Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Diva editor, responds to 'lesbian rights alliance' article in the times.

361 replies

garam · 17/07/2018 23:29

Another strongly worded restating of support for trans rights....

"A Times article, published today, announces “lesbian fury at Stonewall over ‘trans agenda’”, as if the 135 signatories of an open letter speak for every lesbian in the world.

Sorry, but you're wrong.

Given DIVA’s unequivocal stance on trans issues, I’m sure it goes without saying, but for anyone not quite sure: those 135 signatories do not speak for us, or for the majority of cisgender lesbians.

The letter, from an organisation calling themselves the Lesbian Rights Alliance, accuses Stonewall of erasing lesbians and says: “Stonewall has rarely represented our interests. Now in your single-minded policy to promote the trans political and ideological agenda you not only fail to represent us but you actually promote lesbian invisibility – and lesbian erasure.”

I do agree that lesbians are underrepresented in the LGBT community. But it's worse for bisexual people, and even more so for trans people who are also lesbian or bisexual. That's why it's so important that a magazine like DIVA exists, and that an organisation like Stonewall is women-led and promotes bi and trans inclusion. It's the likes of DIVA and Stonewall who are making us more visible.

In fact, I'd go further. It is not Stonewall – or any other LGBT organisation – erasing lesbian identities, but these so-called feminists who, by peddling hateful and transphobic rhetoric, make people like me not want to use the word lesbian to describe myself because I don’t want to be associated with their views. What a sad state of affairs.

The letter continues: “We urge you to stop claiming to represent us and leave the L out.”

Take your own advice, LRA, and stop claiming to represent lesbians. You do not speak for me, for DIVA, or for the majority of our community.

As I’ve said before, and I’ll say again, trans women do not erase lesbians. I believe we are enriched by trans friends and lovers, parents, children, colleagues and siblings.

Groups like the LRA would have you believe that it’s “them versus us”. It’s not. They are us. We’re one and the same, and we can’t let divisive, hateful and misguided people drive a wedge between us.

DIVA publisher Linda Riley agrees with me. She says: “It seems ironic to me to complain about a lack of lesbian visibility while, at the same time, asking the L to be removed from LGBT.

“We are stronger as a community and 135 lesbians should not be able to decide what a whole community should believe.”"

OP posts:
RowcheRumble · 18/07/2018 12:30

The only thing Linda Riley gives a shit about is her wallet. I doubt very much she believes a man can be a lesbian and I’d also bet you’d never find a cock in her bed.

gendercritter · 18/07/2018 12:24

But it's worse for bisexual people, and even more so for trans people who are also lesbian or bisexual. That's why it's so important that a magazine like DIVA exists, and that an organisation like Stonewall is women-led and promotes bi and trans inclusion

I rolled my eyes so hard at this. Lesbians! Ye are not as oppressed as male lesbians. Go away and flagellate thyselves for thy privilege.

SardinesAreYum · 18/07/2018 12:08

Basically heterosexuality is OK and same sex attraction is disgusting.

At least when it comes to women.

Who'd a thunk it.

SardinesAreYum · 18/07/2018 12:06

Lesbain now carries a certain amount of cache I think

If you are a lesbian with a dick.

The old fashioned cunty sort of lesbians who are all too often unwilling to confirm to femininity in many / any ways at all, and have a distressing tendancy to be unapologetic and hardcore feminists, they are way way out. I mean who ever liked them anyway? New breed are a vast improvement.

BeyondRadicalisationPortal · 18/07/2018 12:05

I'll even go "Offended of Tunbridge Wells" and go as far as calling it disgusting.

"Rebranding" lesbians/gay men as both sex attracted and discouraging bisexuality as a "brand" for those people (poor wording, but hopefully the meaning gets through!) is blatantly biphobic (denial of bisexuality) and homophobic/lesbophobic (denial of their right to be ONLY same sex attracted). I can't see how anyone can see it as anything else, tbh.

LangCleg · 18/07/2018 12:05

Yes. All this does seem very biphobic.

BeyondRadicalisationPortal · 18/07/2018 12:01

Pride and LGBT in general is suppposed to be about freedom to love whoever and express yourself however, not about legitimising and maybe even encouraging internal shame in bisexuals because they don't line up with the L or G.

SardinesAreYum · 18/07/2018 12:00

So lesbian means: Likes people with cunts and also with dicks.

That is a total redinition of the word lesbian, which used to mean, likes people with cunts.

