Very good shout Elle, we should use that in responses to the Q on other impacts.
I'm only scanning, but a lot of this seems to be consulting on removing evidence requirements, rather than reforming the panel process IYSWIM. E.g. Questions on removal of
Stat Dec
Evidence of living in acquired gender for a period of time
Diagnosis of gender dysphoria
Report detailing treatment received
As well as consulting on removal of:
Fee
Spousal consent
I thought the whole point was that the Gender Recognition Panel (GRP or "Panel" in the consultation)'s decisions could sometimes be unclear, and additional evidence unhelpfully requested giving delays, and they only meet infrequently etc.
Not that this consultation would consider removal of all evidence requirements (interestingly including the famous nefarious-man-repelling statutory declaration)