortable in their sexed bodies.

There are lots of trans people who understand this and agree with this position. This position is not anti-trans.

Swipe left for the next trending thread