Note: Lesbain never meant: attracted to femininity, attracted to internal gender ID, etc etc. It meant, same sex attracted - cunt.

The words lesbian, woman, girl, female, and biological sex have now been altered to include people with cocks.

The words we are left are, if I am tallying correctly, "reproductive role", but, I'm not sure what the cunty side of that is called TBH and suspect that will be gone soon anyway.

Meanwhile, I await with interest mainstream "lesbian" pornography changing to show two people with cocks, and all the male viewers giving it a thumbs up.

Vickyyyy · 18/07/2018 11:58

Sorry, what are 'monosexuals'?

That would be people exclusively attracted to one sex. So heterosexual, lesbian, gay. Only people who aren't monosexual are bi people like me.

BeyondRadicalisationPortal · 18/07/2018 11:58

Having sex with both biological sexes makes you bi, regardless of whether you'd prefer to call yourself a lesbian, a gay man or heterosexual. Reminds me very much of the "men who have sex with men" who are ashamed to call themselves gay/bi, and it's actually really upsetting to read/hear as a bisexual.

ErrolTheDragon · 18/07/2018 11:57

I think the definition of the term 'pansexual' is somewhat illuminating:
' not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.'

... the corollary is, there are people whose sexual choices are limited by those different criteria. (As presumably we all know). Since when has 'lesbian' not been defined in terms of biological sex?

OvaHere · 18/07/2018 11:51

'no if's no buts' no cocks

lesbian = adult female homosexual

ErrolTheDragon · 18/07/2018 11:50

trans lesbian partner

Unless you mean a transman whose preference is females, there's your logic fail.

WhereDoWeBeginToCovetClarice · 18/07/2018 11:48

Who the fuck would think DIVA has anything to do with lesbians?

Pomo queer take over laaang time ago.

ErrolTheDragon · 18/07/2018 11:45

I can't quite see how it's homophobic, unless the person thinks there's something wrong with being bi. Confused

garam · 18/07/2018 11:42

I'm happy to double down.........

If I need to clarify, everyone has the absolute right to choose who they sleep with, no if's no buts.

However you do not get to tell lesbians who choose a trans lesbian partner, they are no longer lesbians.

THAT is literally lesbian erasure.

OP posts:
LangCleg · 18/07/2018 11:40

Yes, do double down, garam. We're all ears.

Bowlofbabelfish · 18/07/2018 11:37

telling lesbians they are now bisexual for being with a trans woman, is actually homophobic.

Break that down for me, in simple terms - are you saying that humans can change sex? You don’t believe that do you?

CertainHalfDesertedStreets · 18/07/2018 11:36

Words have meanings.

I am really sorry that you had to hear that OP but there it is. Have a Biscuit and a little sit down and you'll feel better. Maybe breathe into a paper bag?

OvaHere · 18/07/2018 11:34

It's not a same SEX relationship however much you try to obfuscate. Words and definitions matter especially regarding the law and protecting rights.

garam · 18/07/2018 11:30

telling lesbians they are now bisexual for being with a trans woman, is actually homophobic.

OP posts:
OvaHere · 18/07/2018 11:27

Sexual orientation is a protected characteristic and refers to same sex relationships. Nothing to do with gender feels.

Stop being so homophobic garam

garam · 18/07/2018 11:16

Langcleg......
*The equality act also states for the purposes of the act trans women are treated by default as female, so .. nice source.

OMG. You think EqA gives penis access to vagina, whatever vagina might have to say about it?

Way to fly your flag. Thanks for the open rape apologia.

As others have said, I hope nobody reports this post so that it is left to stand for all to see.*

Hilarious :-D
typically bat-shit.

My statement was..... The equality act also states for the purposes of the act trans women are treated by default as female, so .. nice source.

And you read the rest into it....... brilliant!

If I need to clarify, everyone has the absolute right to choose who they sleep with, no if's no buts.

However you do not get to tell lesbians who choose a trans lesbian partner, they are no longer lesbians.

THAT is literally lesbian erasure.

OP posts:
BeyondRadicalisationPortal · 18/07/2018 11:09

Yy lacy, everything you said.

LangCleg · 18/07/2018 10:20

Yes, garam - how do you feel about the incestuous chumocracy Popchyk illustrates? Do you feel that such a tiny niche of community members mostly concerned with mutual backslapping should be speaking for the entire community? That would seem rather elitist.